The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Signa hdx 3.0t

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The Signa HDx 3.0T is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system developed by GE Healthcare. It operates at a field strength of 3.0 Tesla, providing high-resolution imaging capabilities. The system is designed to enable efficient and versatile imaging across a range of clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

25 protocols using signa hdx 3.0t

1

Characterization of SPPTC Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and the morphology of SPPTC were characterized through transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2010, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 200 kV. One drop of the sample solution (0.1 mg/mL) was deposited on a carbon-coated copper grid (200 meshes) and allowed to air dry. The excess solution was removed with filter paper. The hydrodynamic diameter and the size distribution of SPPTC were measured through dynamic light scattering (DLS, Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK) at room temperature.
Magnetic properties were studied using vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, ADE Model 4 HF VSM, ADE, Lowell, MA, USA) under the field of up to 15 kOe at room temperature. To determine the relaxivity, the nanoprobe was diluted in distilled water at an iron concentration range of 0 to 25 μg/mL. The samples were transferred to a 96-well plate, and T2 relaxation time was determined using a whole-body MR scanner (Signa HDx 3.0 T, GE, New York, NY, USA). The fluorescence properties were determined with IVIS® Lumina XR Imaging System (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

MRI Evaluation of Spinal Cord Involvement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Evaluations of the spinal cord involvement in these patients were based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, because the brain and optic nerve imaging data were incomplete. The spinal cord MRI scans were performed during the acute phase of the disease using a nuclear magnetic resonance scanner (SignaHDX-3.0 T, General Electric, Fairfield, CT, USA; or GYROSCAN-1.5 T, Philips, Amsterdam, Holland). The MRI scanning data were obtained before PLEX, and included the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. All images were sagittal. The radiographical features of interest were the LETM (⩾3 vertebral segments), and the involved spinal cord segments and their location. The area postrema lesion on the cervical MRI was counted as one spinal cord segment when the cervical lesion extended to the area postrema.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Functional MRI Acquisition Protocol for Brain Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Signa HDX 3.0T (GE Healthcare, USA) nuclear magnetic resonance instrument was used to collect fMRI data. Volunteers were in the supine position with their head position fixed bilaterally using foam pads, eyes closed using an eye mask, and earplugs to protect hearing. Volunteers were instructed to relax, slow their breathing, and refrain from falling asleep during the scanning procedure. The fMRI scanning procedure began with a 3PL localizer scan, followed by an assessment calibration, and a subsequent blood signal scan. A total of 128 volumes were acquired using an echo-planar imaging sequence (30 axial slices, repetition time = 3,000 ms, echo time = 40 ms, flip angle = 90°, matrix = 128 × 128, in-plane resolution of 1.875 mm × 1.875 mm, thickness/gap = 5/0 mm). Subsequently, 3D T1-weighted anatomical images were acquired (248 sagittal slices, repetition time = 5.5 s, echo time =1.7 ms, matrix = 256 × 256, voxel size 1 mm × 1 mm × 1.2 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pancreatic Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MR scans were performed by using a 3.0-T or 1.5-T unit (Signa HDx 3.0-T; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, United States, or Achieva 1.5-T; Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Conventional axial, sagittal, and coronal T1-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging sequence (without and with gadolinium), fast spin-echo T2-weighted fat-suppressed sequence (echo time/repetition time [TE/TR]: 4,000–8,000/80–90 ms). MRCP was performed using heavily T2-weighted fast acquisition spin echo sequence (TR/TE: 2,400–6,000/500–800 ms). Contrast enhanced imaging was also performed after the intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium (2.5 ml/s).
The following imaging parameters were collected: tumor location (head–neck or body–tail), tumor size, MPD diameter, and the presence of enhanced MN with a size ≥5 mm. The MPD diameter was measured at the point of the maximally dilated pancreatic duct (16 (link)). Enhanced MN was considered if there were any enhancing solid papillary protuberances within the lesions (16 (link)). PA was considered if the ratio between the MPD diameter and the width of the pancreas parenchyma is larger than 0.5 (27 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MRI Imaging of Mn-IONPs Contrast Agents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro MR imaging was carried out using a clinical 3.0 T MRI scanner (GE, Signa HDx 3.0T, USA) with a head coil. The Mn-IONPs@PEG and Mn-IONPs-TMAH (shown in SI) solutions with [Fe+Mn] concentrations from 0 to 0.5 mM were imaged using the following parameters: fast spin echo sequence (FSE) T1WI: repetition time (TR) = 240 ms, echo time (TE) = 7.5 ms, field of view (FOV) = 160×160 mm2, matrix = 320×192, slice thickness/spacing =2.0 mm/0.1 mm, number of excitations (NEX) = 4; T1 mapping: TE = 9 ms, TR = 150, 300, 600, 900, 1200 ms, FOV = 160×160 mm2, matrix = 256×256, slice thickness/spacing = 2.0 mm/0.1 mm, NEX = 1; FSE T2WI: TR = 2000 ms, TE = 46.5 ms, FOV = 160×128 mm2, matrix = 192×160, slice thickness/spacing = 2.0 mm/0.1 mm, NEX = 4; T2 mapping: TR = 1500 ms, TE = 7.8, 15.6, 23.5, 31.3, 39.1, 46.9, 54.8, 62.6 ms, FOV = 160×128 mm2, matrix = 160×128, slice thickness/spacing = 2.0 mm/0.4 mm, and NEX = 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal neuroimaging protocol for brain analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All scans were conducted using the same magnetic resonance scanner (SignaHDx 3.0T, GE Healthcare; Milwaukee, WI, USA).
The high-resolution T1 weighted brain volume was collected with a 3D MRI sequence [repetition time (TR) = 8.1 ms; echo time (TE) = 3.1 ms; voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3; flip angle = 13°; 176 slices].
Resting-state fMRI data was obtained with a single-shot gradient echo-planar imaging sequence (TR = 2 s; TE = 30 ms; matrix size = 64 × 64; field of view (FOV) = 240 × 240 mm2; voxel size = 3.75 × 3.75 × 4.0 mm3; 40 slices; 180 volumes; flip angle = 90°). All subjects were required to close their eyes and remain still without falling asleep.
DTI data was obtained using an echo planar imaging sequence [TR = 1 s; TE = 64 ms; matrix size = 128 × 128; field of view = 256 × 256 mm2; voxel size = 2.0 × 2.0 × 3.0 mm3; flip angle = 90°; b0 = 0 (3 repeated acquisitions), b = 1000 s/mm2, 55 directions; slice thickness = 3 mm, 45 slices].
During the scanning process, we took measures, such as a foam pad and ear plugs for each participant, to reduce head motion and noise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Diffusion Tensor Imaging Protocol for Neuroimaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants were scanned using a GE Signa HDX 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging scanner with a standard 12-channel head coil at The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University. Head motion was minimized with foam padding. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired using a spin-echo planar imaging sequence parallel to the anterior-posterior commissure plane with the following parameters: TR = 17000 ms, TE = 85.4 ms, image matrix = 120 × 120, field of view = 240 × 240 mm2, 65 contiguous slices of 2 mm without gap, 25 noncollinear directions, and one no diffusion-weighting baseline image.
Image preprocessing was performed using PANDA (http://www.nitrc.org/projects/panda), a fully automated program for processing of brain diffusion images. After motion and eddy current correction were performed, individual FA images of native space were registered to the FA template in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space, followed by resampling the images to a customized spatial resolution 1 × 1 × 1 mm with subsequent warping transformations. Lastly, the FA images were smoothed by a 6 mm Gaussian kernel to reduce noise and misalignment. The resulting images were then used in statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

3T MRE Phantom Stiffness Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI was performed using a Signa HDx 3.0 T (GE Healthcare), with an eight channel head coil and pneumatic driver. MR room temperature was similarly maintained at 20°C. A spin-echo echo planar imaging MRE sequence was used. Imaging parameters were as follows: TR=448 ms, TE=47.2 ms, field-of-view=19.2×19.2 cm2, voxel size=3.0×3.0×3.0 mm3, imaging matrix=64×64, vibration and motion-sensitising gradient (MSG) frequency=125 Hz, MSG cycle=2, phase offset=4 and readout direction=R-L. MRE was carried out once for each phantom. The storage modulus was calculated using the three-dimensional integral-type reconstruction formula (ITRF)21 and spatiotemporal directional filtering.22 (link) Support size of the test function using ITRF was 3, 5 or 7, which was set to half of the propagation wave length.
Although the stiffness in MRE is usually reported as a complex shear modulus in kilopascals, we transformed the storage map to an SWS map using equation (5) for comparison between pSWE, MRE and a rheometer, with stiffness reported in metres per second. ROI size was set to 6×6 mm2, approximating the ROI size of VTQ, containing four pixels each. ROI was set at 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 cm depth from the passive pneumatic driver on the velocity map (figure 1). Mean and SD in each ROI were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Iron Concentration Quantification by MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In a typical measurement, the sample was dissolved in deionized water and diluted at an iron concentration range of 0–20 μg/mL. The samples were transferred to a 96-well plate, and T2 relaxation time was determined by using a whole-body magnetic resonance (MR) scanner (SignaHDx 3.0T; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluation of a Novel 3T MRI Coil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MR images were acquired with a 3.0-T scanner (Signa HDx 3.0T; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). RF transmission was performed using the body coil of the scanner. We used a circular, 3-cm diameter, receive-only surface coil (Takashima Seisakusho, Tokyo, Japan). The coil was encased (length, width, height: 126 × 50 × 15 mm), and a 21-mm aperture was created at the top and bottom of the case. The coil was the same type as that developed previously;7 however, it was not the same one as was used in a preclinical research, since we purchased another coil from Takashima Seisakusho for this clinical research. We made sure that we were able to safely preform MR scans using this coil based on the following results: the coil passed a standard voltage proof test and a standard test on RF-induced heating according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F2182-11a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!