The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti cd4 apc antibody

1

Calcium Mobilization and CD5 Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calcium mobilization was also measured using flow cytometry and the high affinity calcium indicator Fluo-4 (ex:470–490 nm and em: 520–540 nm). Cells were surface stained with an anti-CD4+-APC antibody (17–0041; eBioscience). T cells were loaded for 30 mins as previously published with pluronic acid and 1mM Fluo-4-acetoxymethyl ester (Invitrogen) in Ringer solution (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM glucose, 5 mM of HEPES, 5 mM of KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) [35 (link)]. Intracellular calcium mobilization was initiated by adding 50 ng/ml of PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate) and 1 μg/mml of ionomycin [36 (link)]. For further analysis done in FlowJo, the lymphocyte population was gated in a forward and side scatter gate and singlets. From this gate a second gate was created specific for CD4+ T cells [37 (link)]. Intracellular calcium flux was measured in the CD4+ T cell gate using the FlowJo kinetics tool.
For CD5 expression analysis, spleen single cell suspensions from naïve and stimulated (day 3 and day 8) were stained with anti-CD5-PE (12–0051; eBioscience), and anti-CD4-APC (17–0041; eBioscience) and analyzed on the flow cytometer (BD Accurri C6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunophenotyping of Transplant Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six days after transplantation, the recipient mice were sacri ced, and spleen and kidney samples were collected and prepared into single-cell suspension. Cells were incubated with anti-CD4-APC antibody and anti-Foxp3-PE antibody following the instructions (eBiosciences). Data were collected and analyzed with ow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences, USA) [25] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Purification of CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were anesthetized by i.p. injection of a mixture of 10 mg/kg xylazine (MTC Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, ON, Canada) and 200 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride (Rogar/STB, London, ON, Canada). The anaesthetized mice were sacrificed with cervical dissociation. The spleen was removed, ground and prepared into single cell suspensions. CD4+ T cells in the spleen were sorted using CD4 (L3T4) micro beads (130-049-201, Miltenyi Biotec, United States). Briefly, the single cell suspensions were incubated with CD4 (L3T4) micro beads. The magnetically labeled cells were flushed and collected. Finally, the purity of CD4+ T cells was quantified using anti-CD4-APC antibodies (17-0041-81, eBioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analysis of Murine T-Cell Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 28 d after the first immunization, splenic lymphocytes were harvested from the immunized mice, were incubated in 24-well plates (1 mL per well, 1 × 106 cells/mL), and were stimulated using OVA (50 mg/mL) for 72 h. Then, the cells were stained using fluorescein-labeled antibodies, including anti-CD3e-FITC, anti-CD8-PE, and anti-CD4-APC antibodies (eBioscience). The stained cells were assessed for the percentages of CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Profiling Rat Liver Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rat liver lymphocyte were processed with the Optiprep Nycoprep Lymphoprep Kit (Axis-Shield, Oslo, Norway), and stained with the indicated antibodies for assessment by flow cytometry. For assessment of the cell surface molecules, the anti-CD3 FITC and anti-CD4 APC antibodies (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) were used. The Fixation/Permeabilization Kit (eBioscience) was used to immune-stain the intracellular molecules with anti-IL-22 PE, anti-IL-17 PE and anti-FOXP3 PE (eBioscience). For IL-22 andIL-17 staining, the cells were pretreated using the following procedure: cells were first cultured in DMEM and then stimulated for 6 h with 50ng/mL PMA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 500ng/mL ionomycin (Sigma) in the presence of 1μL/mL GolgiStop (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). FACS analyses were carried out with a FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo analysis software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!