The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using millex hv hydrophilic pvdf

1

Quantitative Analysis of Organic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the present study, chemicals with analytical purity were used. Organic acid standards (citric acid, tartaric acid, oxalic acid, malic acid, succinic acid and fumaric acid), sugar standards (glucose, fructose, and sucrose), and vitamin C standards (l-ascorbic acid) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The other chemicals were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
For organic acid extraction, the method by Bevilacqua and Califano [18 (link)] was modified. About 200 g of samples was fragmented and 10 g from each sample was delivered to centrifuge tubes. The 10 ml of 0.009 N H2SO4 was added to the samples and the samples were homogenized with Heidolph Silent Crusher M, Germany. Then, the samples were mixed for an hour with a shaker (Heidolph Unimax 1010, Germany) and centrifuged at 14.000 × rpm for 15 min. The supernatants were passed through coarse filter paper, then twice through a 0.45 mm membrane filter (Millipore Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore, USA), and last in a SEP-PAK C18 cartridge. The concentration of organic acids was determined by HPLC using an Aminex column (HPX-87H, 300 mm × 7.8 mm, Bio-Rad) fitted on an Agilent 1100 series HPLC G 1322 A, Germany) [18 (link)]. Organic acids were detected at 214 and 280 nm wavelengths. The mobile phase, 0.009 N H2SO4 was passed through a 0.45 μm filter membrane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Organic Acid Profiling of Service Tree Fruit

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were kept in
a deep freezer (−80 °C) until the analysis. In the study,
citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, and fumaric
acid contents of organic acids were determined in a service tree fruit.
The method given by Bevilacqua and Califano26 (link) was modified and used for the extraction of organic acids. 50 g
of the service tree samples were taken and transferred to centrifuge
tubes. 20 mL of 0.009 N H2SO4 was added to these
samples and homogenized (Heidolph Silent Crusher M, Germany). Then,
it was mixed for 1 h on a shaker (Heidolph Unimax 1010, Germany) and
centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min. The aqueous fraction separated
in the centrifuge was first passed through a coarse filter paper,
then twice through a 0.45 μm membrane filter (Millipore Millex-HV
Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore, USA), and finally through the SEP-PAK
C18 cartridge. Samples were analyzed in an HPLC instrument (Agilent
HPLC 1100 series G 1322 A, Germany). An Aminex HPX-87 H, 300 mm ×
7.8 mm column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA) was used in
the HPLC system, and the device was controlled by a computer with
an Agilent package program. The DAD detector (Agilent, USA) in the
system is tuned to 214 and 280 nm wavelengths. In the study, 0.009
N H2SO4 passed through a 0.45 μm membrane
filter was used as the mobile phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of Organic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Organic acids identified by the technique reported by Bevilacqua and Califano [56 (link)]. Organic acid standards used in research; oxalic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, citric acid and fumaric acid standards were prepared at the levels of 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 ppm and formed curves. Each sample (50 g) mixed with 80 mL of 0.009 N H2SO4 (Heidolph Silent Crusher M, Berlin, Germany), then homogenized for 1 h with a shaker (Heidolph Unimax 1010, Berlin, Germany). The mixture centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000 rpm, and supernatants filtrated twice with 0.45 µm membrane filter following filtration with coarse filter (Millipore Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and run through a SEP-PAK C18 cartridge. Organic acid readings performed with HPLC using Aminex column (HPX—87 H, 300 mm × 7.8 mm, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA) at 214 and 280 nm wavelengths, on Agilent package program (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Organic Acids Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of organic acids in fresh and dried samples was carried out with a modification of the method reported by Bevilacqua and Califano [74 (link)]. A quantity of 10 g of sample was placed in centrifuge tubes and then 10 mL of 0.009 N sulfuric acid was added to the samples and homogenized. The samples were mixed for 1 h and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min. The liquid (supernatant) remaining at the top of the centrifuge tube was filtered through filter paper, then passed through a 0.45 μm membrane filter (Millipore Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore, USA) and finally through a SEP-PAK C18 cartridge. It was injected into the HPLC (Agilent HPLC 1100 series G 1322 A, Germany) device and the separations were performed on the appropriate column (Aminex HPX—87 H, 300 mm × 7.8 mm). Organic acids were determined at wavelengths of 214 and 280 nm. A quantity of 0.009 N H2SO4 solution was used as mobile phase [74 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Phenolic Compounds in Medlar Fruit, Leaf, and Seed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bioactive content and phenolic compounds of leaf, fruit, and seed samples of common medlar (M. germanica) and Stern’s medlar (M. canescens) collected from southern and northern regions of Iran, were studied. Total phenolic content of fruit extracts was measured using the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent method with spectrophotometry (Singleton & Rossi, 1965 ). For determination of total flavonoid content, the method described by Grzegorczyk‐Karolak et al. (2015 (link)) was adopted. The phenolic compounds were determined according to the modified method of Rodriguez‐Delgado et al. (2001 (link)). The samples were diluted with distilled water in a ratio of 1:1, and centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000 g. Following initial filtration with filter paper and twice with 0.45 μm membrane filter (Millipore Millex‐HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore), the supernatants were passed through HPLC. Chromatographic analysis was performed by Agilent 1100 (Agilent) HPLC system using DAD detector (Agilent) with 250 × 4.60 mm, 4 μm ODS column (HiChrom). As a mobile phase, Solvent A methanol:acetic acid:water (10:2:28) and Solvent B methanol:acetic acid:water (90:2:8) were used, with a flow rate of 1 ml/min and 20 μl injection volume for spectral measurements at 254 and 280 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction and Quantification of Organic Acids in Berries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The organic acids were extracted according to Wu et al. (2022) [19 (link)]. In total, 5 g each of B. nummularia and B. atrocarpa fruit powder were mixed with 25 mL water, and then placed into an ultrasonic bath for 60 min continuously at 80 °C at a frequency of 40 kHz. The solution was further centrifuged at 9050× g/min at 20 °C for 15 min. The supernatants were collected, then filtered by 0.22 µm membrane (Millipore Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The organic acids were detected by an HPLC (Agilent 1260, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with variable wavelength vacuum chromatograph and high-efficiency UV detector. The system was equipped with a C18 AQ (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) and DAD detector. The mobile phase consisted of 1% phosphoric acid solution (97.5%) and methanol (2.5%), the flow rate was 0.5 mL/min, and the temperature was 35 °C. The injection volume was 10 μL, and the run time was 15 min. A wavelength of 210 nm was employed to detect the organic acids. An external mixed standard of tartaric acid, malic acid, acetic acid, citric acid and fumaric acid was prepared at a concentration of 0–1 mg/mL (Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Vitamin C Quantification in Fruits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vitamin C content of fruits detected with a modified HPLC procedure suggested by Cemeroglu [57 ]. Fruit extracts (50 g) supplemented with 2.5% (w v−1) metaphosphoric acid (Sigma, M6285, 33.5%, Taufkirchen, Germany), then centrifuged at 6500 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C temperature. 0.5 mL of the mixture brought to a final volume of 10 mL with % 2.5 (w v−1) metaphosphoric acid. Supernatants filtered with a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter (Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore, Taufkirchen, Germany). C18 column (Phenomenex Luna C18, 250 × 4.60 mm, 5 µL) was used for the identification of ascorbic acid at a temperature of 25 °C. Double-distilled water with 1 mL min−1 flow rate and pH of 2.2 (acidified with H2SO4) used as a mobile phase. Spectral measurements made at 254 nm wavelength using a DAD detector. Different standards of Vitamin C (Sigma A5960) (50, 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppm) used for quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Organic Acid Extraction from Fruit Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method of Bevilacqua and Califano [26 (link)] was modified and used in the extraction of organic acids. 5 g of the obtained fruit samples were taken and transferred to centrifuge tubes. These samples were homogenized by adding 20 mL of 0.009 N H2SO4 (Heidolph Silent Crusher M, Schwabach, Germany). Then it was stirred for 1 h on a shaker (Heidolph Unimax 1010, Germany) and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min. The aqueous fraction separated in the centrifuge was first passed through coarse filter paper, then twice through a 0.45 μm membrane filter (Millipore Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and finally through the SEP-PAK C18 cartridge. Organic acids were analyzed in a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) instrument (Agilent HPLC 1100 series G 1322 A, Germany) using the method specified by Bevilacqua and Califano [26 (link)]. Aminex HPX -87 H, 300 mm × 7.8 mm column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA) was used in the HPLC system and the device was controlled by a computer with Agilent package program (Figure 2). The DAD detector in the system (Agilent, USA) is tuned to 214 and 280 nm wavelengths. In the study, 0.009 N H2SO4 passed through a 0.45 μm membrane filter was used as the mobile phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC technique was employed for the determination of phenolic compounds by modification of the method by Rodriguez-Delgado et al. [27 (link)]. An amount of 5 g from each homogenized sample was diluted with distilled water (1:1) and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter (Millipore Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Burlington, MA, USA). HPLC analysis was realized by Agilent 1100 series HPLC equipment, with ODS column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 4 µm (HiChrom, Chadds Ford, PA, USA)) and mobile phase composed of Solvent A (methanol/acetic acid/water (10:2:88, v/v/v)) and Solvent B (methanol/acetic acid/water (90:2:8, v/v/v) with a gradient program. For the identification of chromatographic data, a DAD detector (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used, with spectral determination at 254 and 280 nm. Samples were identified and quantified by standards. The results were expressed as mg/100 g fw.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Haloalkaliphilic Actinomycete

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The selected haloalkaliphilic actinomycete, Streptomyces spp. AJ8 was inoculated into starch casein broth and incubated at 28 °C on a shaker (200–250 rpm) for 7 days. The culture broth was filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filter (Millipore Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF) and the filtrate was extracted with ethyl acetate, chloroform and methanol (1:1v/v) and shaken vigorously for 1 h in a solvent extraction funnel. Solvent and filtrate mixture were stabilized for 24–48 h and separated from aqueous phase. The extracts were concentrated in a rotary evaporator and lyophilized (Al-Hulu et al. 2012 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!