The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Filtek supreme ultra

Manufactured by 3M
Sourced in United States

Filtek Supreme Ultra is a light-cured, nano-filled composite resin material designed for use in anterior and posterior restorations. It is formulated to provide high strength, excellent polish retention, and long-lasting aesthetics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using filtek supreme ultra

1

Resin Composite Bonding to Enamel and Dentin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A two‐step self‐etch adhesive system, OptiBond eXTRa (2‐step SE, Kerr), and a universal adhesive, Scotchbond Universal (Universal Adhesive, 3 M Oral Care), were used in this laboratory study to bond a resin composite (Filtek Supreme Ultra, 3 M Oral Care) to both enamel and dentin. The adhesive systems (Table 1) were used for determining both macro static bond strengths and dynamic bond strengths.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Evaluation of CAD/CAM Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight CAD/CAM blocks including five composite resin blocks (Block HC [BLO, Shofu, Kyoto, Japan], Cerasmart [CER, GC, Tokyo, Japan], Gradia Block [GRA, GC], KZR-CAD Hybrid Resin Block [KZR, Yamamota Precious Metal, Osaka, Japan], Lava Ultimate [ULT, 3M/ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA]), one hybrid ceramic block (Vita Enamic [ENA, Vita Zahnfabrik GMbH, Bad Säckingen, Germany]), one PMMA block (Telio CAD [TEL, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein]), and one feldspar ceramic block (Vitablocs Mark II [VIT, Vita Zahnfabrik GMbH]) and four conventional restorative composite resins (one hybrid composite Clearfil AP-X [APX, Kuraray, Okayama, Japan], one microfilled composite Durafill VS [DUR, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany], and two nanohybrid composites Estelite Sigma Quick [ESQ, Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan] and Filtek Supreme Ultra [FSU, 3M/ESPE]), were examined in the present study. The materials and their compositions, published by the respective manufacturers are shown in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Bulk Fill and Composite Resins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two types of RBC were used, an IVA shade of Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Amherst, NY) and a A2B shade of Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN). All specimens were light-cured using a Valo LED LCU (Ultradent, South Jordan, UT) (Table 1) with the light tip placed directly over each specimen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Adhesive Performance on Enamel and Dentin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adhesives used are shown in Table 1. A three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, OptiBond FL (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA), a two-step E&R adhesive, Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA), a two-step self-etch adhesive, Clearfil SE Bond 2, a two-step universal adhesive, G2-BOND Universal (GC), and a one-step universal adhesive, Scotchbond Universal Plus (3M Oral Care, St. Paul, MN, USA) were used to bond a resin composite (Filtek Supreme Ultra, 3M Oral Care) to both enamel and dentin. In addition, phosphoric acid etchant (UltraEtch, Ultradent Products, South Jordan, UT, USA) was used. Adhesives, except for the universal adhesives, were applied in either etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode and universal adhesives were used in both modes based on the manufacturers’ instructions in this laboratory study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biomineralization of Dentin Adhesives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sound human third molars (IRB no. 2018–0346) were selected and ground flat with silicon carbide (SiC) abrasive paper (180-, 320-grit, Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) to remove the occlusal enamel and expose mid-coronal dentin. Dentin surfaces were polished (600-grit for 20 seconds) to produce a smear layer. Specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 8) according to the experimental adhesive. Dentin surfaces were etched with 35 wt% glycolic acid (pH = 1.30, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 15 s and rinsed with ultrapure water (15 s). A bioactive primer consisting of 15 wt% VVe diluted in HEPES solution (pH = 7.2) was actively applied for 1 min and rinsed for 15 s. Then, two layers of the experimental adhesive containing 0% (control), 1.5 wt% of sub-micron (SM) or micron (M) VVe-filled PLA spheres were applied, air-dried for solvent evaporation and light cured for 40s (600 mW/cm2, Optilux 501, Kerr Corp., Brea, CA, USA). A commercial light-curable resin composite (Filtek Supreme Ultra, Lot: N820171, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MO, USA) was used to incrementally build a crown-like block. All specimens were immersed in simulated body fluid (SBF: 50 mM HEPES, 5 mM CaCl2·2 H2O, 0.001 mM ZnCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 3 mM NaN3, pH = 7.4) [20 (link)], at 37°C. SBF was replaced every 15 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bulk-fill and Conventional Composite Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study evaluated two RBC materials [Table 1]:

Bulk-fill RBC, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TBF), shade IVA (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Amherst, NY, USA)

Conventional nanocomposite RBC, Filtek Supreme Ultra (FS), shade A2B (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA).

The manufacturer of TBF claims that this bulk-fill RBC can be cured in up to 4-mm increments, whereas the manufacturer of FS recommends only 2 mm of thickness. This investigation tested TBF at 2- and 4-mm thicknesses and at a 2-mm thickness for the FS. All specimens were light-cured by means of a high-power LED, Valo (Ultradent, UT, USA), in three curing powers [Figure 1 and Table 2].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluation of PMTC Paste Abrasiveness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Table 1 shows the materials used in this study. Two one-step PMTC pastes, Clinpro Cleaning Paste for PMTC (CP, 3M Japan, Tokyo, Japan) and PRG Pro-Care Gel (PG, Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan), were used. For multiple-step PMTC pastes, pastes with different RDA values, Merssage Regular (MR, Shofu Inc.), Merssage Fine (MF, Shofu Inc.), and Merssage Plus (MP, Shofu Inc.), were used. The subjected materials used were bovine enamel, bovine dentin, Filtek Supreme Ultra (FSU, 3M Oral Care, St. Paul, MN, USA) as a resin composite, and IPS e.max CAD (IEC, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein) as a lithium disilicate ceramic. For polymerized FSU, a halogen-quartz-tungsten curing unit (Optilux 501; SDS Kerr, Danbury, CT, USA) was used. The light intensity (600 mW/cm 2 ) of the curing unit was checked using a dental radiometer (Model 100, Kerr, Danbury).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!