The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dxr raman spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The DXR Raman spectrometer is a compact and versatile instrument designed for Raman spectroscopy. It provides high-resolution Raman analysis across a wide range of applications. The DXR spectrometer features a stabilized laser source, advanced optics, and a high-sensitivity detector to deliver accurate and reliable Raman data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using dxr raman spectrometer

1

Raman Spectroscopy for Compositional Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The measurements were performed at SOLEIL using a DXR Raman spectrometer from Thermo Fisher using a 532 nm laser for excitation, and delivering a power on sample lower than 0.5 mW. A 50× objective with a 25 µm pinhole was used. It produced power densities less than 200 W/mm2 with a laser spot below 2 µm. Similar power densities were used by Brunetto et al. [56 (link)] to avoid sample alteration. The spatial resolution of Raman spectroscopy is better than that of IR spectroscopy, due to a lower diffraction limitation. Raman spectroscopy was mainly used as an independent confirmation of the results obtained by IR, PIXE, and TOF-SIMS to reduce ambiguity of specific components identified within the analysis region. The data typically consisted of 5–10 scans of 30 seconds each. Raman spectra were recorded with a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1. Specific points or small maps on selected regions of interest were recorded, resulting in more than 100 spectra (see Figure 8A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrochemical measurements were performed in a Metrohm Autolab potentiostat/galvanostat equipped with an FRA module and controlled by Nova 2.1.6 software. The Au-SPEs (DRP-220AT, DropSens) contained a gold working electrode (4 mm), a gold counter electrode, and a pseudo-reference electrode with silver electrical contacts. The switch box connecting these Au-SPEs to the potentiostat was obtained from DropSens. Raman studies were performed with a Thermo Fisher Scientific Company DXR Raman spectrometer using Thermo Scientific OMNIC software. Spectra were recorded in the range of 300 to 1800 using a 785-nm excitation laser through a 50 × confocal microscope objective. Laser power was set at 10 mW, with an aperture of 50 µm slit, for an acquisition time of 10 seconds. UV–Vis studies were performed using the Evolution 220 UV–Vis spectrophotometer from Thermo Fisher Scientific Company. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using a JEOL JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope operating at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV. SEM was performed using a JEOL JSM 6301 F/Oxford INCAEnergy 350/Gatan Alto 2500 high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of Particle Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All selected
samples (10–20 randomly chosen particles) were analyzed in
a DXR Raman spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with an Nd–YAG
laser (532 nm) and a confocal microscope with three objective lenses.
The laser power on the sample surface was controlled to approximately
6 mW. The spot diameter of the laser beam reaching the sample was
1.2 μm. The spectra were recorded in the 800–2000 cm–1 wavenumber range, covering the first-order bands
of the samples. All spectra were processed by a linear baseline correction,
and the bands were fitted in the 800–2000 cm–1 region by PeakFit4.2 software. Finally, the positions, intensities,
widths, and areas of the bands were determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanomaterials Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nanomaterials’
morphology was investigated by a field emission scanning electron
microscope (FE-SEM, Hitachi SU 6600, Japan). ImageJ was employed to
obtain the Au NP size distribution through a contrast filter. The
calculated diameter of the Au NPs (approximated as a circumference)
was retrieved thanks to the NP areas obtained by ImageJ. XPS analysis
was performed on a Nexsa G2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with an Al
Kα source (photon energy of 1486.7 eV; spot size of 100 μm).
The obtained data were evaluated by using Avantage software and CasaXPS.
High-resolution spectra were scaled using the adventitious carbon
peak as a reference. Raman spectra were collected using a DXR Raman
spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Massachusetts) operating at 633 nm
and 4 mW. The PL spectroscopy measurements were performed on an FLS980
fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments) with double monochromators
on both excitation and emission sides, equipped with an R928P photomultiplier
in a thermoelectrically cooled housing (Hamamatsu Photonics), with
a 450 W xenon arc lamp as the excitation source. Spectral correction
curves were provided by Edinburgh Instruments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Graphene Oxide Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The produced NPs were characterized using various characterization techniques to confirm the functionalization and to explore its effects on GO properties. XPS measurements were conducted over a 0–1200 eV range on a Kratos AXIS Ultra DLD (Kratos Analytical Ltd, Manchester, UK) with Al-Kα source and X-ray power of 15 Kv and 20 mA. The elemental compositions of GO and GO-PDA were analyzed using FLASH 2000 elemental analyzer (Thermo Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA). XRD measurements were carried out using EMPYREAN PANalytical diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical B.V., Eindhoven, Netherlands) equipped with a Cu-Kα radiation source (λ = 1.5406 Å). FTIR-UATR spectra were determined using FTIR Perkin Elmer 2000 in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 to study the surface functional groups of pristine GO and GO-PDA.
Raman spectra of the prepared NPs were obtained with DXR Raman Spectrometer operated with a 532 nm laser and a 10× objective (Thermo Scientific™). Moreover, the morphological structure of GO and GO-PDA NPs was investigated using SEM analysis that was conducted using the JEOL model JSM-6390LV. TGA analysis was conducted to assess the thermal stability of both samples using Pyris 6 TGA (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) under nitrogen gas at a 10 °C/min heating rate and over a temperature range of 30–800 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Raman Spectroscopy of Encapsulated Graphene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectra are taken with a Thermo Fisher DXR Raman spectrometer using a 455-nm laser source with a power of 1 mW and 20 s duration multiple exposures. Raman spectra and maps for encapsulated graphene were acquired in a Thermo Fisher DXRxi Raman spectrometer using a 455-nm source, with a power of 10 mW and 20 s duration to provide adequate signal to noise ratio from the graphene within the heterostructure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Graphene Oxide Cathodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specific surface area of RGO paper or carbon paper cathodes was determined with the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method as previously described53 (link). The Agilent 8453 G1103A spectrophotometer (Agilent, Denmark) was used to measure the UV-vis spectrum of the GO solution. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed with a Thermo Scientific™ K-Alpha™ + X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer System with an aluminum K-Alpha (1486 eV) as x-ray source. All the samples were deposited on polished Si-wafer by drop casting for XPS measurements. X-ray spot area for measurement was set at 400 μm and flood gun was used for charge compensation. Raman spectroscopy was conducted with a Thermo Scientific DXR Raman spectrometer equipped with a 455 nm laser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Raman Spectroscopy of Nanomaterial Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman data were measured on a DXR Raman spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) with a laser operating at 633 nm. The sample (0.1 mg) was deposited on a silicon wafer (1 × 1 cm) and an excitation laser was focused on its surface. The laser power on the sample was set to 2 mW, and the exposition time was 3s. Each measured Raman spectrum was an average of 512 experimental microscans. Raman spectra were processed using control software (Omnic, version 8, Thermo Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Characterization of Biochar

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology and microstructure of the samples were observed using a Hitachi SU8010 field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Pore textures of the prepared biochar samples were determined by N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K using an ASAP 2020 instrument. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were performed on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. Raman spectra were conducted on a laser confocal microscopy Raman spectrometer (DXR, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at 532 nm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was recorded on a Multilab 2000 with Al Kα radiation for surface chemical species detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Structural and Electrochemical Characterization of Carbon Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structural information of the obtained samples was characterized by using a powder X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku) equipped with a Cu-Kα radiation of 0.15418 nm, and Raman spectra were recorded by using Raman spectrometer (DXR, Thermo-Fisher Scientific). N2 absorption/desorption isotherms were collected by Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument, and the pore size distributions of samples were calculated by non-local density functional theory (NLDFT) method. Moreover, an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, VG Multi Lab 2000 system) was carried out for analyzing the compositions of the products. The surface morphology and inner structure were detected by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800) and high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM, Titan G2 60-300). Electronic conductivity is reciprocal of electronic resistivity, and electronic resistivity of carbon membrane was carried out at room temperature under 0.55 T magnetic field using the van der Pauw method by the Hall measurement (ECOPIA HMS 3000). Moreover, the carbon membrane was prepared with grinding apparatus by using the powder compressing machine under the 10 MPa.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!