The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ar 310a

Manufactured by Nidek
Sourced in Japan

The AR-310A is a fully automated refractometer designed for ophthalmic applications. It measures refractive errors, including spherical, cylindrical, and axis values. The device is capable of conducting measurements quickly and accurately.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using ar 310a

1

Refractive Error and Eye Biometrics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All subjects underwent a refractive error examination without pupil dilation using autorefraction (NIDEK, AR-310A, Japan). SE was calculated as the sum of the spherical power and half of the cylinder power [20 (link)]. All the eyes of the subjects also underwent a thorough ophthalmic evaluation, including intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated ophthalmoscopy fundus examination, and color fundus photographs (Canon, Retinal Camera CR-DGi, Japan). B-scanning was also performed. AL measurements were taken using partial optical coherence interferometry (IOL-Master; Carl Zeiss Meditec, La Jolla, CA, USA). All the repeat measurements used the median for the analysis. Demographic data on each subject’s age and sex were collected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Pre-OCT Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following were performed before the OCT scanning: (1) evaluation of refractive error without pupil dilation by optometry (AR-310A, NIDEK, Japan); (2) axial length measurement by IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany); (3) intraocular pressure measurement by noncontact tonometer (TX-20, Canon, Japan); (4) color fundus photography (retinal camera CR-DGi, Canon, Japan); (5) ultrasonography of the eye ball to exclude posterior staphyloma (B-scan CineScan, Quantel Medical, France); and (6) careful examination of the peripheral retina by a senior retinal specialist (Fenghua Wang) using an indirect ophthalmoscope to exclude peripheral degeneration, retinal tear, or retinal detachment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Myopic Ocular Characteristics in Young Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This cross-sectional study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. All of the participants gave written informed consent. The study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (registration number ChiCTR2100043611, accessed on 1 March 2021).
We recruited 138 patients from Tongji Hospital from March 2021 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were: (1) age between 18 and 30 years old; (2) best-corrected visual acuity more than 0.8; (3) spherical equivalent (SE) less than –6.00 D; (4) normal intraocular pressure; (5) clear refractive medium; (6) no history of previous ocular surgery; (7) no ocular diseases other than high myopia.
All participants underwent detailed ocular examinations, including intraocular pressure assessment (IOP) (NT-510, NIDEK Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), refractive error assessment (AR-310A, NIDEK, Tokyo, Japan), slit-lamp biomicroscopy (BP900, Haag-Streit International, Köniz, Switzerland), indirect ophthalmoscope (YZ6H, 66Vision.Tech, Suzhou. China), and axial length (AL) (AL-scan, NIDEK Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated as the sphere value plus half the cylindrical power.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Normal Eye Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 15 volunteers were recruited for this study, and a total of 30 normal eyes were evaluated. Each subject underwent a standard refractive diopter (D) measurement (AR-310A; Nidek, Aichi, Japan), slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and dilated fundus examination. The inclusion criteria were no evidence of ocular media opacity, retinal disease, or significant refractive error (myopia of three Ds or more or hyperopia of one D or more) in the study eye. Exclusion criteria included ocular surgery, poor-quality images with a signal strength less than 9 (maximum of 10), significant motion artifact, or inability to abstain from blinking or movement during image acquisition. No eyes were excluded in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Automated Visual Field Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SWAP was performed using an Oculus Centerfield 2® perimeter (Goldmann size III, duration of stimulus 0.2 sec, blue stimulus with a transmission of 440 nm, yellow background illumination of 10 cd/m 2 [31.8 asb], threshold mentioned 4/2 strategy, investigation area 10-2, program macula threshold).
The objective refraction used for optimal correction in perimetry was measured by the use of an autorefractometer Nidek® AR-310A. Contact lens wearers were tested with their lenses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!