The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using fastscan afm

1

AFM Imaging of PIC-DNA on Mica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM imaging was performed on a fast-scan AFM by JPK Instruments (Germany) under AC fast imaging mode (liquid) with USC-F0.3-k0.3 AFM tips from NanoWorld (Neuchâtel, Switzerland). On a segment of freshly cleaved mica (0.9 cm diameter; Ted Pella Inc.) mounted to a magnetic puck, 15 μl of PIC-DNA solution was deposited immediately before measurement. A 25 μl droplet of imaging buffer was deposited on the AFM tip, then the AFM tip mount was lowered into the sample buffer to create a liquid ‘chamber’ for imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

AFM Imaging of PIC-DNA on Mica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM imaging was performed on a fast-scan AFM by JPK Instruments (Germany) under AC fast imaging mode (liquid) with USC-F0.3-k0.3 AFM tips from NanoWorld (Neuchâtel, Switzerland). On a segment of freshly cleaved mica (0.9 cm diameter; Ted Pella Inc.) mounted to a magnetic puck, 15 μl of PIC-DNA solution was deposited immediately before measurement. A 25 μl droplet of imaging buffer was deposited on the AFM tip, then the AFM tip mount was lowered into the sample buffer to create a liquid ‘chamber’ for imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Plasma-Induced Surface Morphology Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to inspect changes in the surface morphology of samples before and after plasma treatment. The micrographs were obtained from TM-3000 SEM (Hitachi, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and a FastScan AFM (Bruker Nano Surface, USA) with a Scanasyst-Air probe in light tapping, scanning, and imaging mode. The contact force was 0.4 cN/m and the resonance frequency was 70 kHz. Finally, the surface topography of samples with an area of 4 μm × 4 μm were obtained. The root mean square roughness (Rq), average roughness (Ra), and the maximum peak valley roughness (Rmax) were used as indexes to analyze the microstructure of the sample surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The height and alignment of the VACNTs were characterized using scanning electron microscopes (SEM, FEI Nova 450 and Hitachi SU 8200). TEM was used to obtain CNT diameter statistics (Philips CM12). Catalyst particle density was probed with a Bruker Fastscan AFM. The as-grown CNT quality and the phase information of the as-deposited TiO2 layer were determined by use of a Renishaw InVia Raman spectroscope (785 nm excitation) and NTMDT NTEGRA Raman spectroscope (571 nm excitation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

AFM and Raman Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM measurements were performed on a Bruker FastScan AFM, in the PeakForce31 feedback mode, which allows the extraction and analysis of individual force curves for each pixel at regular scanning speeds (0.5–4 Hz). Typically, fast and large area scans are used to determine the period, whereas slower and smaller area scans are used to calculate the ratio δ/L. Raman spectroscopy measurements were taken with the Witec confocal Raman spectrometer with a wavelength of 514 nm and 1 mW power.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Conformational Analysis of Aβ42 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Aâ42 protein conformation variances were carried out in a JASCO J-810 automatic recording spectropolarimeter (Jasco Inc., Tokyo, Japan) controlled by the Jasco software. Briefly, Aâ42 (25 ìM) in the absence and presence of doliroside A (125 ìM) were incubated at 37°C for assigned periods. After co-incubation, the samples were centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 15 min, and the supernatant was injected into a 1-mm path length quartz cuvette. A background CD spectrum of buffer solution was subtracted from the sample spectrum for baseline correction. Spectra were recorded under the conditions: a resolution of 0.5 nm, scanning rate of 100 nm/min, response time of 1 s, bandwidth of 2 nm, room temperature and the wavelength ranges from 250 to 190 nm.Morphology detection by atomic force microscope (AFM).
10 μL samples were pipetted onto freshly cleaved mica plate (1 cm × 1 cm) fixed onto a glass slide and incubated at room temperature for 3 min. The remaining saltsand loose deposits in the suspension were triplicate rinsed with ultrapure water (50 μL, Millipore) and then air-dried for a whole night (12 h). AFM images were obtained on a dimension FastScan AFM (Bruker, German) with FASTSCAN-A probe in ScanAsyst mode under ambient conditions. Scanning frequency was 1.95 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of AuNR/Ags by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AuNR/Ags were imaged using AFM. The samples for AFM were prepared by dispensing the solvent (1 ×  PBS) containing the nanostructures (1000 µg/ml) on a silicon (Si) substrate at several spots. The substrate was dried overnight in a chemical fume hood. The tapping mode of Bruker Fastscan AFM (Bruker, Billerica, MA) was utilized to scan the nanostructures with a scan rate of 1 Hz and 256 samples per line. Both height and phase images were recorded during the scanning. The Bruker Nanoscope Analysis software (version 1.8) was used to refine the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peptide Nanostructure Morphology Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prepared peptide mixtures of 3 and 5 were re-dissolved in water at 0.4 mM and 2 μL was placed on a freshly peeled mica surface glued to a 12 mm metal AFM specimen disc. The mica was covered with a Petri dish to avoid any possible contamination and air dried in a fume hood. Prior to microscopy, each sample was further dried with a gentle stream of N2 gas. Morphological characterization was carried out using a Bruker Fastscan AFM (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Images were obtained using peakforce-tapping mode with Fastscan C probes (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) with a nominal spring force constant of 0.8 N m−1. Topographic and phase were simultaneously obtained at a resolution of 512 × 512 using a scan frequency of 2 Hz with typical scan sizes 5 μm × 5 μm. 15 images per sample were taken and images were processed using Gwyddion 2.45 software. Fibre dimensions were quantified by using line sectioning and height dimensions were averaged as previously described.28 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cisplatin-Mediated Cytotoxicity in HepG2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA-strands with the prescribed parameters and sequences were obtained from Sangon Biotechnology Company, Shanghai, China. Cisplatin (CPT; 99% purity) was purchased from Shanghai-Chemicals Company, Shanghai, China. MTT-reagent (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol, 2 yl) 2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium-bromide; 99% purity) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). HepG2 cells were provided by Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. Fast-Scan AFM by Bruker, USA was used for imaging and characterization of nanoparticles. Flow cytometry experiments were performed using a BD/LSR-FortessaX-20 flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). Ninety-six-well plates were analyzed for UV–Vis measurements using a MultiScan-FC microplate-photometer by Thermo Fisher (Waltham, USA). The microliter volume samples were analyzed for UV–Vis measurements using a Thermo Fisher Nanodrop-2000c spectrometer (USA). Gel analysis was performed using a gel-apparatus by BioRad-Labs (CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal Microscopy Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscope images were obtained using a Supra 40VP scanning electron microscope with an Inlens SE Detector (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, LLC, White Plains, NY). Atomic force microscope imaging was performed using a FastScan AFM with ScanAsyst-Air tips (Bruker, Billerica, MA). Electronic FET measurements were carried out on a manual analytical probe station (Signatone, Gilroy, CA) equipped with a Keithley 4200A SCS (Tektronix, Beaverton, OR) or an Agilent 4156B semiconductor parameter analyzer (Santa Clara, CA). Optical images were taken with a digital camera attached to a Zeiss Axiotech optical microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!