The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Matrigel coated membrane matrix

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in United States

Matrigel-coated membrane matrix is a laboratory product that provides a pre-coated, extracellular matrix-like substrate for cell culture. It serves as a barrier that selectively allows the passage of specific molecules while retaining others.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using matrigel coated membrane matrix

1

Cell Invasion Assay on Matrigel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PATU8988 and PANC‐1 cells were seeded onto a Matrigel coated membrane matrix (BD Bioscience, NY, USA) present in the insert of a 24‐well culture plate. Fetal bovine serum was added to the lower chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 h, the noninvading cells were gently removed with a cottons swab. Invasive cells located on the lower surface of chamber were stained with the 0.1% crystal violet and counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gastric Cancer Cell Invasion and Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion and migration of gastric cancer cells upon downregulation of PEBP4 were analyzed by a Transwell chamber (Corning Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA, USA) assay. The TSGH and AGS cells treated with siRNA-PEBP4 or siRNA-control (1×105 cells/ml) were added to the upper chamber. The lower chamber of the Transwell was filled with 500 μl DMEM containing 10% FBS as a chemo-attractant. After 24 h incubation, cells on the surface of the upper chamber were removed by scraping with a cotton swab. The migrated cells on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma, MO) and counted. These experiments were repeated three times.
For the invasion assay, cells were seeded onto a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) in a 24-well culture plate for 24 h after transfection. The cells that did not invade through the pores were carefully wiped with cotton wool. Then, cells located on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma, MO) and counted. These experiments were repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

NFATC3-PLA2G15 Knockdown Regulates Colo-320 Cell Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3×105 colo-320 cells were stably transfected with si-control and si-NFATC3-PLA2G15 and 3×104 cells were seeded on the Matrigel-coated membrane matrix (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) insert well according to manufacturer’s instructions after 48 hours. Media containing 20% FBS was added as a chemoattractant to the wells of the Matrigel invasion chamber for 24 hours. The following day, the cells were fixed for 10 minutes in 3.7% paraformaldehyde and the insert was washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Crystal violet (0.1%) was added to the insert for 10 minutes and washed twice with PBS, and then with water. A cotton swab was used to remove any non-invading cells and the insert was washed again. The number of invading cells was imaged using a microscope equipped with a digital camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A wound-healing assay was performed to assess the cell migration ability. An artificial wound was created on a confluent cell monolayer 24 hours after transfection. Images were taken at 0, 24, 48 hours and percentage of open wound was calculated.
HGC-27 and MGC-803 cells were seeded onto a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix (BD Bioscience) present in the insert of a 24 well culture plate. FBS was added to the lower chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 hours, invasive cells located on the lower surface of chamber were stained with the 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma) and counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Matrigel Invasion Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion and migration of the cells was evaluated by assessing the ability of cells to pass through a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, CA, USA). The cells were seeded onto a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix, placed in the insert of a 24-well culture plate, 24 h after transfection. FBS was added to the lower chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 h, the invasive cells located on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich) and were counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wound-healing assays were performed to assess cell migration. An artificial wound was created 24 hours after transfection by using a 200-µL pipette tip on the confluent cell monolayer. Mitomycin C was then added to the culture wells. To visualize cell migration and wound healing, images were taken at 0, 24, and 48 hours.
Invasion assays were performed by examining the ability of cells to pass through a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix (BD Biosciences). Cells were seeded 24 hours after transfection onto a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix that was present in the insert of a 24-well culture plate. Fetal bovine serum was added to the non-invading cells that were removed. Invasive cells that were located on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma) and were then counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating miR-22 Regulation of Invasion and Migration in Gastric Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SGC-7901 and HGC-27 cells were grown to 50–70% confluence and transfected with miR-NC, miR-22 mimics, si_con, si_MMP14#1, si_MMP14#2, si_Snail#1, si_Snail#2, pcDNA3.1 vector, pcDNA3.1-MMP14 vector or pcDNA3.1-Snail vector, co-transfected with miR-22 mimics and pcDNA3.1-MMP14, or co-transfected with miR-22 mimics and pcDNA3.1-Snail, respectively. AGS cells were transfected with miR-NC or anti-miR-22 inhibitor. Twenty-four hours posttransfection for invasion assay, cells were seeded onto a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) present in the insert of a 24-well culture plate (Costar, Corning, NY, USA). In the lower chamber, 500 μl DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum was added as chemoattractant. After 24 h, the noninvading cells were gently removed with a cotton swab. Invasive cells located on the lower surface of chamber were stained with the 0.1% crystal violet and counted under a microscope in five predetermined fields (× 200). The procedure for the cell migration assay was similar to the cell invasion assay, except that the transwell membranes were not precoated with matrigel. Cells adhering to the lower surface were counted the same way as the cell invasion assay. All assays were independently repeated at least three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Cell Invasion with RHOQ Plasmids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the in vitro invasion assay, cells were transfected with plasmids encoding WT RHOQ and edited RHOQ. Forty-eight hours post-transfection, cells were seeded on a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix (BD) in the insert of a 24-well culture plate. Fetal bovine serum was added to the lower chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 h, the noninvading cells were gently removed with a cotton swab. Migrating cells located on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with the Diff-Quick Staining Set (Dade) and counted under a Bio-Rad Gel DOC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 1.5-mL base layer of agar (0.5% agar in DMEM with 10% FBS) was allowed to solidify in a six-well flat-bottom plate before the addition of a 1.5 mL cell suspension containing 4,000 cells in 0.35% agar in DMEM with 10% FBS. The cell-containing layer was then solidified at 4°C for 20 minutes. Colonies were allowed to grow for 21 days at 37°C with 5% CO2 before imaging.
A wound-healing assay was performed to assess effects on cell migration. An artificial wound was created on a confluent cell monolayer using a 200μL pipette tip 24 hours after transient transfection. Mitomycin C was added to the culture wells (final concentration for PANC-1, 10 μg/mL; for MIA PaCa-2, 20 μg/mL) to prevent proliferation. Images of the migration/wound healing process were captured at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours [28 (link)].
Invasion was evaluated by the ability of cells to pass through a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA). Twenty-four hours after transient transfection, cells were seeded onto a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix in a 24-well culture plate. Fetal bovine serum was added to the lower chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 hours, non-invading cells were removed. Invasive cells, located on the lower surface of the chamber, were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma—Aldrich, MO, USA) and counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Wound Healing and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A wound-healing assay was done to assess cell migration. An artificial wound was created 24 hours after transfection using a 200-µL pipette tip on the confluent cell monolayer and mitomyclin C was added to the culture wells. To visualize migrated cells and wound healing, images were taken at 0, 24 and 48 hours.
Invasion assay was evaluated by the ability of cells passing through Matrigel-coated membrane matrix (BD Biosciences). Cells were seeds onto a Matrigel-coated membrane matrix present in the insert of a 24-well culture plate 24 hours after transfection. Fetal bovine serum was added to the noninvading cells were removed. Invasive cells located on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma) and counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!