The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bond max autostainer system

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in United States

The Bond-Max Autostainer System is a laboratory equipment product designed for automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) staining procedures. The system automates the staining process, allowing for consistent and reproducible results across multiple samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using bond max autostainer system

1

Immunohistochemical Staining of SOX2 and OCT4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunohistochemical staining was performed with Leica Microsystems Bond-Max Autostainer System as previously described [29 (link)]. The 5-µm thick specimen sections were deparaffinized at 60oC using 60-minute incubation with the Bond Dewax Solution. The antigen retrieval was performed by incubating slides with the Bond Epitope Retrieval Solution 2 for 30 min at 100oC, followed by 5-minute incubation with 3 % hydrogen peroxide.
Primary antibodies used were the rabbit polyclonal anti-SOX2 antibody (clone SP76, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA) at 1:100 dilution and the mouse monoclonal ant-OCT4 antibody (clone sc-5279, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) at 1:300 dilution. The immunohistochemical procedure was performed using the Bond Polymer Refine Detection kit (Leica Microsystems), a 3-step indirect immunoperoxidase technique. The primary antibodies were applied for 40 min at room temperature, followed by 8 min incubation with the Post Primary Polymer and the Polymer Poly-HRP IgG, respectively. The sections were then incubated with diaminobenzidine for 4 min and counterstained with hematoxylin. The Bond Wash Solution was used to rinse between each step. As positive controls, tonsillar tissue (Fig. 1J) and germinoma (Fig. 1K) samples were used for SOX2 and OCT4 immunostainings, respectively. Negative controls were prepared using isotype-matched antibodies (Fig. 1L).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Cancer Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunohistochemical staining was performed with a Leica Microsystems Bond-Max Autostainer System according to manufacturer protocols. Arid1a (clone EPR13501–73, Abcam, dilution 1:1000), met (clone 4F8.2, Sigma Aldrich, dilution 1:250), pten (clone 138G6, Cell Signaling, dilution 1:100) and p53 (clone DO-1, Immunotech, dilution 1:50) were applied to consecutive 4-μm FFPE TMA sections. Appropriate positive and negative controls were run concurrently. Representative cases altered in p53, arid1a and met are shown in Supplementary Figure S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of E- and N-Cadherin Expression in Glioma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Areas with a high cellularity were selected for tissue microarrays. Immunohistochemical staining was performed as described previously [12 (link)]. E-cadherin (1:50 dilution; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark; Catalogue No. M3612) and N-cadherin (1:500 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Catalogue No. ab12221) antibodies were applied into a Bond-max autostainer system (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL, USA). Antigen retrieval was carried out using citrate buffer at pH 6.0. Negative controls were prepared without using primary antibodies.
All immunostained slides were evaluated twice by two independent observers (NMG and LKH) with no knowledge of the clinical details. E- and N-cadherin immunohistochemistry showed cytoplastmic positivity in glioma cells and sometimes stained the cytoplasmic borders. The intensity of staining was initially classified into 4 grades: 0, no immunoreaction; 1, weak positivity; 2, moderate positivity; and 3, strong reactivity. With N-cadherin staining, cases of grades 0 and 1 positivity were grouped as a low-expression, and cases of grades 2 and 3 as a high-expression for statistical convenience. Two pathologists re-evaluated cases with discordant staining intensity together and made concessions for such cases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplex IHC Analysis of FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FFPE sections (4 μm) from tissue blocks containing representative core samples were stained for immunohistochemical analysis and observed using a Leica Microsystems Bond-Max Autostainer System.
The following primary antibodies were used: anti-PDX1(1/500, rabbit monoclonal, clone EPR3358(2), ab134150; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-SALL4 (1/100, mouse monoclonal, clone 6E3, ab57577; Abcam), and anti-PTF1A (1/200; mouse monoclonal, clone 1A2, H00256297-M05; Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan). Not all cases were stained for all markers owing to limitations in specimen size and block availability.
The number of positive cells and staining intensity scores were evaluated using an open software for positive cell detection in QuPath 0.3.2 (https://qupath.github.io, accessed on December 15, 2022). For each case, the chromogenic stain is observed on the left side and stain with cell detection on the right side. QuPath detects negative or positive cells as blue or red (Fig. 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistostaining of FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistostaining was performed with Leica Microsystems Bond-Max Autostainer System using the antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 3 on 3-μm FFPE sections from tissue blocks containing representative core samples. Immunolabeling for all antibodies was performed according to manufacturer protocols; normal intestinal tissue was used as positive control. Sections incubated without the primary antibodies served as negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cav-1 and SNAIL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All immunostained slides were evaluated twice by experienced pathologists (LJH and LKH) blinded to the clinical details. IHC was performed as described previously [43 (link)]. Tissue sections were immunostained with specific antibodies against Cav-1 (1:800, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and SNAIL (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) using a Bond-Max autostainer system (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Negative controls were processed in the absence of primary antibodies. The Cav-1 antibody stained the cytoplasmic borders and cytoplasm of cancer cells. The SNAIL antibody mainly stained the cytoplasm of cancer cells. The staining intensity in cancer cells was initially graded according to the following criteria: 0, no staining; 1, weak staining; 2, moderate staining; and 3, strong staining. Samples were grouped according to staining intensities of 0–1 (low expression) and 2–3 (high expression). These samples were also grouped according to staining intensity as described above (Fig. 1b).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4-µm sections were consecutively cut from paraffin blocks and deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a graded alcohol series. Immunostaining was performed using the BOND-MAX autostainer system (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Antigen retrieval was performed using a microwave submerged in pH 6.0 citratephosphate buffer. The following primary antibodies were used: DNA-PKcs (1:250; Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, USA), Akt3 (1:30; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, USA), GSK-3β (1:80; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and p53 (1:100; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The slides were counter-stained with Mayer's hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!