The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

96 protocols using ab31630

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Rat Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tissue sections were stained with H&E according to routine procedures and were also subjected to immunohistochemistry. First, they were subjected to an antigen retrieval step at 96°C for 20 min in a citrate buffer at pH 6.0. Subsequently, they were blocked with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) with 5% bovine serum albumin for 1 h and incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4°C in a humid chamber. The antibodies were mouse anti-rat CD68 (1:100, ab31630, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), rabbit anti-rat alpha-smooth muscle actin (1:100, 14395-1-AP, ProteinTech Group, Wuhan, China), rabbit anti-rat iNOS (1:25, ab31630, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), rabbit anti-rat CD206 (1:200, ab64693, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The sections were then incubated with fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (antibody to mouse or rabbit) for 1 h at 37°C in a humid chamber (1:1,000, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States). Cell nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml of DAPI (Solarbio, Beijing, China). Fluorescence was detected using a Nikon C2 Confocal microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with a ×20 and ×40 objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Kidney Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PAS and H&E staining were performed according to standard procedures. Paraffin sections were placed in citrate-buffered solution (pH 6.0) and boiled for 10 min for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Samples were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS and incubated with primary antibodies, namely Rabbit anti–Podocin (1:500; ab93650, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), Aquaporin 1 (1:500; ab9566, Abcam), CD68 (1:500; ab31630, Abcam), PHH3 (1:500; #9706s, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), and the lectin, Dolichos biflorus Agglutinin (DBA, 1:500; Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Diaminobenzidine substrate (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) was used for the color reaction. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Secondary antibody alone was consistently negative on all sections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Infarcted Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 4 h and transferred to 70% ethanol. Then, the tissues were placed in cassettes, dehydrated through a serial alcohol gradient, and embedded in paraffin wax blocks. Histopathological examination was performed in infarcted tissue on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded 5–6 μm sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin using standard methods and examined via light microscopy (Mak et al., 2020 (link)). Primary antibodies against CD68 (1:500, Abcam, #ab31630) and eNOS (1:300, Abcam, #ab76198) were used. A TUNEL assay kit was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems). HE staining was used to detect the arrangement of RBC morphology to evaluate the integrity of microvessels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Aortic Root

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cryosections of the aortic root were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The sections were blocked using 5% normal goat or donkey serum (Abcam) at room temperature for 2 h and then incubated with primary antibodies, including anti-CD68 (1:100, Abcam, ab31630), anti-VCAM-1 (1:100, Abcam, ab134047), anti-E-Selectin (1:100, Santa Cruz, sc-137054), overnight at 4 °C followed by appropriate fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) for 2 h at room temperature in the dark. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and mounted with a fluorescence mounting medium (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat#17985-10, Hatfield, PA, USA). Images were acquired using an Olympus FV1200 confocal microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Quantification of immunofluorescence staining was performed with the Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Myocardial Inflammation via CD68 Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After SW imaging, heart weight was measured to calculate relative heart weight against body weight. The heart was sectioned transversely at the mid-papillary level, and then fixed with 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5-μm sections. Sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin for evaluating infiltrating inflammatory cells, and with picrosirius red for evaluating fibrosis. Macrophages, which accounted for the majority of infiltrating inflammatory cells in EAM model, were identified by mouse anti-rat CD68 monoclonal antibody (ab31630, Abcam) staining. The CD68-positive area was quantitatively calculated using ImageJ software (version 1.52v, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) by setting an intensity threshold that matched the visually identified staining areas as previously reported5 (link). Similar to SW imaging, the percentage of CD68-positive area in a circular ROI of 1-mm in diameter was measured at five locations, and the average value was calculated. The percentage of CD68-positive area was compared between each group. The relationship between SWDS and the percentage of CD68-positive area was analyzed to examine whether SWDS reflects pathologically evaluated myocardial inflammation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence analysis of cellular markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) antibody (1:1200, 20R-PR020) was from Fitzgerald (Acton, MA, USA). Anti-CD68 (1:200, ab31630), anti-alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA, 1:200, ab184675), anti-p63 (1:200, ab124762), anti-Ki67 (1:400, ab16667), anti-β-III tubulin (1:200, ab52623) and anti-vimentin (1:200, ab8978) antibodies were from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Anti-laminin 5 antibody (1:200, sc-13587) was from Santa Cruz (Dallas, TX, USA). Anti-AQP5 antibody (1:100, A9927) was from Abclonal (Wuhan, China). Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated IgG (1:300, A11058, A21207) and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated IgG (1:300 A11055, A21206) antibodies were from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). DAPI was from Vector (San Francisco, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Neutrophil, Macrophage, and Inflammatory Markers in Implant and Wound Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Implant neutrophil and macrophage numbers were determined by staining for Myeloperoxidase (MPO; ab90810, Abcam) and CD68 (ab31630, Abcam) respectively. Cellular localisation of NGAL and MMP-9 in implant inflammatory cells and isolated peripheral blood neutrophils was determined using antiNGAL (M145, SantaCruz) and antiMMP-9 (sc-6840, SantaCruz) antibodies according to standard procedures [19 (link)]. The secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 or 594, Invitrogen) were used for visualisation and the nuclei were stained with DAPI. Images were captured using an Olympus AX-70-Fluorescence microscope.
The cellular localisation of NGAL (ab41105; Abcam) and MMP-9 (ab76003; Abcam) was examined in skin wound tissue by immunohistochemistry. For quantitation of NGAL, the staining intensity was examined in the epithelial (top), granulation tissue (middle) and inflammatory (basal) zones and scored by two independent observers based on a scale of 0 = no staining above isotype control to 3 = intense staining. The score for each zone was summed and the data was analysed using Chi squared analysis at an intensity cut off at ≥ 6. MMP-9 staining was localised mainly to cells in the granulation tissue layer and the staining intensity in this area was quantified using Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histological Analysis of Liver and Lung

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liver and lung were dissected free and fixed in 10% formalin solution. The sections were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and examined by light microscopy. Liver sections were stained with Sirius Red (Polysciences Inc., Warrington, PA, U.S.A.) to determine the extent of collagen deposition. The immunohistochemical staining was performed with anti-CD68 antibody (diluted 1:200, ab31630, Abcam Cambridge, UK) to detect pulmonary CD68-positive macrophages, with anti-CD31 antibody (1:200; Serotec and Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) to determine hepatic angiogenesis, and with anti-von Willebrand factor (vWF) antibody (1:100, MCA127T, AbD Serotec, UK) to determine pulmonary angiogenesis [4 (link),17 (link)]. The numbers of CD68-, CD31-, and vWF-positive cells per high-power field (magnification 200x) were counted by a semi-quantification method [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Activated Notch1, Microglia, and Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four-micron-thick brain coronal sections were prepared as described earlier, deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated via alcohol gradients, and washed with PBS (0.01 M, pH 7.4). Following antigen retrieval, the sections were blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature (RT) and incubated with primary antibodies as follows: rabbit anti-activated Notch1 (1:200; Ab52301, Abcam, Cambridge, UK); goat anti-Iba1 (1:300; Ab5076, Abcam); mouse anti-CD68 (1:200; Ab31630, Abcam); rabbit anti-NeuN (1:200, 24307T, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers MA, USA) overnight at 4 °C. The next day, the slices were washed with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies: donkey anti-goat Alexa 488 (1:500; A11055, Invitrogen), donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 555 (1:500; A31572, Invitrogen), donkey anti-mouse Alexa 488 (1:500; A21202, Invitrogen), donkey anti-goat Alexa 555 (1:500; A21432, Invitrogen), goat anti-mouse Alexa 555 (1:500; A21422, Invitrogen), and donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 488 (1:500; A21206, Invitrogen) for 1 h at RT. After washing with PBS three times, the sections were stained by 4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole for 10 min at room temperature and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica-DMI8, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Tissue Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were sectioned into 5 μm thick sections. After deparaffinization, rehydration through graded ethanol, and antigen retrieval with pH 6.0 citrate buffer in a pressure cooker for 15 mins, sections were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 hour at room temperature and then incubated with diluted primary antibodies in 1% BSA at 4 °C overnight. Anti-smooth muscle 22α (ab14106, ABCAM, 1:50) and anti-smooth muscle heavy chain (ab53219, ABCAM, 1:50) were used for detecting smooth muscle contractile proteins, anti-von Willebrand factor (anti-vWF (A0082, DAKO, 1:200) and anti-CD31 (NB100–2284, Novus Biologicals, 1:100) for endothelial cell markers, anti-CD68 (ab31630, ABCAM, 1:100) for macrophage cell marker and anti- IL-1 beta (NB600–633, Novus Biologicals, 1:100) for pro-inflammatory cytokine. Alexa Fluor® 647 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (715–605-151, Jackson Immuno Research, 1:500), Alexa Fluor® 647 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (711–605-152, Jackson Immuno Research, 1:500), Alexa Fluor® 594 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (715–585-150, Jackson Immuno Research, 1:500) were used as secondary antibodies. The sections were counterstained with DAPI before being observed under an immunofluorescence microscope (DP80 microscope digital camera, Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!