The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jsm 5400

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan

The JSM-5400 is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) manufactured by JEOL. It is designed for high-resolution imaging and microanalysis of a wide range of materials. The instrument features a tungsten filament as the electron source and provides a magnification range from 8x to 300,000x.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

35 protocols using jsm 5400

1

Characterization of Electrodes via SEM, EDS, XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was performed using a JEOL JSM 5400 scanning microscope after coating them with gold using a JEOL JFC-1199E ion sputtering device for the characterization of L.C and without coating for the characterization of the SS/PbO2 anodes used.
EDS was planned to assess the surface elemental compositions of L.C using a JEOL JSM 5400 scanning microscope. EDS was performed after coating them with gold using a JEOL JFC-1199E ion sputtering device.
XRD characterizations of the elaborated SS/PbO2 anodes were done using an X-ray diffractometer D8 Advance (Bruker, (CNRSM)) and a Diano, Ka Co radiation at a wavelength of 1.54 nm using the Debye method (Holzwarth and Gibson 2011) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fabric Surface Characterization and Nanoparticle Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface characteristics of the treated fabrics and their metal nanoparticle contents were evaluated using SEM (JSM-5400, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fabric Characterization via EDX-SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) in combination with SEM (Jeol–JSM-5400, Japan) was used to determine the morphological and surface characterization as well as the elemental composition of the treated fabrics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Enamel Surface Examination via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five teeth from each group were randomly selected to examine morphological changes on the enamel surface via SEM, while the other 20 teeth from each group underwent bracket bonding (JEOL JSM 5400, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Characterization of Irradiation-Resistant Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the isolation of IRRB, the dose of 10 kGy was chosen and 1 g of irradiated roots of P. turgidum was crushed as indicated in the previous step. After shaking in an orbital shaker, at 150 rpm for 30 min at room temperature, each mixture was serially diluted (10−1–10−5). A volume of 100 μL of each dilution was plated on TSA. After 7 days of incubation at 30 °C, different morphotypes were selected, purified, maintained in tryptic soy broth (TSB) and stored in 25% glycerol (vol/vol) at − 80 °C (Guesmi et al., 2019 ).
Morphological features of most IRRB were examined using a Scanning Electron Microscope (JSM 5400, JEOL, Japan) as described by Kaewkla and Franco (2019) (link). After growth on TSA plates at 30 °C for 48 h, bacterial cells were fixed with 2% w/vol glutaraldehyde in 0.9% NaCl solution and then fixed cells were dried with graded (50, 70, 90 and 100%) ethanol solutions. All manipulations were done in triplicates (3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy for Mineral Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the samples selected from optical microscopy (NS1, NS3, NS8) using a Jeol JSM 5400 to determine the chemical composition of mineral phases through EDS of backscattering (BSE) images. To produce an electrically conductive surface for SEM, both thin and cross sections were coated using thin-film evaporation of graphite in a vacuum coater, with a thin layer of about 20 nm thickness.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scaffold Microstructure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The micro- and macrostructures of the scaffolds were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical microscopy, respectively. Scaffolds were dehydrated with graded ethanol, air-dried, and sputter-coated with gold for 80 sec at 40 mA (Sputter Coating Device SCD 005, Bal-Tec AG, Liechtenstein). Analysis was performed at 5 kV accelerating voltage in a scanning electron microscope (Jeol JSM-5400, Japan). For macroanalysis, scaffolds were imaged using a stereoscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) from the side and top view.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of Maxillae in TRPV4 Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Maxillae from TRPV4+/+ and TRPV4−/− mice (n = 3 per group) were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L sodium cacodylate buffer overnight and decalcified with 10% EDTA. The gingival tissues were carefully separated from the teeth and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 hour at 4°C. The tissues were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, immersed in t‐butyl alcohol, freeze‐dried, sputter‐coated with platinum using an ion coater (JEC‐550; JEOL) and examined under a scanning electron microscope (JSM‐5400; JEOL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Mineralogical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mineralogical composition of the fraction of the LRA (de Vera et al., 2019 (link)) used in this study was further characterized by XRF, XRD and SEM‐EDS. The total chemical composition of the major elements (wt.% oxides) was obtained using a Rigaku Supermini X‐ray fluorescence spectrometer, with natural and synthetic standards, and an uncertainty of 0.01% (for sample preparation and analytical details, see Tangari et al. (2020 )).
XRD measurements of the powdered samples were obtained using a Rigaku MiniFlex II Benchtop XRD System (Rigaku Company, TX, USA) operating at a voltage of 20 kV and a current of 15 mA with CuKα radiation. The mineral phase was identified by comparing the calculated values of interplanar spacing and corresponding intensities of diffraction peaks with theoretical values from the Powder Diffraction File database (JCPDS‐ICDD 2008). The target material of the X‐ray tube was Pd. SEM‐EDS analyses were performed using a JEOL JSM 5400 with an EDS attachment (iXRF Si‐drift detector with ultrathin window) (acc. voltage: 20 keV; carbon‐coated samples).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dehydrating and Sputter-Coating Teeth Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Teeth samples were dehydrated in ethanol solutions of increasing gradients (50%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100%). Each bath required 5 min (Fig. 1-F). Samples were conserved in ethanol 100% at 4 °C untel be used (Fig. 1-G). These samples were sputter-coated with gold using a JEOL (JFC-1100E) coater (Fig. 1-H) and then dried under vaccum and observed using high-resolution SEM (JEOL, JSM-5400) at 5000X and 10000X magnifications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!