The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

54 protocols using nova nanosem 430

1

Multimodal Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning
electron microscope (SEM) images
were obtained with an FEI NovaNano SEM 430 at an accelerating voltage
of 10 kV. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared
(ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy was performed with a Thermo Scientific Nicolet
6700 FTIR spectrometer. Raman spectra were acquired using a Renishaw
inVia Raman microscope with a 100 mW 532 nm laser excitation source.
A 10% excitation power density was applied to avoid damage to the
surface. Fluorescence microscopy images were collected with a laser
scanning confocal microscope (Nikon Instrument TIRF with Ti-U system).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cross-sectional SEM Imaging of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Deposited films of iron oxide nanoparticles on Au/Ti/Si substrates were prepared for cross sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM), by first mounting each substrate onto a glass slide (25.4 × 25.4 mm) with double sided tape. A poly (vinyl) alcohol layer was then spin coated, with a G3P Spincoater (Speciality Coating Systems, Inc.), onto the films so the film would stay intact during cleaving for cross-sectional SEM. A 1 wt% PVA solution was prepared in water and dispensed onto the film, and was spin coated at 1,500 rpm. After spin-coating was complete, the substrates were removed from the glass slide and were cleaved and mounted on 45° stubs.
Cross-sectional SEM was performed on the deposited films with a FEI Nova NanoSEM 430 at an accelerating voltage of 5 keV. Each substrate was tilted to 45–50°. A total of 10 images were taken of each deposited film at different regions across the entire film. The acquired images were analyzed with ImageJ software, with 10 measurements of the cross-sectional thickness per image, resulting in 100 measurements per film. For each set of experimental conditions, three samples were made, resulting in 300 measurements for each experimental group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural Characterization of Ba-La-Co-Mn Oxides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal
structures of the series of BaxLa2–xCoMnO6−δ (x = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2) were studied by powder
X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku) with Cu Kα radiation (l = 1.5406 Å) in a 2θ range of 10–90°.
The refinement of the XRD patterns was conducted with the Rietveld
refinement method using the EXPGUI interface and GSAS program. The
morphology and microstructure of the samples were characterized using
a field-emission high-resolution transmission electron microscope
(Tecnai G2 F30) and a high-resolution field-emission scanning electron
microscope (FEI Nova NanoSEM 430). High-resolution transmission electron
microscopy (HRTEM) was used to obtain high-resolution and high-angle
annular dark-field (HAADF) micrographs and corresponding energy-dispersive
spectroscopy (EDS) element mapping and also selected area electron
diffraction (SAED) patterns. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) method within the relative pressure range P/P0 = 0.06–0.30 was used to calculate
the specific areas. The chemical composition, nature of the perovskite
oxides, and work function measurements were studied using X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS, PHI 5000 Versa Probe spectrometer) with Al Kα
radiation. All the peaks were calibrated with a standard C 1s spectrum
at 284.6 eV. For work function measurements, a previous approach was
applied.56 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of MoC@N-HCS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology and structure of the prepared materials were analyzed using scanning electron microscopes (SEM, FEI Nova NanoSEM 430, 15 kV) and transmission electron microscopes (TEM, Tecnai F20, 200 kV). The element distribution was obtained using the Energy Dispersive Spectrometer. XRD data were collected on a Rigaku diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation at room temperature. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves were obtained using a NETZSCH STA 449 C thermo-balance. MoC content of MoC@N-HCS was tested in the air from room temperature to 1000 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1, while the sulfur content in the MoC@N-HCS/S was determined in Ar from room temperature to 600 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using an ESCALAB 250Xi (Thermo Fisher) instrument with a monochromated Al Kα radiation analysis was proceeded to analyze the elemental composition and valence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BPs concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (Agilent 8800, Tokyo, Japan), as described in our studies. SEM imaging was performed on a field-emission SEM (NOVA NANOSEM430, FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands) at 5–10 kV after gold coating for 120 s (EM-SCD500, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). TEM imaging was assessed using a high resolution JEOL JEM 2010 F TEM (Hitachi Scientific Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). The ultraviolet–visible–near infrared (UV–vis–NIR) absorption spectra were obtained on a UV–vis–NIR spectrometer with integrating sphere attachment (ISR-2600 Plus; Shimadzu UV-2600, Kyoto, Japan). The FTIR spectra were recorded with a Thermo-Nicolet Nexus 6700 FTIR spectrometer (Madison, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanoparticle Microstructure Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nanoparticle dispersions were freeze-dried, and the resulting powders were fixed to a sample holder and then sputter-coated with gold. The microstructures of the samples were then characterized using a field emission scanning electron microscope operating at an accelerating voltage of 10.0 kV (NovaNanoSEM 430, FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Micro- and Nanoscale Electrode Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate micro- and nanoscale morphological features of the fabricated samples, high magnification images (100k× magnification) were taken using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; FEI Nova NanoSEM430). The top and cross-sectional images of varying electrode morphology samples were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health shareware, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html) in order to determine the median pore size17 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

CO2/CH4 Gas Separation Membrane Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cross-section topographies of the PDMS/PSf and PPPS/PDMS/PSf composite membranes were screened by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Nova NanoSEM 430, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The functional groups of the membranes were evaluated by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (FTS-6000, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The CO2/CH4 mixed gas separation performance was estimated by the laboratory-made gas permeance analysis platform. As shown in Figure 1, the prepared CO2/CH4 mixed gases with different CO2 concentrations served as the feed gas flow into membrane cell at a set pressure. The CO2-rich penetrate gas driven by He was analyzed in the gas chromatograph (7890B, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with a certain flow rate. The ratio of humidified gas (saturated) and dry gas in the feed gas can be controlled by adjusting the precision needle valve, thereby controlling the relative humidity of the feed gas. All error bars represented the standard errors of the performance of three membranes prepared under the same conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM imaging of the samples was performed on a Nova NanoSEM 430 (FEI; Thermo Fisher). The images were taken at tilt (45º) or top views with an electron beam acceleration voltage of 3–5 kV and a current of 28 and 80 pA, while using a secondary electron detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of ACS Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of ACS was examined by transmission electron microscopy ([TEM], JEM-2100F; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The nanoparticles were uniformly immersed in collagen solution and then dropped on copper grids (400 mesh size), dried at room temperature, and then examined using TEM. The average particle dimensions of the nanoparticles were characterized by the dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique.
The morphological characteristics of the ACS-CCM were observed using scanning electron microscopy ([SEM]; Nova NanoSEM 430, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The obverse side, the reverse side, and the cross-section were all examined. Before observation, the membranes were sputter-coated with gold under an argon atmosphere using a sputter coater (K575XD, Emitech, Quorum Technologies Ltd., East Sussex, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!