The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using piperacillin tazobactam

1

Evaluating Antibiotic Susceptibility with EUCAST Standards

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was determined on Müller–Hinton agar by standard disc diffusion method as recommended by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST; www.eucast.org). Seventeen antibiotics were tested, including ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime, aztreonam, amikacin, tobramycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, ertapenem, meropenem, imipenem and colistin (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). The MIC for imipenem was determined using the Etest method (bioMérieux, La Balmes les Grottes, France) and the result was interpreted according to the EUCAST breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae (susceptible if MIC ≤ 2 mg/L)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of GNB Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All GNB isolates which were non-naturally colistin-resistant and grown on the LBJMR medium were subjected to an AST according to the current (DD) test method (Kirby-Bauer procedure). The minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) was confirmed by CLSI and EUCAST guidelines [28 ]. AST was performed with a definite turbidity bacterial suspension in NaCl (0.5 McFarland; 1.5 × 108 cells/mL). Antibiogram test included the following sixteen antibiotics: amoxicillin (AMX), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC), cefepime (FEP), piperacillin/tazobactam (TPZ), cefalotin (KF), ceftriaxone (CRO), ertapenem (ETP), imipenem (IMP), fosfomycin (FF), nitrofurantoin (F), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), amikacin (AK), ciprofloxacin (CIP), doxycycline (DO), colistin (CT), and gentamicin (GT) (Bio-Rad, Marne-la-Coquette, France). Hierarchical clustering of the antibiotic resistance phenotype was performed using Multi-Experiment Viewer (MeV 4.9.0).
Strains with a narrow diameter zone of inhibition (ZOI) less than 15 mm were picked out to confirm the minimal inhibition concentration value using other complementary tests, namely the E-tests method (BioMérieux) and UMIC test (Biocentric Bandol, France) [29 (link)]. Furthermore, strains were considered to be multidrug-resistant (MDR) if bacteria were resistant to more than three different classes of antibiotics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by employing disk diffusion, gradient test, and broth microdilution test according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations, 2021 [43 ]. The disks impregnated with the following antimicrobial agents were tested: imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), ceftazidime (10 µg), cefepime (30 µg), amikacin (30 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (30/6 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), ticarcillin (75 µg), ceftazidime-avibactam (10–4 µg), and ceftolozane/tazobactam (38–10 µg) (BioRad, Watford, UK). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for colistin, imipenem, and meropenem were evaluated by ComASP Colistin (Liofilchem, Roseto, Italy) and Gradient strip test (Liofilchem, Roseto, Italy), respectively. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as the control strain in the antibiotic susceptibility testing. MDR P. aeruginosa were defined as isolates that tested resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent of three or more different classes. Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa were defined as a subset of MDR isolates that tested non-susceptible to at least one antimicrobial agent of five different classes. P. aeruginosa was defined as pandrug-resistant (PDR) when the organism was resistant to all tested agents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility of the clinical isolates was determined by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton II agar as recommended by the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (CA-SFM: Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie) [52 ]. The 14 antimicrobial drugs tested (all from Bio-Rad) were (i) beta-lactam antibiotics class: ticarcillin (TIC, 75 μg), ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (TCC, 75 / 10 μg), piperacillin (PIP, 75 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (PPT, 75 / 10 μg) ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 μg), cefepime (FEP, 30 μg), aztreonam (ATM, 30 μg), imipenem (IPM, 10 μg) and meropenem (MEM, 10 μg), (ii) aminoglycosid antibiotics class: gentamicin (GMI, 15 μg), amikacin (AKN, 30 μg), tobramycin (TMN, 10 μg), (iii) fluoroquinolone antibiotics class: ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg) and (iv) other antibiotic class: fosfomycin (FF, 50 μg + 50 μg G6P).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The standard disc diffusion method was processed for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AST) according to CLSI guidelines (5 (link)) including the following discs: Boronic acid 250 µg, Cloxacillin 500 µg (Neosensitabs, Rosco Diagnostica S/A, Taastrup, Denmark), Cefotetan 30 µg, Aztreonam 30 µg (ATM), Ceftazidime 30 µg (CAZ), Cefepime 30 µg (FEP), Imipenem 10 µg (IPM), Cefoxitin 30 µg (FOX), Cefotaxime 30 µg (CTX), Ceftriaxone 30 µg (CRO), Cefpodoxime 10 µg (CPD) [Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.], Augmentin 30 µg (Aug) (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, UK), Ceftazidime with Clavulanic Acid (30 µg,10 µg) (CAZ+CLAV), Cefotaxime with Clavulanic Acid (30 µg, 10 µg) (CTX+CLAV), piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ), (Bio-Rad, Marnes-La-Coquette, France). Distance between Cloxacillin, and each of CAZ and FOX, and that between Boronic acid 250 µg and each of the two combination discs (Ceftazidime and Cefotaxime with Clavulanic Acid) were 10 mm edge to edge (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by disk diffusion (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by in house broth microdilution (colistin, chloramphenicol, florfenicol, flumequine and oxytetracycline) and E-test® (fosfomycin; bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA), as previously described [55 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Screening for ESBL-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Screening for ESBL-E was performed by inoculating rectal swabs on selective medium supplemented with ceftazidime (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). After 24 h at 37 °C, the species were identified by MALDI-TOF (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionisation, time-of-flight mass spectrometry) analysis. Antibiotic susceptibility was tested using the standard agar diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) according to CA-SFM 2012 guidelines. The following antibiotics (bioRad) were tested: amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefalotine, cefoxitine, moxalactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, cefepime, imipenem, ertapenem, meropenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin amikacin, nalidixic acid, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole. The double-disk synergy method was used to confirm ESBL production [25 (link)]. All ESBL-E − producing isolates were stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by Kirby-Bauer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method for 16 antibiotics, namely ampicillin (10 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), moxifloxacin (5 µg), piperacillin (100 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25 + 23.75 µg), tobramycin (10 µg), and piperacillin-tazobactam (10 µg) (Bio-Rad, Feldkirchen, Germany), and read using the ADAGIO 93400 automated system (Bio-Rad, Feldkirchen, Germany). The readings were interpreted as resistant, intermediate (susceptible with increased exposure), or susceptible according to the respective breakpoints for every organism in the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [42 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by disc diffusion on Mueller–Hinton agar, in accordance with the guidelines of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (CA-SFM & EUCAST, 2014 ). The following 32 antimicrobial drugs (Bio-Rad) were tested: ampicillin, ticarcillin, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefamandole, cefoperazone, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, streptomycin, spectinomycin, kanamycin, amikacin, gentamicin, netilmicin, tigecycline, isepamicin, nalidixic acid, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, tetracycline and azithromycin. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin and azithromycin were determined by Etests (bioMérieux). E. coli CIP 76.24 (ATCC 25922) was used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to the 2016 recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology1. Disk diffusion method was performed for amikacin, amoxicillin +/- clavulanic acid, aztreonam, cefalotin, cefepime, cefoxitin, cefpirom, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, colistin, cotrimoxazole, fosfomycin, gentamicin, imipenem, isepamicin, levofloxacin, moxalactam, nalidixic acid, netilmicin, ofloxacin, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, tetracycline, ticarcillin +/- clavulanic acid, and tobramycin (Bio-Rad®). E-test (bioMérieux®) was performed when inhibition zone diameters were observed around disks, and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) results that differed by more than two dilutions were considered as different. For ciprofloxacin, MICs were determined by the agar dilution reference method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!