The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

38 protocols using coelenterazine

1

Measuring Cytosolic Calcium Dynamics in Plant Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Excised 1‐cm long root tips (with or without the first apical millimetre excised) of 10‐day old seedlings were incubated overnight, in darkness at room temperature in 100 µl half MS containing 10 µM coelenterazine (NanoLight Technology, Pinetop AZ, USA), pH 5.6. with MES/Tris (Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany). Half MS medium had the same nutrient status (i.e. full Pi or zero Pi) as the plants were grown on. One root tip (1‐cm long with or without the first apical millimetre excised) was placed per well (containing 100 µl of the appropriate full Pi or zero Pi half MS) in a white 96‐well plate (Greiner Bio‐One, Kremsmuenster, Austria). Luminescence was recorded every second for 200 s (FLUOstar OPTIMA plate reader, BMG Labtech, Aylsebury, UK). After 35 s, 100 µl of control (full Pi or zero Pi half MS) or test solution (plus 1 mM ATP; Melford, Ipswich, UK) were added. Discharge solution (final concentration: 10% (v/v) ethanol, 1 M CaCl2) was injected after 120 s. [Ca2+]cyt and changes in [Ca2+]cyt were estimated according to Matthus et al. (2019a (link)), in which peak maxima were detected in set timeframes. Total [Ca2+]cyt mobilized was estimated as ‘Area Under the Curve’ (AUCLenzoni et al. 2018 (link); Matthus et al. 2019a (link)). A summary schematic is shown in Fig. 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Luminescence Monitoring of ATP Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, 5-day-old seedlings were individually transferred to the wells of a 96-well plate with 50 μl of reconstitution buffer containing 10 μM coelenterazine (Nanolight Technology, Pinetop, AZ), 2 mM MES buffer (pH 5.7), and 10 mM CaCl2 and incubated in the dark at room temperature overnight. Fifty microliters of treatment solution (concentration was double strength to give a set final concentration of 25 mM MES and 100 μM ATP (Sigma, A2383) was added to each well, and the luminescence was monitored using a CCD camera (Photek 216; Photek, Ltd.)63 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bioluminescent Neuronal Imaging Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The luciferin, coelenterazine (CTZ), was purchased from Nanolight Technology (Pinetop, AZ). For in vitro experiments coelenterazine free base, the natural form of CTZ (Nanolight cat. no. 303), was dissolved in NanoFuel (Nanolight cat. no. 399) or acidified ethanol (0.06 N HCl). Reconstituted CTZ was pre-diluted 1:500 in NB-Plain and added to neuron cultures for a final concentration of 100 μM for recordings. For in vivo experiments, water soluble CTZ (Nanolight cat. no. 3031) was used, and water-soluble buffer only, without CTZ (Nanolight cat. no. 3031C), was used as a vehicle control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ELISA-based Quantification of Anti-MARV sdAb Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ELISA plates were coated overnight at 4 °C with 100 µL 1 µg mL−1 neutravidin in PBS. Plates were washed three times with PBS and then blocked by filling to brimming with Bb for 1 h. A volume of 100 µL 100 nM anti-MARV sdAb A, B or C as BAP fusion proteins purified from pecan126 as described above was applied to duplicate wells in Bb for 1 h. Wells were washed to brimming three times with PBST and two times with PBS. Bb was added to the well to brimming for 1 h to further block the sdAb and then dilutions of nluc, nluc–MARV–NP600 or nluc–MLAV–NP604 in MPBS were added to duplicate wells for 1 h. Following washing, wells were developed with injection of coelenterazine (NanoLight™ Technology, Pinetop, AZ, USA) in lucky buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) and emissions collected using a luminometer (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with a 2 s integration. The experiment was repeated two more times and curves are the plots of three mean RLU of nluc–NP minus the corresponding mean of the nluc alone with error bars representing +/− SD. The EC50y value was calculated for curves that plateaued using the equation [RLUmin + (RLUmax − RLUmin)/2]. The corresponding x values were calculated using one observed point greater and one less than the y EC50 using the trend function in Excel and the three values averaged and presented +/− SD nM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bioluminescent Calcium Signaling Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ΔluxCDABEG strain (parent) and its ΔcasA derivative carrying pAT103 were grown overnight at 28°C in LBS with Cm. The overnight cultures were subcultured 1:100, grown until mid-log phase, and collected and centrifuged. Samples were washed two times and resuspended in PBS, and a limiting amount of coelenterazine (Nanolight Technology) was added to a final concentration of 5 μM. The samples were vortexed and incubated in the dark for 1 h and washed in PBS, and the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was measured. Samples were normalized to an OD of 0.4 in a white 96-well plate and incubated in the dark for 10 min. The baseline luminescence of the samples was measured with a delay of 1 s for 5.9 min in a luminometer (Veritas microplate luminometer; Turner Biosystems). Calcium was added to a final concentration of 40 mM, and the luciferase activity was measured with a delay of 1 s for approximately 17 min 40 s. The limiting amount of coelenterazine is responsible for the temporal appearance of light production. This assay was performed at least three separate times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

BRET Assay for Ligand-Receptor Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty-four hours after transfection, the CHO cells were washed in PBS and afterwards resuspended in PBS + 1% glucose. Eighty µl of 4 × 106 cells/ml were seeded in a 96-well plate (~100,000 cells/well). Five µM coelenterazine (NanoLight Technology, Pinetop, AZ, United States) was added to the cells. After 10 min, 5 µl of varying ligand concentrations was added to each well. After 15 min coelenterazine and 1 µM forskolin (Sigma-Aldrich) were added. The plates were kept in the dark all the time. The emission signals from Renilla luciferase (RLuc) and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) were measured with a 2104 EnVision Multilabel plate reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, United States). The BRET signal is the ratio of the detected YFP (acceptor emission) at 525 nm divided by the RLuc at 475 nm (donor emission) [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cultivation and Characterization of Diverse Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
K562 (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia), Raji (Burkitt’s lymphoma), HEL 92.1.7 (Erythroleukemia) and NK92MI cell lines were obtained from ATCC and maintained as per the instructions provided. Nalm6 (Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia), BC-1 (Primary effusion lymphoma), and KG-1 (Acute myelogenous leukemia) cell lines were kindly provided by Drs. Markus Muschen, Jae Jung, and Alan Epstein, respectively. 293FT cells were obtained from Invitrogen (ThermoFisher Scientific) and cultured as recommended. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by Ficoll gradient method from platelet depleted donor cells obtained from a Blood Bank. PBMCs were subsequently used to isolate T cells using CD3 magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotech) following the manufacturer’s instructions. T cells were cultured in XVIVO-15 (Lonza) medium supplemented with 100 IU/ml recombinant human IL2 and 30 ng/ml soluble antibodies to human CD3 and CD28. All the cells were cultured at 37 °C, in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. Blinatumomab was obtained from Amgen, Rituximab was obtained from Genentech. Digitonin, and Polybrene were from Sigma. Coelenterazine was purchased from Nanolight technology. Calcein AM fluorescent dye was obtained from BD biosciences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Non-Invasive Luminescence Imaging in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
eGFP expression was visualized using a microscope with a fluorescent light source (Leica MZ10F). fluc expression was quantified by non-invasive bioluminescence imaging (IVIS Spectrum, Perkin Elmer) at the molecular imaging for Small Animals Center (moSAIC) at KU Leuven. Mice were sedated with isoflurane inhalation and subcutaneously injected with 126 mg/kg D-luciferin substrate (Promega) at 15 mg/ml in sterile D-PBS (14190144, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Total radiance (p/s, photons per second) was collected at fluc signal plateau. Gluc in plasma was analyzed using a FLUOstar Omega Microplate Reader (BMG Labtech) in black 96-well plates. Per well, 100 µl of 100 µM coelenterazine (Nanolight Technology, Pinetop, AZ) was added to 5 µl plasma via automated injection. Data was analyzed with MARS Software (BMG Labtech). Counts (RLU, relative light unit) 1 sec after injection of the substrate were used for analyses. Readout was corrected for the pretreatment plasma count.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal Imaging of Tumor Progression and Cell Fate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical imaging was performed using IVIS 200 Imaging System (Xenogen Corporation, Hopkinton, MA). BLI of the fate of transplanted cells in living mice was done as described previously [17 (link)]. Imaging of Fluc and Rluc expression was used for assessing tumor development and hUC-MSC-TF cells' fate respectively. d-Luciferin (150 mg/kg; Biosynth International, Naperville, IL) was intraperitoneally injected into mice for evaluating Fluc expression, and each mouse was imaged for 1 s to 3 min. Coelenterazine (2.5 mg/kg; NanoLight Technology, Pinetop, AZ) was intravenously into mice for assessing Rluc expression. After injection of Coelenterazine, mice were imaged for 2 min, immediately.
To monitor tumor angiogenesis and apoptosis status after hUC-MSC-TF cells administration, NIR fluorescence imaging of integrin αvβ3 and annexin V was carried out with reagents IntegriSense™ 750 and Annexin-Vivo™ 750 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). For IntegriSense™ 750 imaging, fluorescence signal was measured at excitation 755 nm (emission 775 nm) 24 h post-injection; similarly, fluorescence signal was obtained 2 h after Annexin-Vivo™ 750 imaging agent administration at excitation 755 nm (emission 772 nm) following the manufactures' recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optimized Chemical Reagent Procurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coelenterazine was purchased from Nanolight Technology, dissolved in ethanol as 5 mg/mL stock. All of the animal cell culture media, FBS, the antibiotics streptomycin and penicillin (P/S), 4% to 12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels were purchased from Invitrogen. EnduRen Live Cell Substrate was purchased from Promega. 17-(Dimethylaminoethylamino)-17-demethoxy-geldanamycin (17-DMAG) and puromycin hydrochloride (100 mg/mL) were purchased from Invivogen. The purine-scaffold Hsp90i PU-H71 was synthesized and dissolved previously reported (26 -28 (link)). Valproic acid sodium salt (VPA) was dissolved in distilled water as 2 mol/L stock. APHA compound 8 and trichostatin A were dissolved in DMSO (1 mg/mL). Tubacin, WT161, and MS-275 were synthesized at Broad Institute as previously described (3 (link), 29 (link), 30 (link)) and dissolved in DMSO as 20 mmol/L stock. All chemical reagents and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Acros, Novabiochem. The carrier controls that were used matched that of the highest concentration used for dilution of the compounds (100% PBS, 0.3% DMSO, and 90% β-cyclodextran: 10% DMSO for 1A12, 0.01% of PBS for PU-H71; 0.1% for 17-DMAG; 0.1% for WT161; 0.1% for Tubacin; 0.1% for APHA8; 0.1% MS275) to account for their biologic effects.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!