The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using amp maxspec kit

1

Charge-Tagging of Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All organic solvents and reagents were purchased commercially and used without further purification. FA standards and AMP+ MaxSpec Kit were purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). Charge-tagging PB reagents, including 2-, 3-, and 4-acpy, 1-(5-(fluoro)pyridin-2-yl)ethanone (5-F-2-acpy), 1-(5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl)ethanone (5-CF3-2-acpy), and 2-benzoylpyridine (bzpy) were purchased from Bidepharm (Shanghai, China). 3-Acetyl-1-methylpyridinium (CH3-py) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Pooled normal human plasma with anticoagulant lithium heparin added was obtained from Innovative Research, Inc. (Novi, MI). Plasma samples from T2D patients and normal control were supplied by the specimen bank of Dongfeng Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine. The human studies abided by the Declaration of Helsinki principles. All the procedures related to these samples were compliant with relevant ethical regulations approved by the Ethical Review Board of Tsinghua University (IRB No. 2017007). Yak milk powder was purchased from market (Liaoyuan Dairy LTD, Gansu, China). HPLC grade ACN, methanol (MeOH), and isopropanol (IPA) were purchased from Fisher Scientific Company (Ottawa, ON, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fatty Acid Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were extracted by the Folch method and followed by alkaline hydrolysis to liberate fatty acids. For identification and relative quantification of fatty acids, chemical derivatization of samples spiked with internal standard was performed using N-(4-aminomethylphenyl) pyridinium (AMPP) (AMP + MaxSpec Kit, Cayman Chemical, MI, USA). AMPP-derivatized fatty acids were analyzed by reverse-phase (RP) liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS). For determination of C = C locations in fatty acids, C = C-specific derivatization based on Paternò–Büchi reaction was conducted offline. The reaction solution was collected in vials for subsequent reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC)-MS analysis. All LC-MS analyses were conducted on a LC-20AD system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) connected with an X500R QTOF mass spectrometer (Sciex, Toronto, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lipid Extraction and Analysis in RAW 264.7 Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance LC (HPLC) grade iso-propanol (IPA), acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (MeOH), and water were purchased from Fisher Scientific. Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), formic acid (HCOOH), ammonium formate, and 2-acetylpyridine (2-acpy) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Lipid standards were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids. AMP+ MaxSpec Kit was purchased from Cayman Chemical.
RAW 264.7 macrophages (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC); Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 Medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin solution and collected by centrifugation. The cell pellets were washed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C. For direct inhibition of enzyme activity, RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated for 72 h with 60 μM FADS2 inhibitor (SC26196, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich) and 2.5 μM SCD1 inhibitor (CAY10566, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich), while the control group was treated with DMSO.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Derivatization and LCMS Quantification of SCFAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were derivatized with the AMP + MaxSpec Kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, USA, 710000) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the samples were derivatized by adding 20 l of acetonitrile/dimethylformamide, 20 l of 1-ethyl-3-(3dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide, 10 l of 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (Sigma-Aldrich), and 30 l of the AMP + reagent. The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at 60°C. Samples were stored at -20°C before analysis. AMP + -derivatized SCFAs were separated on a Hypercarb column (3 m, 100 × 2.1 mm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, 35003-031030) using a gradient of solvent A (5% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (100% acetonitrile). After 5 min of 100% solvent A, the proportion of solvent B was increased to 100% within 15 min at a flow rate of 200 l/min at 30°C. Quantification of SCFA was performed by LC-ESI-MS (Alliance HT Waters 2790 with Waters Micromass ZQ 4000, Waters, Eschborn, Germany, 176004001) using the selected ion recording mode for the AMP + signals 227 (acetic acid), 241 (propionic acid), 255 (butyric acid), and 269 (valeric acid) (Sigma-Aldrich). For absolute quantification, an SCFA standard calibration mixture (WSFA-2; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, 46975-U) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!