The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using smad3

1

Genetic Manipulation of Cellular Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 1, cells were seeded into NunclonTM Delta Surface plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark), and transfected twice, on days 2 and 3, serum-free with either 25 or 50 nM of prevalidated siRNAs specific for RAC1B [6 (link)], SMAD2, SMAD3 (both from Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA), BGN [7 (link)], or the respective scrambled controls, and/or pcDNA3-based expression vectors for SMAD3, SMAD3-mut3A, or SMAD2, for 4 h using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies). Additional validation of these siRNAs was performed for RAC1B [6 (link)] and SMAD2/SMAD3 (this study).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Validation of Smad2 and Smad3 Knockout in Cardiac Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to confirm loss of Smad2 and Smad3 in cardiac fibroblasts, cells were isolated from Smad2 fl/fl, FS2KO, Smad3 fl/fl, and FS3KO mice at 4 weeks after tamoxifen injection and cultured in DMEM/F12 (Gibco™, 11320082) with 10% FBS (Gibco™, 10100147) as described above. Briefly, medium was changed every 48h and experiments were performed on fibroblasts at passage 1, when cells grew to 80%−90% confluence (100mm dish). Protein was extracted from cardiac fibroblasts as previously described (34 (link)). Western blotting was performed using antibodies to Smad2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 5339), Smad3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9523), and GAPDH (Santa Cruz, 25778). The gels were imaged by ChemiDoc™ MP System (Bio Rad) and analyzed by Image Lab 3.0 software (Bio Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Regulation of TGF-β1-induced α-SMA by Smad2/3 knockdown

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pre-designed Smad2 (Ambion, Austin, TX) and Smad3 (Thermo, PA, USA) siRNAs were transfected into cells using siPORT™ NeoFX™ Transfection Agent (Ambion) at a concentration of 20 nM. The siRNA-transfection reagent complexes were prepared as described by the manufacturer. Cells were treated with or without 5 ng/mL TGF-β1 in the presence or absence of different concentrations of thalidomide for 48 h. The efficiency of siRNA gene silencing was evaluated with western blots for Smad2 and Smad3. The effect of siRNA transfection on TGF-β1-induced α-SMA production was analyzed by western blotting as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Investigating siRNA-mediated Knockdown in PAECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ON TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNA (Horizon), Silencer Select siRNA (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Gene Silencer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (see list below) were transfected into PAECs by the 4D Nucleofector Core unit using p5 Primary Cell Solution according to manufacturer’s recommendations (Lonza). The knockdown efficiency was determined by qPCR and immunoblotting. PAECs transfected with siRNA were incubated for 48 hours, and then treated with 10 μg/mL of HERV-K dUTPase for 72 hours.
siRNAs used for transfection: TLR4 (Ambion, catalog s14194); TLR2 (Ambion, catalog s162); TLR6 (Ambion, catalog s20215); MYD88 (Ambion, catalog s9134); NRP1 (Dharmacon, catalog L019484); ENG (Dharmacon, catalog L011026); MCAM (Ambion, catalog s8572); RELA (Ambion, catalog s11915); SMAD3 (Ambion, catalog s535079); STAT1 (Ambion, catalog s279); ATF2 (Santa Cruz, catalog sc29205); Negative Control No.1 (Ambion, catalog 4390844); Nontargeting Control (Dharmacon, catalog D001810); and Control siRNA-A (Santa Cruz, catalog Sc37007).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Analysis of Immune Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation of sections, immunohistochemistry, confocal microscopy, apoptosis TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling) assay and image analysis were performed as previously described [29 (link)]. Lungs and spleens were immune-stained with anti-DTA (Cat#4701, ViroStat, Portland, ME, USA), cleaved Cas-3 (Cat# 9664S, Cell Signaling, MA, USA), P-53 (Cat# SC-6243, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), Mad1 (Cat# 4682, Cell Signaling, MA, USA), E2F1 (Cat# MA5-14344, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), F4/80(Cat# ab6640, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), Smad3 (Cat# 51-1500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), Katushka (Cat# AB233, Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) antibodies at 1:200 dilution and with a TUNEL kit (MBL international, Woburn, MA, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Donkey anti-Goat IgG (H+L) secondary antibodies conjugated with Cy2 dye (Cat# 705-225-147, Jackson ImmunoResearch, PA, USA) was used for DTA detection. HiDef Detection HRP Polymer System (Cat# 954D-10, Cell Marque, CA, USA) was used for cleaved Cas-3, P53, Mad1, Smad3, E2F1 and Katushka detection. Pollnk-2 Plus HRP Detection Kit for Rat Primary Antibody (Cat# D46-6, GBI Labs, WA, USA) was used for F4/80 detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunoblotting Analysis of Cell Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting from cell lysates was performed as previously described (Papaspyropoulos et al., 2022 (link)). The following primary antibodies were used at a concentration of 1:1000; HES1 (AB5702), GAPDH (Cell Signaling #5174), SMAD3 (ThermoFisher #51–1500), pSMAD3 (Cell Signaling #9520), VEGF (Santa Cruz; sc‐507) and HRP‐linked anti‐rabbit secondary antibodies were used at a concentration of 1:1000 (Cell Signaling #7074).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibody Validation for EMT Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Information on antibodies used in this study is provided in Table S2. Snai1, Slug, E-cadherin and Vimentin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc (USA). Slug was purchased from Proteintech (Chicago, USA) and Snail was purchased from OriGene (Maryland, USA). SMAD3 and p-SMAD3 were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, USA). MiR-203 mimics, inhibitor and forward primers were purchased from RiboBio Co. (Guangzhou, China). Primers of EMT-related markers for qRT-PCR analysis were synthesized by Tsingke (Beijing, China). qRT-PCR primers used are listed in Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Interference and Immune Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NHDF or tHF cells seeded in 12 well plates were transfected with 40uM siRNAs (SMAD3 and IRF7; Thermo Fisher Scientific) or miRNA mimics (custom designed; IDT) per well using Lipofectamine RNAiMax (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 33ug/mL ISD90 (IDT) and 16.5ug/mL polyI:C (Invivogen) was transfected into cells using Lipofectamine 3000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from transfected or infected cells using the Trizol RNA isolation method. cDNA was prepared using 1000ng of total RNA and random hexamer primers. Samples were incubated at 16°C for 30 minutes, 42°C for 30 minutes and 85°C for 5 minutes. Real-time PCR (Taqman) was used to analyze cDNA levels in transfected or infected samples. An ABI StepOnePlus Real Time PCR machine was used with the following program for 40 cycles: 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for one minute. Relative expression was determined using the ΔΔCt method using 18S as the standard control. JunB, SERPINE, SMAD3, IFNA1, IFNB1, RSAD2, IRF7 and 18S primer/probe sets were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analyzing Cellular Signaling Pathways in HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After being transfected with miRNA or siRNA particles for 72 h, HUVECs were suspended in RIPA lysis buffer. BCA Protein Assay Kit was used to determine the protein concentration. The samples were boiled in 5 × sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer at 95-100°C for 5 min. A total of 10 µg of protein sample was loaded for SDS-PAGE separation and transferred to polyvinylidene uoride (PVDF) membranes. After blocking in 5% skimmed milk, membranes were blotted with primary antibodies against Akt (#4685S, CST, USA), phospho-Akt (Ser473) (#4060, CST, USA), p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (#4695S, CST, USA), phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (#4370, CST, USA), Smad2 (5339S, Thermo Fisher, USA), phosphor-Smad2 (3108S), phospho-Smad3 (9520S, Thermo Fisher, USA), and Smad3 (9523S, Thermo Fisher, USA), β-Actin (SC-8432, Santa Cruz, USA) with a range of dilution factor from 1:500 to 1:2000 overnight at 4°C. After washing, membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 1 h. An enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Solarbio, China) was used for detection on the Bio-Rad Chemiluminescence imaging system. Gray values were calculated using Image J software (NIH, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!