The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gateway bp clonase 2 enzyme mix

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, China

The Gateway BP Clonase II Enzyme Mix is a laboratory tool designed for the recombination of DNA fragments. It facilitates the transfer of DNA sequences between entry and destination vectors during the Gateway cloning process. The enzyme mix catalyzes the site-specific recombination reaction, allowing for efficient and accurate DNA cloning.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

95 protocols using gateway bp clonase 2 enzyme mix

1

Gateway Cloning of Pr-set7 in Drosophila

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gateway® BP Clonase® II Enzyme mix (Invitrogen) was used for the generation of entry clone plasmids. cDNA clones were used in this study (Drosophila Genomics Resource Centre [DGRC]). Briefly, genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) first. Then, the amplified fragment was inserted into Gateway vector pDONR221 (Invitrogen) using Gateway BP Clonase II Enzyme mix to generate entry vector pDONR211‐Pr‐Set7. Subsequently, the fragment in the entry vector was inserted into Gateway destination vectors (pUAST) by LR recombination using Gateway LR Clonase II enzyme mix. The plasmids generated were pUAST‐Pr‐set7. Primers used for generating entry clones were as follows:

BP.Pr‐set7.F: GGGG ACA AGT TTG TAC AAA AAA GCA GGC TTC ATGATAATGG TGCGAAGACG A.

BP.Pr‐set7.R: GGGG AC CAC TTT GTA CAA GAA AGC TGG GTC TCAGAA GGCCAACCAA GGATG.

UAS‐Pr‐set7 transgenic flies were generated by standard P‐element‐mediated transformation by BestGenes, Inc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Construction of S. aureus ΔtagN Mutant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tagN mutant (ΔTN) in S. aureus WH39 was constructed by allelic replacement using the pKOR1 shuttle vector as described previously (41 (link)). The approximately 1-kb upstream and downstream fragments of the tagN gene were amplified separately by PCR using chromosomal DNA of S. aureus WH39 as a template. Primers used for gene deletion are listed in Table S4. The above amplification products were purified and spliced by fusion PCR, and then recombined on vector pKOR1 using the Gateway BP ClonaseTM II enzyme mix (Invitrogen Corp., CA, USA). Recombinant plasmid pKOR1-ΔtagN was transformed into S. aureus WH39 via electroporation to obtain the ΔTN strain. The allelic replacement mutant was checked by PCR and DNA sequencing. The S. aureus-E. coli shuttle vector pTSSCm was used to construct the expression of plasmid pTSSCm-tagN at BamHI and XhoI sites (primers; see Table S4) (42 (link)). The resulting constructs were then transformed into ΔTN via electroporation to obtain the tagN mutant complementation (c-ΔTN). The complementation was identified by PCR and DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Construction of CDC42 Deletion and Complementation Plasmids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The backbone plasmids p0380-bar and p0380-sur-gateway [42 (link)] were used to construct plasmids for cdc42 deletion and complementation. Briefly, the 5’ and 3´ fragments (1428 and 1819 bp, respectively) of cdc42 comprising partial coding and flanking regions were amplified from the WT DNA with paired primers (Table S1) and inserted into p0380-bar at the XmaI/BamHI and XbaI/SpeI sites, respectively, forming p0380-5´cdc42-bar-3´cdc42. The full-length sequence of cdc42 and its flanking regions (3501 bp in total) were amplified from the WT DNA and inserted into the p0380-sur-gateway to exchange for the gateway fragment under the action of Gateway BP ClonaseTM II Enzyme Mix (Invitrogen), yielding p0380-sur-cdc42 vectoring the sur marker. The two constructed plasmids were propagated in E. coli Top10 and E. coli DH5α and transformed into the WT and the Δcdc42 mutant via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation [18 (link)], respectively. Putative mutants were screened in terms of the bar resistance to phosphinothricin (200 μg/mL) or the sur resistance to chlorimuron ethyl (15 μg/mL) in a selective medium. The expected recombination events (Figure S1A) were verified by PCR (Figure S1B) with paired primers (Table S1). Positive Δcdc42 mutant and its control strains (parental WT and Δcdc42::cdc42) were used in phenotypic experiments including three independent replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Construction of S. aureus ΔtagN Mutant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tagN mutant (ΔTN) in S. aureus WH39 was constructed by allelic replacement using the pKOR1 shuttle vector as described previously (41 (link)). The approximately 1-kb upstream and downstream fragments of the tagN gene were amplified separately by PCR using chromosomal DNA of S. aureus WH39 as a template. Primers used for gene deletion are listed in Table S4. The above amplification products were purified and spliced by fusion PCR, and then recombined on vector pKOR1 using the Gateway BP ClonaseTM II enzyme mix (Invitrogen Corp., CA, USA). Recombinant plasmid pKOR1-ΔtagN was transformed into S. aureus WH39 via electroporation to obtain the ΔTN strain. The allelic replacement mutant was checked by PCR and DNA sequencing. The S. aureus-E. coli shuttle vector pTSSCm was used to construct the expression of plasmid pTSSCm-tagN at BamHI and XhoI sites (primers; see Table S4) (42 (link)). The resulting constructs were then transformed into ΔTN via electroporation to obtain the tagN mutant complementation (c-ΔTN). The complementation was identified by PCR and DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Knockout of Transporter Genes glpT and uhpT in S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Knockout of the transporter genes glpT and uhpT was conducted as previously described (Bae and Schneewind, 2005 (link); Wang et al., 2015 (link)). The plasmids and primers used are listed in Tables 1, 2, respectively. Proper gene deletion was verified by analytical polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing of the genomic DNA at the borders of the PCR-derived regions. Sequencing was then performed to confirm the nucleotides. The amplified fragments were used to construct the homologous recombinant pKOR1-ΔuhpT/glpT with Gateway®BP ClonaseTM II Enzyme mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States).
pKOR1-ΔuhpT and pKOR1-ΔglpT were introduced into S. aureus RN4220 by electroporation for modification. The plasmid extracted from strain RN4220 was then introduced into S. aureus Newman. The desired uhpT and glpT deletion mutants were selected as described previously (Bae and Schneewind, 2005 (link)).
The successful generation of the Newman-ΔuhpT and Newman-ΔglpT strains was further confirmed by PCR and sequencing. PCRs were performed using the primers attB1-uhpT-up-F/attB2-uhpT-CF and attB1-glpT-up-F/attB2-glpT-CF in the strains S. aureus Newman, Newman-ΔuhpT, and Newman-ΔglpT, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Construction of vraSR Deletion Mutant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The vraSR deletion mutant strain was constructed as described previously (Li et al., 2017 (link)). Briefly, the upstream and downstream fragments of vraSR were amplified from S. aureus Mu3 genomic DNA using the vraSR-UF/vraSR-UR and vraSR-DF/vraSR-DR primer sets, respectively, and ligated by overlap extension polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to form an up-down fragment. The resulting fragment was recombined into the temperature-sensitive shuttle plasmid pKOR1 using Gateway® BP ClonaseTM II Enzyme Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to generate recombinant plasmid pKOR1-vraSR. pKOR1-vraSR was then transformed into S. aureus strain RN4220 by electroporation for modification and then transformed into S. aureus strain Mu3. The mutant strains that had allelic replacement were screened via high temperature and anhydrotetracycline-resistant and chloramphenicol-sensitive colonies and were further confirmed by PCR, quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and sequencing. All primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In vivo expression of NAC052 from GLDT promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The promoter of the GLDT gene from F. trinervia was inserted in the pAUL1 vector (Lyska et al., 2013 (link)). The coding sequence of NAC052 was isolated from cDNA from the Columbia-0 accession of A. thaliana using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online.
To introduce the (truncated) NAC052 coding sequence (CDS) into the Gateway entry vector pDONR221, the BP Clonase reaction (Gateway ‘BP Clonase II’ enzyme mix, ThermoFisher Scientific) was carried out as described by the manufacturer. The resulting pENTRY221-(truncated)NAC052 was subsequently used for the LR Clonase reaction (Gateway ‘LR Clonase II’ enzyme mix, ThermoFisher Scientific) to transfer the (truncated )NAC052 CDS into pAUL1-GLDTFt (pAUL1-GLDTFt::NAC052 and pAUL1-GLDTFt::5'truncatedNAC052).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Investigating mprF Mutation Effect on Drug Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the effect of the mprF mutation (L291I), identified in DAPR isolates of each patient, on drug susceptibility, gene replacement was performed using the pKOR1 plasmid30 (link),80 (link). In brief, mprF genes were amplified from each H-1 (DAPS) and H-5 (DAPR) strain with primer sets listed in Supplemental Table 3. The PCR fragments were individually cloned into the pKOR1 plasmid using Gateway BP Clonase II enzyme mix (Thermo Scientific, USA), and recombinant plasmids were selected through CcdB-based positive selection system in Escherichia coli DH5α. The plasmid-carrying wild-type mprF gene was then introduced into DAPR strain H-5, while the mutated mprF gene was transformed into DAPS strain H-3. This was achieved by electroporation using NEPA21 electroporator (NEPAGENE, Japan) following the parameters reported previously81 (link). Chromosomal gene replacement involved single-crossover plasmid integration at 43°C followed by overnight incubation in drug-free medium at 37°C to eliminate the plasmid. Anhydrotetracycline was used to select for non-plasmid-carrying mutants. The presence of gene mutations was confirmed by PCR and targeted gene sequencing with an ABI3130 × 1 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cloning Doxycycline-Inducible MFSD1-eGFP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For C-terminal tagging MFSD1 was PCR amplified from cDNA prepared from dendritic cells (a gift from M. Sixt lab) (Fw primer:GATCTCGAGATGGAGGACGAGGATG; Rv primer: CGACCGGTAACTCTGGATGAGAGAGC) and digested with XhoI and AgeI (both New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massasuchetts, USA). This MFSD1 fragment was cloned into XhoI/AgeI digested peGFP-N1 (Addgene, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA). C-terminally eGFP tagged MFSD1 was further PCR amplified (Fw primer: GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTAATGGAGGACGAGGAT; Rv primer: GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTATTACTTGTACAGCTC). This fragment was cloned using Gateway BP Clonase II Enzyme mix and Gateway LR Clonase II Enzyme Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) via donor vector pDonR211 into the final Doxycyclin inducible expression vector pInducer20 (Meerbrey et al., 2011 (link)) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. pInducer20-MFSD1-eGFP was amplified in stbl3 bacteria (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cloning E. cheiranthoides Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Erysimum cheiranthoides RNA was extracted from 2-week-old seedlings and young leaves of 5-week-old plants using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI). cDNA was generated using SMARTScribe Reverse Transcriptase (Takara Bio USA, Ann Arbor, MI). Primers were ordered to include Gateway attB recombination sites (Supplemental Table S1), and the coding sequence was amplified from cDNA using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). The gel-purified amplicon was inserted into the pDONR207 vector using Gateway BP Clonase II enzyme mix and then into pEAQ-HT-DEST1 (Sainsbury et al., 2009 (link)) using Gateway LR Clonase II enzyme mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The sequences of the inserted genes were verified with Sanger sequencing. All cloning was done using 10-beta Competent E. coli (NEB, Ipswich, MA), with transformations done using heat shock at 42 °C. Plasmids were purified using the Wizard Plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification System (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) and transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 using a freeze-thaw method (Weigel & Glazebrook, 2006 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!