The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using spinosad

1

Insecticide Bioassay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three formulated insecticides used for bioassays included spinosad (25 g L−1 SC, Dow AgroSciences, Shanghai, China), spinetoram (60 g L−1 SC, Dow AgroSciences, Shanghai, China), and abamectin (20 g L−1 EC, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China). The non-ionic detergent Triton X-100 was purchased from Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Efficacy of Insecticides against S. exigua

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nine insecticides were selected because of their use for control of S. exigua: emamectin benzoate (90%; Nanjing Redsun, China); spinosad (90%; Dow AgroSciences, China); indoxacarb (94%; DuPont, China); chlorpyrifos (97%; Dow AgroSciences, China); alpha-cypermethrin (99%; Shandong Dacheng Pesticide, China); tebufenozide (95%; Dow AgroSciences, China); chlorfenapyr (94.5%; BASF Aktiengesellschaft, China); chlorantraniliprole (95.3%; DuPont, China); methomyl (98%; Jiangsu Changlong Chemicals, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spinosad and Spinetoram: Natural Insecticides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spinosad (Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN) is a natural insecticide derived from the fermentation of a strain of Saccharo-polyspora spinosa. A mixture of spinosyns A and D, which make up the active ingredients of Spinosad, are extracted from the fermentation broth. Spinetoram is a mixture of chemically modi ed spinosyns J and L. Spinosyns J and L are obtained after fermentation of a mutant strain of Saccharopolyspora spinosa that produces primarily spinosyns J and L, instead of spinosyns A and D. Spinosyns J and L then undergo two chemical synthesis steps to produce the nal product, spinetoram.
Both Spinosad and spinetoram are neurotoxic and the mode of action is to disrupt the nicotinic and GABA-gated chloride channels (Galm and Sparks 2016) .
The USEPA considers Spinosad and spinetoram to be "toxicologically equivalent" and that the major risk they pose is to freshwater invertebrates, but only after chronic exposure (USEPA 2009).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Insecticide Compounds Sourcing and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metaflumizone (240 g/L SC) was obtained from the BASF Chemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Indoxacarb (95%), abamectin (95%), beta-cypermethrin (96.1%), chlorfluazuron (95%), chlorfenapyr (95%), diafenthiuron (98%), and chlorantraniliprole (95%) were purchased from Hubei Kangbaotai Fine-Chemicals Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Spinetoram (60 g/L SC) and spinosad (25 g/L SC) were purchased from the Dow AgroSciences Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). BT WG-001 (16000 IU/mg) was supplied by the Hubei Biopesticide Engineering Research Center. The following were obtained from the Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd. (St. Louis, MO, USA): triphenyl phosphate (TPP, reagent grade); diethyl maleate (DEM, reagent grade); piperonyl butoxide (PBO, reagent grade); 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB); reduced glutathione (GSH); fast blue B salt; sodium-dodecyl sulphate (SDS); dithiothreitol (DTT); eserine; phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Alpha-naphthol acetate (α-NA) and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) were purchased from the Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) was obtained from Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. (San Francisco, CA, USA). The protein-assay dye reagent was provided by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spinosad Toxicity Profiling in Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five to seven days old, adult male and female flies were subjected to a non-choice feeding test with spinosad (88%, 76.1% spinosyn A and 11.9% spinosyn D, DOW AgroSciences). The insecticide were diluted with analytic-grade acetone and impregnated on. Susceptible male and female flies were given spinosad in dose 0.063 mg per g sugar and male and female flies from the field populations 766b and 845b were given spinosad in dose 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg per g sugar, respectively. Males and females of multi-resistant strain 791a were given respectively 0.5 mg and 2 mg spinosad per g sugar [17] .
All flies had access to water, milk and sugar ad libitum before trials. Flies, which were alive at day 5 (130–500 flies) were placed in cages with full access to water and were given excess of spinosad-treated granular sugar in a small petri-dish as the only food. The feeding tests were carried out at 25–26°C, 60–65% RH in continuous light. Twenty-four hours upon test start living and fresh looking flies were collected by vacuum suction, immediately sedated by cold and killed at –20°C. The flies were hereafter kept on –80°C until RNA extraction.
Parallel experimental set-ups were performed with resistant and susceptible flies, with the one exception that the sugar offered were left acetone-coated. These flies served as reference for examinations of constitutive gene expression levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Organic Spinosad Application for Insect Pests

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spinosad was obtained from Dow-Agro-sciences as Tracer 24% ® formulation. Spinosad has already been organically certified (Racke 2007) and is being used against many insect pests, especially different fruit fly species (Abd-Elgawad 2021).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Concentration-response Bioassays for Insecticide Toxicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Feeding bioassays were performed with lambda-cyhalothrin (KarateZeon 10% p/v (100 g/L), Syngenta Limited, Surrey, UK) and spinosad (Dow AgroSciences 88% p/p, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Adult flies 3–5 days old were tested. Five concentrations of each insecticide were tested in concentration–response assays. They were prepared by adding 1 mL of the diluted insecticide to 0.9 g of the rearing diet without water and homogenizing in a mortar. Dilutions of insecticides were prepared with water in the case of lambda-cyhalothrin, and with a buffer composed of acetic acid: sodium acetate (1:3, pH 4.7) in the case of spinosad. These solvents (water or buffer) were mixed with the rearing diet for the non-treated controls. Three replicates of 10–15 flies per replica were performed at each concentration. During the assays, flies were kept in ventilated plastic dishes (89 mm in diameter and 23 mm in height) at standard conditions. Flies were starved for 24 h before the exposure to insecticide. Mortality was recorded after 48 h and flies were considered dead if they were ataxic.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!