The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software version 25.0 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows is a comprehensive statistical analysis and data management software. It provides a wide range of tools for data manipulation, analysis, and visualization. The software is designed to handle various types of data and offers a user-friendly interface for conducting statistical tests and generating reports.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

32 protocols using spss software version 25.0 for windows

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), wherever appropriate. Normally distributed data were compared by Student’s t-tests. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Postoperative Outcomes in Intestinal BD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test, and continuous variables were analyzed using Student’s t-test. The relationship between CRP level and postoperative outcomes of intestinal BD was measured using logistic regression analysis. Other clinical factors were identified by multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard regression model. Furthermore, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to evaluate the accuracy of the results and to specify a cut-off value. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Methods for Prognostic Analysis in IPF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous baseline characteristics were summarised using the mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, whereas categorical characteristics were summarised using frequencies and percentages. Normally distributed quantitative data were compared using the analysis of variance. Quantitative data that were not normally distributed were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Qualitative data were compared using the chi-squared test. The survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the prognostic impact of malignancies in patients with IPF. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated. All the analyses were two-tailed, and p values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nonparametric Statistical Analysis of Continuous Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous data were presented as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Mann‐Whitney U test was used to compare groups. A P value of less than .05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Campylobacter Enumeration and Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Before statistical analysis, individual Campylobacter counts were transformed to log10 counts and then used as the experimental unit. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test the normal distribution of the data. Since our data did not meet criteria of normal distribution, we applied pairwise comparisons using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test. To ensure alpha error of 0.05, β-error of 0.18 and power of 0.80, 90 animals per group were included in the present study. In order to determine statistically significant differences, 36 animals were sampled during the animal trial. Probability (p)-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Factors in Gestational Diabetes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality of distribution for continuous variables was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Then the data conforming to the normal distribution was described by mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the unpaired Student’s t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences among groups. For qualitative data, the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was performed. In addition, the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was also tested by the chi-square test. The HWE was a principle stating that the participants were representative of the population. The relationship between SNP genotypes and GDM risks was analyzed by multiple logistic regression. All tests were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed by using SPSS Software, Version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), wherever appropriate. Normally distributed data were compared by Student's t-tests. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Inflammatory Markers in Neo-CRT Response Prediction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 was considered indicative of a statistically significant difference. Continuous variables were compared between the two groups using the t test, whereas categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the ability of each inflammatory marker to predict the Neo-CRT response. The Youden index was used to determine the optimal cutoff thresholds for subsequent analysis. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of death from any cause, and disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date on which recurrence, either local or distant, was first detected or to the date of death from any cause. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess predictors of prognosis. Variables with P < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were examined by multivariate analysis. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method, with the log-rank test applied to compare survival curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Campylobacter Enumeration in Animal Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental data were analyzed using SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Data were analyzed for normal distribution using the Shapirow-Wilk Test. As data were not normally distributed, we used the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Campylobacter counts were logarithmically transformed (log10) and then analyzed for significant differences using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. P-values below 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. To ensure an alpha error of 0.05, a beta error of 0.18, and power of 0.80, a total of 90 animals per group were included in the present study. In order to determine statistically significant differences, 36 animals were sampled during the experiment, and the differences calculated by using a biologically relevant difference of delta = 1 log unit between Campylobacter counts of the groups and assuming a standard deviation of 1 log unit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Anti-TNF Discontinuation and Relapse Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are expressed as median with interquartile range, while categorical variables are presented as absolute values and percentages. Continuous variables were analyzed using the unpaired Student t-test and Mann-Whitney U test, while categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test and Fisher exact test. Using the Cox hazards model, the risk factors for relapse after anti-TNF cessation were investigated. The survival curve representing the cumulative rate of relapse after discontinuation of anti-TNF was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!