The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using optiview universal dab detection kit

1

Immunohistochemical Localization of HLA Class I

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cellular localization of HLA class I was assessed on paraffin-embedded sections obtained from non-transplantable donor kidneys and peritumoral tissue derived from nephrectomies performed for oncological reasons.
Immunohistochemistry was conducted using the OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit and an automated staining system, the Ventana Benchmark ULTRA (Ventana Medical Systems, Oro Valley, AZ, USA), following previously established protocols.42 (link),43 (link) With this published protocol, the kidney samples were stained using an anti-HLA class I antibody (clone TP25.99SF, Bio-Techne). For verification purposes, an anti-HLA class I with a different clone (clone EMR8-5, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was also employed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PD-L1 IHC Diagnostic Assay Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two PD-L1 IHC diagnostic assays were performed on each specimen according to the manufacturer’s instructions: 22C3 pharmDx (mouse monoclonal primary anti–PD-L1 antibody, prediluted, clone 22C3, Dako, Carpinteria, CA) on the Autostainer Link 48 with EnVision DAB Detection System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), and Ventana SP263 (rabbit monoclonal primary anti–PD-L1 antibody, prediluted, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) on the Benchmark XT staining systems and Ultra with OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems) [8 (link),13 (link)].
Interpretation of the 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assays was performed from stained slides by two of the authors (Y.P. and Y.K.) who received appropriate training. PD-L1 expression in the tumor cell membrane and membrane and/or cytoplasm of tumor-associated mononuclear inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes and macrophages was scored. The CPS was defined as the total number of tumor cells and immune cells (including lymphocytes and macrophages) stained with PD-L1 divided by the number of all viable tumor cells, then multiplied by 100 [9 (link)]. Each countable array core section contained at least 100 viable GC cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Neuroendocrine Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMA sections obtained from the biobanks were immunolabelled for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, pan keratin, and Ki-67 in the clinical pathology laboratory at the Helsinki University Hospital as previously described [17 (link)]. Briefly, the sections were deparaffinized and antigen retrieval was performed using CC1 reagent (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) and/or Protease 3 (Ventana Medical Systems). The primary antibodies (chromogranin A (clone DAK-A3, dilution 1:800, Dako, Agilent Pathology Solutions, Santa Clara, CA), synaptophysin (clone SP11, ready-to-use, Ventana Medical Systems), pan keratin (clone AE1/AE3 & PCK26, ready-to-use, Ventana Medical Systems), and Ki-67 (MIB-1, dilution 1:100, Dako) were incubated, and the immunoreactions were detected using either an ultraView or OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems). All slides were counterstained with haematoxylin.
Stained slides were digitized with a Pannoramic scanner (3DHISTECH) and expression patterns for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and pan keratin were evaluated from the digitized slides as previously described [17 (link)]. The proliferation index was evaluated according to the Ki-67 immunoreactivity in the nuclei of the highest labelling region with the ImmunoRatio image analysis software [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Profiling of CVID Gastric Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serial 3-μm sections were prepared from one representative FFPE block. IHC staining was performed in all CVID and non-CVID gastric cancer cases with antibodies against CMV (clone CCH2 and DDG9, 1:1000; DAKO), CD20, (clone L26, prediluted; Ventana Medical Systems), CD8 (clone SP57, prediluted; Ventana Medical Systems), CD4 (clone SP35, prediluted; Ventana Medical Systems), GATA3 (clone D13C9, 1:200; Cell Signaling Technology), Foxp3 (clone AB54501, 1:100; abcam), CD138/Syndecan-1 (clone B-A38, prediluted; Cell Marque) and PD-L1 (clone 22C3, 1:80; DAKO). Samples were processed in the automatic Ventana Benchmark Ultra platform using an Optiview Universal DAB Detection Kit and an Optiview Amplification Kit for PD-L1 staining. EBV infection was studied using chromogenic ISH for EBV-encoded RNA (EBER-ISH, INFORM EBER probe, Ventana Medical Systems) using the same equipment, with enzymatic digestion (ISH protease) and an iViewBlue detection kit. The detailed protocols are presented in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Automated Immunohistochemical Analysis of ABCB1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the expression of ABCB1 an automated immunostainer (the Ventana Benchmark ULTRA, Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Arizona, United States) was used. Sequential 4 µm thick (FFPE) sections were stained for ABCB1 using Optiview universal DAB detection Kit (#760–700, Ventana).
In brief, following deparaffinization and heat-induced antigen retrieval with CC1 (#950–500, Ventana) for 32 min, the tissue samples were incubated with the ABCB1 antibody (Company: Novusbio; Type: anti mouse; Clone: OTI1A7; Lot number: W001; Dilution: 1/9,600) for another 32 min at 37°C. Incubation was followed by hematoxylin II counter stain for 8 min and then a blue coloring reagent for 8 min according to the manufactures instructions (Ventana). Positive controls were used on every slide.
After immunohistochemical staining the percentage of positive stained cells of interest and the intensity of the staining per biopsy were evaluated (by R.A.G.v.E. and M.D.). The biopsies were scored according to the immunoreactive score (IRS) described by Remmele and Stegner (Remmele and Stegner, 1987 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Automated Ki-67 Immunohistochemistry Scoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical labeling for Ki‐67 was performed at the Department of Pathology, HUH. Briefly, 3.5 µm sections were cut on adhesive slides and deparaffinized. Antigen retrieval was performed using CC1 reagent (Ventana Medical System, Inc., Roche, Tucson, AZ, USA), and the primary antibody Ki‐67 (clone MIB‐1, dilution 1:100, Dako, Agilent Pathology Solutions, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was incubated for 32 min. Immunoreactions were visualized with OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical System) and counterstained with hematoxylin.
Ki‐67‐labeled slides were digitized with a Pannoramic 250 FLASH III whole‐slide scanner (3DHISTECH, Budapest, Hungary) using a 20x objective with a resolution of 0.242 µm/pixel. The digitized images were uploaded to Aiforia® (Aiforia Technologies, Helsinki, Finland), which is a commercial cloud‐based platform for managing and viewing digitized whole‐slide images and for training neural networks for automated image analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative IHC Analysis of MAO-A in Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) was performed on FFPE whole sections of all the analyzed primary tumors and mesenteric metastases. Sequential 4 µm thick FFPE sections were stained for MAO-A (EPR7101, ab126751, 1:3200, Abcam) by automated IHC using the Ventana Benchmark ULTRA (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.). In brief, following deparaffinization and heat-induced antigen retrieval with CC1 (no. 950-500, Ventana) for 64 min the tissue samples were incubated with the antibody of interest for 32 min at 37°C. The staining was developed using Optiview universal DAB detection Kit (no. 760-700, Ventana), followed by hematoxylin II counterstain for 8 min and then a blue coloring reagent for 8 min according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ventana). Positive controls were used on every slide.
Immunohistochemically stained samples were digitalized and four fields of view were representatively selected. Each field of view was exported as an image file on a 10× magnification scale and contained both tumor cells and stroma. The exported images were analyzed using the CellProfiler software (version 3.0, www.cellprofiler.org) (14 (link)). Each image was manually segmented into the tumor and stromal compartments and the average intensity of DAB staining of the segmented area (I/A) was noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC analysis was conducted with the PD‐L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and the Ventana PD‐L1 (SP263) assays on the DAKO Autostainer Link 48 and Ventana BenchMark platforms, respectively. Consecutive 4 μm thick sections cut from the same core specimen were pretreated and stained with the PD‐L1 antibody 22C3 mouse monoclonal primary antibody from pharmDx on a Dako Autostainer Link 48 with EnVision DAB Detection System (Agilent/Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with negative control reagents and cell line run controls, as described in the PD‐L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx, and PD‐L1 antibody SP263 rabbit monoclonal primary antibody from Ventana on a Ventana Benchmark Ultra with OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) with a matched rabbit immunoglobulin G–negative control, in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions, respectively. The detection and quantification of the percentage of immunoreactive tumor cells was performed according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. Briefly, neoplastic cells were considered positive when any cell membrane staining (partial or complete) was present, ignoring pure cytoplasmic immunoreaction. Staining on immune cells was also disregarded. Quantification of immunoreactive neoplastic cells was obtained by evaluating the ratio between stained carcinoma cells and all viable carcinoma cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Tissue Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, fresh, 3.5 µm thick, whole slide tissue sections were deparaffinized, treated using heat-induced antigen retrieval, and then incubated with primary antibodies (shown in Table 3).
Immunoreactions were detected using either a polymer-based ultraView or OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) or EnVision Detection System (Dako, Agilent Pathology Solutions, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Automated (BenchMark ULTRA, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) or semi-automated (AutoStainer, Lab Vision Corp., Fremont, CA, USA) staining instruments were used. Appropriate positive controls (pancreas, small intestine) were used for each antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

PD-L1 Expression Analysis in LPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
When available, formalin fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples collected from patients with well-differentiated and dedifferentiated LPS during a previous biopsy or surgery were reviewed by a designated pathologist and analyzed for PD-L1 expression. Immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 was performed with the Ventana SP263 assay (rabbit monoclonal primary anti–PD-L1 antibody, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ), Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved complementary diagnostics [11 (link)]), on the Benchmark XT staining systems and Ultra with the OptiView Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Whole tumor section was stained in each case to adequately reflect heterogeneity of expression. Positive PD-L1 expression was defined as staining in ≥ 1% of tumor cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!