The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Depc water

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

DEPC water is a laboratory reagent used to inactivate RNase enzymes, which can degrade RNA molecules. It is produced by adding diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) to purified water and then autoclaving to remove any residual DEPC. This process ensures the water is free of RNase contamination, making it suitable for use in sensitive RNA-based applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using depc water

1

RNA Isolation and Quantitative RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the first step mRNA from minimum 1 × 105 cells was isolated using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen). Prepared material was resuspended in 30 μL DEPC water (Ambion) and its purity was measured using spectrophotometer NanoDrop ND-1000. Every sample was treated with specific 1 U/mL DNase using DNA-free Kit (Ambion) and then reverse transcription reaction was made using the High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems) according to manufacturer's protocol.
Quantitative RT-PCR was analyzed using thermocycler 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with cDNA samples, SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Life Technologies), and specific primers shown in Table 2. For the final results, the expression was calculated by 2−ΔΔCt method with β-actin (ACTB) used as an internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA Isolation Using TRIzol Reagent

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated as previously described [36 (link)] by using TRIzol protocol (TRI Reagent, Sigma®, St. Louis, MO, USA, No. T9424), in which chloroform (Sigma® No. C2432) served as denaturing agent for the cells and isopropanol (Sigma® No. 650447) was the precipitating agent for RNA. The precipitate was diluted in DEPC water (Ambion®,Austin, TX, USA, No. AM9920), which also contains 1% SUPERaseIn RNase Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher®, Waltham, MA, USA, No. AM2694).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Isolation Using TRIzol Reagent

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following reagents were used: TRIzol (Invitrogen, 15596018), DEPC water (Ambion, AM9915), chloroform, isopropanol, and isoamyl alcohol (Xilong Chemistry). The following instruments were used: cryogenic centrifuge (Eppendorf), vortex oscillator (Qilinbeier), and TissueLyser II (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Chikungunya Virus by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All TRIzol-treated samples were stored at -70°C until use. Samples were thawed on ice and processed in accordance with manufacturer instructions using chloroform, 100% isopropyl alcohol, and 75% ethanol with the following modification: RNA was precipitated with 1 μl GlycoBlue (ThermoFisher). Precipitated RNA was re-suspended in 50 μl DEPC-treated water (Ambion). All samples were frozen and thawed on ice prior to running qRT-PCR.
Viral RNA was quantified by qRT-PCR in technical triplicates. A final reaction volume of 20 μl was used containing 10 μl serum or other sample RNA, 6.25 μl 4× TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 9 pmol reverse primer, 9 pmol forward primer, 10 μM probe, and 1.75 μl DEPC water (Ambion). Primers and probe (S4 Table) were adapted from Pastorino and colleagues [67 (link)] who reported a sensitivity of 27 RNA copies and 1.2×10−2 infectious doses per reaction. Amplification was performed in a StepOnePlus instrument (Applied Biosystems) under the following cycling conditions: 1 cycle at 50°C for 20 minutes, 1 cycle at 95°C for 2 minutes, 45 cycles at 95°C for 5 seconds, and 60°C for 1 minute. CHIKV genome copies were determined by using a standard curve derived from a 10-fold dilution series of CHIKV RNA from passage 3 stock virus quantified by spectrophotometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Vitro Transcription and RNA Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR fragments containing the T7 promoter were amplified using the oligonucleotides listed in Supplementary Table S3. In vitro transcription was performed at 37°C using the Megascript T7 transcription kit (Ambion) following the manufacturer’s recommendation. RNAs were loaded into a 6% polyacrylamide gel and visualized with UV light after Midori Green (Teknovas) staining. Bands of the appropriate size were cut and the RNA was extracted using 0.5 M ammonium acetate (pH 5.5) at 15°C for 2 h. Next, 1 volume of acid phenol (pH 4.5) was added and samples were incubated at 15°C overnight. After centrifugation for 5 min at 21 000 × g and 4°C, RNAs were purified using phenol–chloroform and precipitated by adding 3 volumes of 96% ethanol and 1/10 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.5). The mixture was incubated at −80°C for at least 1 h. Samples were then centrifuged for 30 min at 21 000 × g and 4°C. Pellets were washed with 70% ethanol, air dried and resuspended in DEPC water (Ambion). The RNA integrity was checked through agarose gel visualization and quantified by the Nanodrop system (Agilent Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptome analysis of European and Japanese eel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA of European eel samples collected at 3 dpi was extracted and sequenced as described by Bracamonte et al. (2019). Japanese eel samples collected at 3 dpi and 2 control and 2 treatment samples of the European eel collected at 23 dpi were stored in RNAlater. The remaining six samples of the European eel collected at 23 dpi and all Japanese eel samples collected at 23 dpi were shock‐frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Storage condition was included as a factor in the relevant model (see below). RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer's recommendations for fatty tissue with slight modifications. A TissueLyzer II (Eppendorf) was used to homogenize tissue in 850 μl TRIzol. After centrifugation, another 150 μl TRIzol and 200 μl chloroform were added to the supernatant. RNA was precipitated with 500 μl isopropanol and washed with 1 ml 75% ethanol. It was resuspended in 50 μl DEPC‐water (Life Technologies) and incubated on a heat block at 50°C for 2 min. Concentrations were measured with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Samples were diluted to 40 ng/μl in DEPC‐water, precipitated with 3 M sodium acetate and 100% ethanol. Library preparation and paired‐end sequencing (100 bp) were performed at Macrogen on an Illumina HiSeq4000. The number of raw reads per sample ranged from 14.6 to 30.8 M (Dryad Repository).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scoliotic Chondrocyte Transcriptome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly isolated scoliotic (n = 18 from 9 donors) and non‐scoliotic (n = 12 from 6 donors) chondrocytes were lysed with TRIzol (Life technologies). RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions and re‐suspended in DEPC water (Life technologies). 1 µg of RNA was reverse transcribed with the Reverse‐transcriptase kit (Life technologies). RT‐qPCR was performed on a QuantStudio 7 (Life Technologies) using PowerUp Sybr Green master mix (Life Technologies) and primers listed in Table 2. The results were analysed by the comparative CT method using ß‐actin as the reference gene. When compared to untreated or alarmin‐treated controls, the fold change was calculated using the 2−ddCT method and normalized to ß‐actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Reverse Transcription of RNA to cDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to transcribe RNA into cDNA, 0.5–1.0 μg RNA was added to 28 μl DEPC water (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). 2.3 μl oligo(dT)15 primers (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) and 2.3 μl random primers (Promega) were added to RNA and incubated for 10 min at 70 °C. The sample was placed on ice and 9.3 μl MMLV buffer (Promega), 2.3 μl dNTPs (Fermentas, Waltham, MA), and 2.3 μl reverse transcriptase (Promega) were added and well mixed. The sample was incubated for 90 min at 42 °C and then 10 min at 70 °C. The cDNA was stored at -20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Reverse Transcription of RNA to cDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to transcribe RNA into cDNA, 0.5–1.0 μg RNA was added to 28 μl DEPC water (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). 2.3 μl oligo(dT)15 primers (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) and 2.3 μl random primers (Promega) were added to RNA and incubated for 10 min at 70 °C. The sample was placed on ice and 9.3 μl MMLV buffer (Promega), 2.3 μl dNTPs (Fermentas, Waltham, MA), and 2.3 μl reverse transcriptase (Promega) were added and well mixed. The sample was incubated for 90 min at 42 °C and then 10 min at 70 °C. The cDNA was stored at -20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen - Thermofisher Waltham MA, USA) and then DNAse-treated using RNase-free DNase Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). Total RNA extracts were reverse-transcribed using the SuperScript III First-strand Synthesis SuperMix System kit (Invitrogen) to generate cDNA. In brief, 800 ng of total RNA were mixed with 10 μL of 2x RT Reaction Mix and 2 μL RT Enzyme Mix and made up to a final volume of 20 μL with DEPC water (Invitrogen). Quantitative Real-Time (qRT)-PCR amplification was performed using the KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Master Mix (2x) ABI Prism on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). All primers were designed using the web-based program Primer3Plus (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi) in combination with PrimerBlast for validation of target specificity (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/). The thermal cycler was programmed as follows: Enzyme activation at 95 °C for 3′ followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (95 °C for 3 s) and annealing (60 °C for 30s) and finally, dissociation curve analysis. Primer efficiency was determined using linear modelling for the amplification curves with the LinReg software version 2015.4 [27 (link)]. Relative quantification was calculated using the Pfaffl method [28 (link)]. Primers targeting FLI1, ASB2 and GAPDH are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!