The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using ultraflex maldi tof mass spectrometer

1

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Lead Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The treatment procedure of the lead compounds was the same as for the total DNA quantification. The SDS-PAGE was carried out followed by Coomassie blue staining. The bands were taken and digested with trypsin for 12 h. Trichloroacetic acid (0.5%) was employed to acidify the digested proteins. The MALDI-mass analysis was carried out on a Bruker Ultraflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer. The spectra were collected from 400 shots per spectrum over an m/z range of 600 ∼ 3000, and calibrated by 4-point internal calibration. The fold change of the protein expression after lead compound treatment was estimated by band quantification of Prodigy Samespots analysis software. The protein masses were assigned and used for a database search with the MASCOT search engine1. The detailed information of mass/mass analysis was the same as previous study (Pan et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Identification by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pull-down products containing eluted proteins were boiled, subjected to 8–16% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and visualized by silver staining or Western blotting. Each protein band was excised, destained, reduced, alkylated, and digested with trypsin. To extract the polypeptides, gel particles were subjected twice to consecutive 20 mM sodium bicarbonate and 5% formic acid in 50% acetonitrile treatments. The supernatants were combined and lyophilized, and the dried polypeptides were recovered by adding 10 μL of 0.1% formic acid, followed by sonication for 1 min. The recovered polypeptides were further purified using a ZipTip C18 column (Millipore, Billerica, MA), and eluted with acetonitrile to a final volume of 3 μL. Protein bands were excised and identified using in-gel trypsin digestion, then analyzed using a Bruker Ultraflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bremen, Germany). After removing the masses derived from the standards, trypsin, matrix proteins, and keratins, the monoisotopic mass lists for each protonated peptide were subjected to database searches, and mass lists were exported to the Biotool 2.0 software package to perform peptide mass fingerprinting, using the Mascot (http://www.matrixscience.com) algorithm scoring to identify proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biophysical Characterization of Cereal AMPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide fragments of wheat and barley AMP-like peptides were produced by solid-phase synthesis using Fmoc chemistry (Elabscience Biotechnology Inc., Wuhan, China). The synthesized peptides were purified by RP-HPLC. Their identity to the required sequences was proved by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometric analysis on an Ultraflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) in a linear or reflector positive ion mode using α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as a matrix.
The following characteristics of the synthesized peptides were calculated using the ExPASy ProtParam tool [41 ]: molecular weight, pI, net charge at pH 7, GRAVY index and aliphatic index. Hydrophobic moment μH was calculated with HeliQuest [42 (link)]. The Boman index was computed using APD3 [43 (link)]. The prediction of antimicrobial properties was carried out with CAMPR3 [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification and Characterization of Crude Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crude lyophilized peptides were purified using high performance liquid chromatography (Waters, Milford, MA) on a Phenomenox® Luna C18 column (Torrance, CA) in buffer A (0.1% TFA in ddH2O) with a gradient of 0–30% buffer B (0.1% TFA in acetonitrile) over 85 min. All peptides were characterized on a Bruker Ultraflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
More than 1.5-fold increased or decreased silver-stained spots were excised and in-gel digested with trypsin according to procedures described previously [17 (link)-19 (link)]. Briefly, the gels were destained by 1% potassium ferricyanide and 1.6% sodium thiosulfate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The proteins were then reduced with 25 mM NH4HCO3 containing 10 mM DTT (Biosynth, Switzerland) at 60°C for 30 min and alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide (Amersham Biosciences, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) at room temperature for 30 min. After reduction and alkylation, the proteins were digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) (20 mg/ml) at 37°C overnight. After digestion, the tryptic peptides were acidified with 0.5% TCA and loaded onto an MTP Anchor Chip™ 600/384 TF (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed on an Ultraflex™ MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik). Mono-isotopic peptide masses were assigned and used for database searches with the MASCOT search engine (http://www.matrixscience.com) (Matrix Science, London, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MALDI-TOF MS Analysis of rPIIIA Analogues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Qualitative analyses of rPIIIA and other analogues were performed using a previously described MALDI-TOF/MS-based method with modifications [47 (link)]. In summary, after centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min, the supernatant of the CFPS reaction mixture or other purified solutions treated with Enterokinase were desalted using ZIPTIP C18 (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and subjected to MALDI-TOF MS. MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed using an Ultraflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA), equipped with a 50 Hz pulsed nitrogen laser (λ = 355 nm) and a 19 KV accelerating voltage operated in reflectron, positive ion mode. The samples were prepared by mixing 1 μL peptide solution with 1 μL of saturated matrix (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) in 0.1% TFA containing 30% ACN. Data collection and processing were respectively performed by FlexControl and FlexAnalysis software (V2.4, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

MALDI-TOF Analysis of Tryptic Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fractions excised from 2D electrophoresis slab gels were hydrolyzed by trypsin digestion. The extracted tryptic peptides were analyzed by MALDI-TOF as described previously, with some modifications. A sample (0.5 μl) was mixed with the same volume of 20% (v/v) acetonitrile solution containing 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid and 20 mg/ml 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and then air-dried. Mass spectras were obtained on a Reflex III MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer with a UV laser (336 nm) in positive-ion mode in the range of 500–8,000 Da. Calibration was performed in accordance with the known peaks of trypsin autolysis.
For MS/MS analysis, the mass spectra of fragments were recorded with a Bruker Ultraflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer in tandem mode (TOF-TOF) with detection of positive ions. The proteins were identified using Mascot software in Peptide Fingerprint mode (Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA). The accuracy of the mass measurement MH+ was 0.01% (with a possibility of modifying cysteine by acrylamide and methionine oxidation). Raw data and search results could be found on PeptideAtlas: http://www.peptideatlas.org/PASS/PASS01450.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Identification by MALDI-TOF MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted protein spots were excised from the gels and digested with trypsin as previously described [27 (link)]. The tryptic peptides were acidified with 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and loaded onto an MTP AnchorChip™ 600/384 TF (Bruker-Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) after digestion. MS analysis was conducted using the Ultraflex™ MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker-Daltonik). Monoisotopic peptide masses were assigned and utilized for database searches with the MASCOT search engine (version 2.2.04, Matrix Science, London, UK). Search parameters were enacted as follows: a maximum allowed peptide mass error of 50 ppm, and consideration of one incomplete cleavage per peptide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In-Gel Tryptic Digestion and MALDI-TOF MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein spots of interest were excised and in-gel digested with trypsin as previously described [39 (link)]. Briefly, tryptic peptides were acidified with 0.5% TFA and loaded onto an MTP AnchorChip™ 600/384 TF (Bruker-Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). The MS analysis was performed on an Ultraflex™ MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker-Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) and the monoisotopic peptide masses were applied for database searches with the MASCOT search engine [http://www.matrixscience.com].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MALDI-TOF MS analysis of rArIB proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For rArIB and rArIB (V11L, V16A), MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed on an Ultraflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA), equipped with a 50 Hz pulsed nitrogen laser (λ = 355 nm) and a 19KV accelerating voltage operated in reflectron, positive ion mode. The samples were prepared by mixing 1 μL peptide solution with 1 μL matrix (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) saturated solution in 0.1% TFA containing 30% ACN. Data collection and processing was respectively performed by FlexControl 2.4 and FlexAnalysis 2.4 (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!