Immunohistochemistry was conducted using the OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit and an automated staining system, the Ventana Benchmark ULTRA (Ventana Medical Systems, Oro Valley, AZ, USA), following previously established protocols.42 (link),43 (link) With this published protocol, the kidney samples were stained using an anti-HLA class I antibody (clone TP25.99SF, Bio-Techne). For verification purposes, an anti-HLA class I with a different clone (clone EMR8-5, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was also employed.
Optiview universal dab detection kit
The OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit is a laboratory product designed for use in immunohistochemistry (IHC) procedures. It provides a universal detection system for the visualization of target antigens in tissue samples. The kit includes the necessary reagents to perform the detection process, enabling researchers and clinicians to visualize specific biomolecules or cellular structures of interest.
Lab products found in correlation
21 protocols using optiview universal dab detection kit
Immunohistochemical Localization of HLA Class I
Immunohistochemistry was conducted using the OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit and an automated staining system, the Ventana Benchmark ULTRA (Ventana Medical Systems, Oro Valley, AZ, USA), following previously established protocols.42 (link),43 (link) With this published protocol, the kidney samples were stained using an anti-HLA class I antibody (clone TP25.99SF, Bio-Techne). For verification purposes, an anti-HLA class I with a different clone (clone EMR8-5, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was also employed.
PD-L1 IHC Diagnostic Assay Comparison
Interpretation of the 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assays was performed from stained slides by two of the authors (Y.P. and Y.K.) who received appropriate training. PD-L1 expression in the tumor cell membrane and membrane and/or cytoplasm of tumor-associated mononuclear inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes and macrophages was scored. The CPS was defined as the total number of tumor cells and immune cells (including lymphocytes and macrophages) stained with PD-L1 divided by the number of all viable tumor cells, then multiplied by 100 [9 (link)]. Each countable array core section contained at least 100 viable GC cells.
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Neuroendocrine Markers
Stained slides were digitized with a Pannoramic scanner (3DHISTECH) and expression patterns for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and pan keratin were evaluated from the digitized slides as previously described [17 (link)]. The proliferation index was evaluated according to the Ki-67 immunoreactivity in the nuclei of the highest labelling region with the ImmunoRatio image analysis software [18 (link)].
Immunohistochemical Profiling of CVID Gastric Cancer
Automated Immunohistochemical Analysis of ABCB1
In brief, following deparaffinization and heat-induced antigen retrieval with CC1 (#950–500, Ventana) for 32 min, the tissue samples were incubated with the ABCB1 antibody (Company: Novusbio; Type: anti mouse; Clone: OTI1A7; Lot number: W001; Dilution: 1/9,600) for another 32 min at 37°C. Incubation was followed by hematoxylin II counter stain for 8 min and then a blue coloring reagent for 8 min according to the manufactures instructions (Ventana). Positive controls were used on every slide.
After immunohistochemical staining the percentage of positive stained cells of interest and the intensity of the staining per biopsy were evaluated (by R.A.G.v.E. and M.D.). The biopsies were scored according to the immunoreactive score (IRS) described by Remmele and Stegner (Remmele and Stegner, 1987 (link)).
Automated Ki-67 Immunohistochemistry Scoring
Ki‐67‐labeled slides were digitized with a Pannoramic 250 FLASH III whole‐slide scanner (3DHISTECH, Budapest, Hungary) using a 20x objective with a resolution of 0.242 µm/pixel. The digitized images were uploaded to Aiforia® (Aiforia Technologies, Helsinki, Finland), which is a commercial cloud‐based platform for managing and viewing digitized whole‐slide images and for training neural networks for automated image analysis.
Quantitative IHC Analysis of MAO-A in Tumor Samples
Immunohistochemically stained samples were digitalized and four fields of view were representatively selected. Each field of view was exported as an image file on a 10× magnification scale and contained both tumor cells and stroma. The exported images were analyzed using the CellProfiler software (version 3.0,
PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Protocol
Immunohistochemical Tissue Staining Protocol
Immunoreactions were detected using either a polymer-based ultraView or OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) or EnVision Detection System (Dako, Agilent Pathology Solutions, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Automated (BenchMark ULTRA, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) or semi-automated (AutoStainer, Lab Vision Corp., Fremont, CA, USA) staining instruments were used. Appropriate positive controls (pancreas, small intestine) were used for each antibody.
PD-L1 Expression Analysis in LPS
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!