The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whatman no 3 paper

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in Switzerland, United Kingdom

Whatman No. 3 paper is a cellulose-based filter paper used for general laboratory filtration purposes. It has a medium-fine pore size and is suitable for a variety of liquid filtration applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using whatman no 3 paper

1

Two-Dimensional Paper Electrophoresis of Labeled Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrophoresis was performed on Whatman No. 3 paper at 2.5-3.5 kV for 30-70 minutes in a buffer of pH 2.0 (formic acid/acetic acid/water, 1:4:45, v/v/v) or pH 6.5 (pyridine/acetic acid/ water, 33:1:300 v/v/v) (Fry, 2011) . Orange G (2 µl, 10 mM) was added to all samples as an internal marker. Neutral compounds move a small distance away from the origin owing to electro-endo-osmosis. DKG and related compounds were stained with AgNO3 (Fry, 2000) .
Electrophoretograms containing 14 C-labelled compounds autoradiographed on film (Kodak BioMax MR-1 film) for 7 days.
For 2-dimensional paper electrophoresis, a single sample, along with external markers, was loaded onto Whatman No. 3 paper and subjected to electrophoresis as described above. The paper was then dried before the lane of interest was cut out. This lane was then sewn onto the origin of a new sheet of Whatman No. 3 paper, so that the compounds in the sample lane were lined up along the new origin. Further markers (internal marker Orange G, and external marker DKG products) were added. This new paper was then subjected to electrophoresis at either pH 2.0 or pH 6.5 as described previously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Olive Mill Wastewater Extraction Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The olive mill wastewater (OMW) employed in this work was offered by the Company Vinciprova Srl of San Vincenzo la Costa (CS) Italy during the 2019 oil season. This waste is from Olea Europea Roggianella cv; it was harvested in October and immediately processed using the traditional method Enorossi 150 working at 150 kg of olives. Several samples of 50 mL each were stored at −50 °C before the analysis. OMW (200 mL) has been filtered thought Whatman paper No. 3 and centrifugated (3 times) for 10 min at 10,000 rpm. The liquid phase was freeze-dried and furnished as a brown dry solid (ELAVF) that was stored at +4 °C until using. The extracts were obtained via two methods: maceration, (0.5 g of ELAFV) employing ethanol, acetone, n-hexane, and dichloromethane as solvents (40 mL), and Soxhlet, (1 g of ELAVF) at reflux for 5 h, employing ethanol, acetone, dichloromethane, and ethanol/water (90:10) as solvents (100 mL). After the extraction, all the extracts (ELAVF) were filtered on Whatman paper No. 3, freeze dried and stored at +4 °C until the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Extraction and Characterization of Ficus asperifolia Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh fruits of F. asperifolia were collected in January 2014 at around 9 AM local time from trees in Batcham, Cameroon. Botanical identification was performed in the Cameroon National Herbarium (HNC) where a voucher No 338/15240/HNC has been deposited. The fruits were dried in the shade for 14 days and ground into powder. Two types of extracts were used in the study. In order to obtain an aqueous extract similar to the traditional preparation, 300 g of F. asperifolia were soaked in boiled distilled water (5.4 L). The mixture was allowed to cool at room temperature for 15 min and then filtered using Whatman paper No 3 and oven-dried to give 45.70 g of aqueous extract (yield of extraction, 15.23%; w/w based on the dried starting weight). To obtain the methanolic extract, 1 kg of F. asperifolia powder was soaked in 8 L of methanol (95%) for 24 h. The extract was filtered using Whatman paper No 3 and the filtrate was evaporated (78 °C) to dryness using a rotary evaporator; 25.64 g of dried methanolic extract were obtained giving an extraction yield of 2.56% (w/w based on the dried starting weight). For bioactivity investigations, the aqueous and methanolic extracts were dissolved in distilled water and 5% Tween 80 respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Characterization of Fungal Bioactives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fungal specimens were dried and then crushed into powder form and sequentially extracted into four extracts as previously described [11 (link),12 (link)]. For large-scale extraction, powdered O. tomentosa CL312 (87 g) was first extracted with 80% ethanol for 3 h at 65 °C. The solution, filtered through Whatman paper No. 3, was then referred to as E1, whereas the residue was subjected to the second step: 50% methanol extraction for 3 h at 65 °C. This filtrate, designated as E2, was retained while the residue was subjected to the third step: water extraction for 6 h at 65 °C. The filtrate from the water extraction step was referred to as E3. Finally, this residue was subjected to the final step: 5% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) extraction at 65 °C for 6 h. The filtered solution from this step was referred to as E4. Both E1 and E2 liquid extracts were concentrated using a rotary evaporator before being subjected to lyophilization to yield solid extracts of 13.2 g (15.2%) and 5.3 g (6.1%), respectively. All lyophilized extracts were reconstituted in water at 20 mg/mL and filter-sterilized using a 0.2 μm filter (Sarstedt, Quebec), before they were assessed for antiproliferative and immunomodulatory activities as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibacterial Activity of Synthesized Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro antibacterial activity of the synthesized compounds was investigated by using the disc diffusion technique. Bacteria samples from one over-night grown colony were suspended in a test tube containing physiological water. The turbidity (expressed as optical density OD) of the microorganism suspensions was measured with an optical spectrophotometer (wavelength = 625 nm) and adjusted to 0.6 to 0.8. A sterilized cotton swab was immersed in the resulting suspension, and a lawn of bacteria was applied onto the surface of the plates containing Tryptic Soy Agar for bacteria and Sabouraud dextrose agar for the fungal sample. Then, sterile filter paper disks (diameter 6 mm, Whatman paper no3) were first impregnated with 30 μl of each dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) extract (6 mg/ml). The side containing the particles was facing downwards to ensure direct interaction with the agar and microorganisms. The bacterial plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and the fungal plates were incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. Finally, the diameter of the growth inhibition zones was measured using a zone inhibition reader (Fisher Lilly Antibiotic Zone Reader). Disks with 30 μl of distilled water were used as negative controls, and antibiotic discs were used as positive controls such as Nystatine (10 mg/ml), Gectapen (40 mg/ml), Azimycine (30 mg/ml). Each experiment was carried out twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ethanolic Extraction of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred grams of powder was measured using an electric balance (SF-400) and introduced into 1 L of 95% ethanol. The concentration is 10% g/ml. The mixture was homogenised for 72 h (every 4 hours, the extract was stirred) and filtered using Whatman paper no. 3. The resulting filtrate was dried in an oven at 45°C until the dry extract was obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Adsorption Kinetics of Aflatoxin B1 by Porous Silica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro digestion was conducted as suggested by
Tso et al.35 (link) with some modifications. 1
mL of AFB1 solution (3.5 μg/mL) was added to 21 mL of AGJ; 3.5
mg of each porous silica was then added. The mixture was incubated
in a shaking water bath at 40 °C at 150 rpm for 0, 1, 3, and
5 h. After 5 h, 20 mL of AIJ was added to the mixture; incubation
continued in the same shaking water bath at 40 °C at 150 rpm
for 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 h. After incubation, the mixture was collected
and filtered using Whatman paper No. 3. The clean-up and HPLC of the
extract were carried out according to the methods of Sungsinchai et
al.40 (link)Adsorption kinetic equations
were used to analyze the adsorption kinetic data.41 (link) The adsorption capability is given by eq 2. where Co is the
initial concentration of AFB1 (μg/mL) and Ct is the concentration of AFB1 at the final stage of in
vitro digestion (μg/mL).
The pseudo-first-order equation
is given in eq 3. where qe is the
concentration of AFB1 adsorbed at equilibrium (mg/g), qt is the concentration adsorbed at time t (mg/g), and ka is the first-order rate
constant (h–1). The values of R2, ka, and qe were calculated using a plot of ln (qeqt) versus time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extraction of B. micrantha Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder B. micrantha (100 grams) using an electrical balance (SF-400) was weighed into a 2-litre container, with an addition of 95% ethanol (one litre) followed by agitation for five minutes and maceration for 72 hours. Whatman paper no. 3 was used to filter the homogenate with the resulting filtrate evaporated at 45°C in an oven [15 ]. The aqueous extract was prepared by infusion in distilled water at 100°C for three hours, followed by filtration to obtain the filtrate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Extraction and Fractionation of Fungal Bioactives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fungal specimens were dried and then crushed into powder, then sequentially processed into four extracts as previously described [2 (link),3 (link)]. For large extraction, 350 g of powdered specimen was processed with 3.5 L of 80% ethanol for 3 h at 65 °C. The solution, referred to as 1A, was filtered through Whatman paper No. 3. The residue was subjected to a second step of 50% methanol extraction for 3 h at 65 °C. This filtrate was designated as 1B. The residue was subjected to a third step which involved water extraction for 6 h at 65 °C. The filtrate from the water extraction was referred to as 1C. The residue was subjected to the final step of 5% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) extraction at 65 °C for 6 h. The filtered solution from this step was referred to as 1D. All extracts were subjected to roto-evaporation followed by lyophilization. All lyophilized extracts were reconstituted in water at 20 mg/mL and were filter-sterilized using a 0.2 μm filter (Sarstedt, Quebec) before they were assessed for immunomodulatory and antiproliferative activity as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extraction of Bridelia atroviridis Bark

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Bridelia atroviridis barks were harvested at Mbalmayo in December 2018. The plant was authenticated by Mr. Ngansop Eric, a botanist at the National Herbarium, Yaoundé (Cameroon), in comparison with the specimen voucher N35241/HNC Cam. The barks were air-dried in the shade and pulverized into powder. A kilogram of powder from B. atroviridis was soaked in 5 L of hydroethanolic solvent mixture (30% water and 70% ethanol; v/v) for 72 hours with regular agitation. Then, the mixture was filtered with Whatman paper No. 3, and the filtrate was evaporated to dryness using a rotatory evaporator (Buchi Rota vapor, Switzerland) at a temperature of 45°C. The residual water was removed by ventilation under a hood (Burdinola ST 1800) giving a powdered crude extract.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Whatman no 3 paper »