The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tracefinder software version 4

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific

TraceFinder software version 4.1 is a data processing and reporting tool for Thermo Scientific mass spectrometry systems. It provides analytical data processing, review, and reporting capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using tracefinder software version 4

1

Metabolomic Analysis of BAD SAHB vs Vehicle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data except the untargeted metabolomics analysis were quantified by integrating the area under the curve of each metabolite using MassHunter Quant (Agilent Technologies). Pathway enrichment analyses were performed using Metaboanalyst software (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/) based on KEGG metabolic pathways. Pathway analysis was performed comparing the relative metabolite levels between BAD SAHBA SD and vehicle, in the presence of cytokines (Figure S1A). The impact score represents the number of nodes contained in the data and the adjusted p value was obtained using Holm adjustments (Xia and Wishart, 2011 (link)). Targeted processing of GSH and isotopolog for data collected using LCMS “method D” was conducted using TraceFinder software version 4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Compound identities were confirmed using reference standards. GSH metabolite isotopolog abundances were normalized to the recovery of internal standards inosine-15N4, thymine-D4 and glycocholate-D4. Total ion counts of each mass isotopolog of GSH were corrected for natural abundances of 13C and fractional labeling out of the total pools of GSH were calculated in Excel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pesticide Quantification in Duplicate Diets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Duplicate diet data from both LC- and GC-HRMS was processed using Tracefinder software version 4.1 (Thermo Scientific). The in-house created target list for the LC data analysis contained precursor ion m/z, retention time, and the m/z of the most intense fragment ion for 212 pesticides. A standard and a spiked sample containing these pesticides were included in the analysis to obtain semi-quantitative results. For GC-HRMS data processing, a target list containing 49 pesticides was created, and a standard containing these 49 pesticides was included in the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Metabolomics Analysis of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treating cells with CKi or MitoCKi, cells were collected and washed with PBS. 250 μL of 80% MeOH containing 0.05 ng/μL thymine-D4, 0.05 ng/μL 15N4-inosine, and 0.10 ng/μL glycocholate-D4 was added to the cell pellet and vortexed. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation for 10 mins, 15,000 × g, 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred into a fresh tube and centrifuged again. The supernatant was collected and subjected to LC-MS analysis as described previously31 . Briefly, metabolite extracts were loaded onto a Luna-HILIC column (Phenomenex) with 10% mobile phase A (20 mM ammonium acetate and 20 mM ammonium hydroxide in water) and 90% mobile phase B (10 mM ammonium hydroxide in 75:25 v/v acetonitrile/methanol). Analysis was carried out using a QExactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Negative and positive ion modes were used with full scan analysis over m/z 70–750 m/z at 60,000 resolution, 1e6 AGC, and 100 ms maximum ion accumulation time. Targeted processing of a subset of known metabolites was conducted using TraceFinder software version 4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Compound identities were confirmed using reference standards. In all cases metabolite abundance was normalized using internal standards and relative changes were assessed by comparison with metabolite extracted from the same sample type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Metabolite Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All extracted samples were then subjected to LC/MS analysis as previously described (Mills et al., 2018 (link)). Metabolite extracts were loaded onto a Luna-HILIC column (Phenomenex) using an UltiMate-3000 TPLRS LC with 10% mobile phase A (20 mM ammonium acetate and 20 mM ammonium hydroxide in water) and 90% mobile phase B (10 mM ammonium hydroxide in 75:25 v/v acetonitrile/methanol). A 10 min linear gradient to 99% mobile phase A was used to separate metabolites. Subsequent analysis was carried out using a QExactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Negative and positive ion modes were used with full scan analysis over m/z 70-750 m/z at 60,000 resolution, 1e6 AGC, and 100 ms maximum ion accumulation time. Additional MS settings were: ion spray voltage, 3.8 kV; capillary temperature, 350°C; probe heater temperature, 320°C; sheath gas, 50; auxiliary gas, 15; and S-lens RF level 40. Targeted processing of a subset of known metabolites and isotopologues was conducted using TraceFinder software version 4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Compound identities were confirmed using reference standards. In all case metabolite abundance was normalized using internal standards and relative changes were assessed by comparison with metabolite extracted from the same sample type (i.e., tissue, IF, plasma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Orbitrap HRMS Peptide Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The instrument used was a Thermo Q-Exactive HF Orbitrap HRMS with a heated electrospray ionisation (HESI) source coupled with a Vanquish Flex LC system. Thermo TraceFinder software version 4.1 was used for data acquisition and data analysis. The instrument was calibrated weekly for mass accuracy according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The optimised tuning method and parameters used for MS acquisition are described as follows: sheath gas flow rate, 50 units; auxiliary gas flow rate, 5 units; sweep gas flow rate, 0 unit; spray voltage, 4 kV (positive); S-Lens RF level, 50; capillary temperature, 350°C; auxiliary gas heater temperature, 325°C. The full scan MS1 settings were 60 K resolution, 3e6 automatic gain control (AGC); maximum injection time; 200 msec; m/z 150–1000 scan range. All Ion Fragmentation (AIF) MS2 was used with all precursor ions introduced into the high collision dissociation (HCD) cell to form product ions simultaneously. The AIF instrument settings were 60 K resolution, 3e6 AGC target, maximum injection time 200 ms, m/z 80–1000 scan range, and three stepped normalised collision energies of 10, 30 and 50. The size and structure of the peptide precursor ions range widely; therefore, several collision energies were used concurrently to produce product ions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Targeted Metabolite Profiling with LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolite extracts (10 μl) were loaded onto a Luna-amino column (Phenomenex) using the UltiMate 3000 TPLRS LC device as previously described (Xiao et al., 2020 (link)). Subsequent analysis was performed using a Q-Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as previously described (Xiao et al., 2020 (link)). Targeted processing of a subset of known metabolites was conducted using TraceFinder software version 4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Compound identities were confirmed using reference standards. In all cases, metabolite abundance was normalized using internal standards, and relative changes were assessed by comparison with metabolite extracted from the same sample type (i.e., plasma). Metabolomics data were analyzed and principal component analysis plots were generated using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!