The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sensation cardiac

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in United States, Germany

The Sensation Cardiac is a lab equipment product designed for medical and clinical applications. It is used to measure and analyze cardiac activity and associated physiological parameters. The core function of the Sensation Cardiac is to provide accurate and reliable data for cardiac assessment and monitoring purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

4 protocols using sensation cardiac

1

3D Planning for Distal Humerus Fractures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (approved No. 14-21, T2022-0041). The present study was registered as NCT04349319 at ClinicalTrials.gov. This was a prospective case series (level of evidence II). Twenty-three elbows of 23 distal humerus fracture patients who underwent osteosynthesis with 3D preoperative planning (14 females, 9 males, mean age 61.3 years, age range 21–87) were evaluated. Written consent was obtained from all study participants. Patients were excluded if they had a previous history of traumatic arm injuries. All patients had CT images of the injured elbow taken before and 1 month after surgery. According to preoperative X-ray (posterior-anterior and lateral view) and CT scans, fractures were classified using the AO classification system. CT images were taken with tube settings of 120 kV and 100 mAS, a section thickness of 0.8 mm, and a pixel size of 0.3 × 0.3 mm (Sensation Cardiac, Siemens). Images were taken in a range of approximately 20 cm centered on the elbow joint.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Distal Radius Fracture Management with 3D Planning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board. This was a case control study (level of evidence III). This study was registered as NCT02909647 at ClinicalTrials.gov. This study included the patients who underwent osteosynthesis with volar locking plate using 3D preoperative planning during the period from October 2015 to December 2019. The follow-up period was 6 months. Sixty-three wrists of 63 distal radius fracture patients (46 females, 17 males, mean age 65.1 years, age range 18-91) were evaluated. Written consent was obtained from all study participants. Patients under the age of 18, patients with bilateral distal radius fractures, and/or patients with a history of traumatic arm injury were excluded. We also excluded the patients who underwent osteosynthesis without using volar locking plate. All patients had CT images of the injured wrist taken before and 1 month after surgery. According to the preoperative X-ray (posterior-anterior and lateral view) and CT scans, fractures were classified using the AO classification system. CT images were taken with a tube setting of 120kV and 100mAS, a section thickness of 0.8 mm and a pixel size of 0.3×0.3 mm (Sensation Cardiac, Siemens). The CT images were taken from the metacarpal bone level to approximately 13 cm of the proximal forearm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Distal Radius Fracture Osteosynthesis with Volar Locking Plate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study protocol was approved by our Institutional Review Board. The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. This was a retrospective case control study (level of evidence III). Fifty-two wrists of 52 distal radius fracture patients who underwent osteosynthesis (38 females, 14 males, mean age 63.3 years, age range 18–91) were evaluated. All patients were treated with volar locking plates. Patients were excluded if they reported a previous history of traumatic arm injuries. For the assessment of CT images, written consent was obtained from all study participants. The patients lay down with their arms elevated over their heads and their wrists and forearms in neutral positions. CT images were taken before surgery and one month after the surgery with tube settings of 120 kV and 100 mAS and a section thickness of 0.8 mm and a pixel size of 0.3 × 0.3 mm (Sensation Cardiac, SIEMENS, Malvern, PA, USA). According to preoperative X-rays (posterior-anterior and lateral view) and CT scans, fractures were classified using the AO classification system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Normative Wrist CT Imaging Database

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol of this retrospective case control study (level of evidence III) was approved by the Institutional Review Board. The radiographic database was accessed to identify cases that underwent a CT scan of the normal wrist. Using an image database, we evaluated CT images of unaffected wrists taken for comparison with the affected side. The absence of a previous history and complaints in the unaffected wrist was confirmed in an interview and with medical records. CT images of 100 wrists from 50 males and 50 females who matched the age distribution (19–95 years old, mean: 56.1 years old for males; 18–93 years old, mean: 58.8 years old for females) were evaluated. Patients were excluded if they had a previous history of traumatic arm injuries or were younger than 18 years. CT imaging conditions were as follows: a tube setting of 120 kV and 100 mAS; a section thickness of 1–1.5 mm; and a pixel size of 0.3 × 0.3 mm (Sensation Cardiac, Siemens, Berlin, Germany). CT images were taken from the metacarpal bone level to approximately 13 cm proximal to the radius joint surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!