The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using white opaque 96 well microplate

1

Frataxin-Luciferase Protein Expression Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For assessment of frataxin–luciferase protein expression, the cells were washed with PBS and lysed directly on the plate on ice using the cell culture lysis reagent from the luciferase assay system (Promega, catalog no. E1500). Lysates were transferred to microcentrifuge tubes, vortexed for 15 s, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 s. The supernatant was decanted into a microcentrifuge tube, and 25 μl was loaded in a white opaque 96-well microplate (PerkinElmer). Luciferase expression was determined by measuring luminescence with a PHERAstar FSX microplate reader (BMG LABTECH) equipped with injector pumps, where the injection of 100 μl of luciferase assay reagent was loaded to each sample before measurement. The data were normalized to total protein concentration as determined by BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring ROS and NO in Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure ROS formation by luminol based chemiluminescence assay, bone marrow neutrophils were incubated in X-vivo (Lonza) medium in a white opaque 96-well plate (White Opaque 96-well Microplate, PerkinElmer) and exposed to L. mexicana. 20 μg/ml of luminol (Carbosynth) was added to the cells and ROS chemiluminescence was measured over time at all wavelengths using a plate reader (molecular devices, SpectraMax). To measure ROS and NO by flow cytometry, ear cells were incubated with 1.2 μM DHR123 molecular probe (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or 1 μM DAF-FM probe (Invitrogen), respectively for 45 min at 37°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Cellular Glutathione Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular glutathione (GSH) levels were detected using the luminescence-based GSH-Glo Glutathione Assay (Promega), according to the manufacturers protocol. The assay is based on the conversion of a luciferin derivative into luciferin in the presence of glutathione, catalyzed by glutathione S-transferase (GST). Briefly, 5000 A375-GUS, A375-hCYGB, G361-shCTR, and G361-shCYGB cells were seeded out in a white opaque 96-well microplate (PerkinElmer). The next day, cells were either untreated, treated with 1 mM NAC only, or pre-treated with 1 mM NAC 1 h before pPBS treatment. After 6 h, luminescence was measured using the Spark Cyto (Tecan). GSH concentrations were calculated using a GSH standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Luciferase Assay for Promoter Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Luciferase activities were measured using the Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega). At 48 h post-transfection, medium was removed and cells were lysed using 50 μL of luciferase reagent diluted with 50 μL of PBS. After a 10-min shaking incubation, 90 μL of cell lysate from each well was transferred to a White Opaque 96-well microplate (PerkinElmer). Firefly luminescence was measured at 25 °C on a DTX880 Multimode Detector (Beckman Coulter) (MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-231 cells), or CLARIOstar (BMG LABTECH) (BT549 cells). Renilla luminescence was measured for each well 10 min after adding 45 μL of Stop&Glo reagents.
The relative luciferase activity of each construct was calculated as the ratio of firefly: Renilla luminescence, averaged amongst the triplicates and normalised to the positive control.
For each gene, luciferase assays were replicated in three independent experiments. Relative luciferase activities were normalised to the mean wild-type activity across the replicates for each gene. Using R, the relative luciferase activities of TE-deleted constructs were compared against the wild-type with a one-tailed t-test assuming equal variances, to test our hypothesis that the deletions would reduce promoter activities. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ATP Quantification of TGF-β1 Exposed Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sorted APCs were seeded in 96-well plates at 5 × 104 cells per well in 200 μl of growth media. Following overnight incubation, the cells were exposed to a concentration of 10 ng/ml of TGF-β1, along with fresh growth medium, for a duration of 72 h. To initiate the assays, the growth medium was carefully removed from each well and replaced with 100 μl of PBS. Subsequently, 50 μl of mammalian cell lysis solution was added to lyse the cells, and the resulting cell lysate was transferred to a White Opaque 96-well Microplate (Perkin Elmer, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France) in preparation for the ATP assay. The intracellular ATP content was quantified using the ATP-lite assay kit (Perkin Elmer, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France). Luminescence intensity emanating from each well was measured using a FLUOstar Optima plate reader (BMG Labtech, Offenberg, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measurement of CD38 Enzymatic Activities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Daudi cells in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) were seeded in a white opaque 96-well microplate (PerkinElmer), and incubated with HexaBody-CD38 for 15–20 min. Then, the NAD+ analog NGD+ was added and the conversion to fluorescent cGDPR was measured on an EnVision Plate Reader (PerkinElmer) as a measure of CD38 cyclase activity.18 (link) To evaluate CD38 hydrolase activity, the NAD+ analog ε-NAD+ was added and the conversion to fluorescent ε-ADPR was measured by fluorescence spectroscopy.19 (link) CD38 cyclase and hydrolase activity was calculated by determining the slope (arbitrary fluorescence units/min) of the linear part of the cGDPR or ε-ADPR production curve using linear regression analysis (GraphPad Prism software).19 (link) CD38 cyclase and hydrolase activity was calculated by determining the slope (arbitrary fluorescence units/min) of the linear part of the cGDPR or ε-ADPR production curve using linear regression analysis (GraphPad Prism software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Frataxin-Luciferase Protein Expression Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For assessment of frataxin-luciferase protein expression, cells were washed with PBS and lysed directly on the plate on ice using the Cell Culture Lysis Reagent from the Luciferase Assay System (Promega#E1500). Lysates were transferred to microcentrifuge tubes, vortexed for 15 sec and centrifuged at 12.000 x g for 15 sec. The supernatant was decanted into a microcentrifuge tube and 25 µl was loaded in a white opaque 96-well microplate (PerkinElmer). Luciferase expression was determined by measuring luminescence with a PHERAstar FSX microplate reader (BMG LABTECH) equipped with injectors pumps, where the injection of 100 µl of Luciferase Assay Reagent was loaded to each sample before measurement. Data were normalized to total protein concentration as determined by BCA protein assay (ThermoFisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of GPCR Phosphorylation Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coelenterazine was purchased from Carbosynth. Linear polyethylenimine (PEI, 25 kDa) was supplied by Polyscience. FuGENE® HD Transfection Reagent, furimazine (NanoGlo®), HaloTag® NanoBRET™ 618 ligand and T4 DNA ligase were from Promega. Phosphosite-specific antibodies pS355/pS356-β2 (Cat. no.: 7TM0029A) and pT360/pS364-β2 (Cat. no.: 7TM0029B) were from 7TM Antibodies, and the antibody against pS261 (Cat. no.: PA5-12977) was from Invitrogen. Anti-HA-tag antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS), Dulbecco’s modified Eagles’s medium (DMEM), Lipofectamin 2000, HA-beads, TetraSpeck fluorescent beads, 96-well white polystyrene LumiNunc microplates, all antibiotics and pertussis toxin (PTX) were from Thermo Fisher. The HTRF cAMP accumulation kit and the DERET substrate, SNAP-Lumi4-Tb, were purchased from Cisbio. SNAP-Surface Alexa Flour 488, SNAP-Surface Alexa Flour 549, SNAP-Surface Alexa Flour 649, Q5® High-Fidelity polymerase, NotI-HF®, ApaI, anti-SNAP-tag antibody (Cat. no.: P9310S) were obtained from New England Biolabs (NEB). Effectene was from Qiagen. All other chemicals and compounds were from Sigma Aldrich. TopSeal-A PLUS, Dihydroalprenolol Hydrochloride ([3H]-DHA, 250µCi, 9.25MBq), WGA PVT 500 MG SPA Beads, and OptiPlate-96, and White Opaque 96-well Microplates were from Perkin Elmer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HEK293T Cell Transfection and HiBiT Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells were seeded into clear 24‐well plates (Costar) at a density of 200 000 cells/well and the following day were transfected with receptor DNA using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen). Twenty‐four hours after transfection, cells were resuspended and seeded into white, opaque 96‐well microplates (Perkin Elmer) at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well for assay the following day. On the day of the experiment, cell culture media was aspirated from all wells and replaced with 100 µL of PRF‐DMEM and placed back in the 37°C incubator for 1 hour before further addition of 100 µL HiBiT complementation reagent and subsequent luminescence measurements in a Polarstar Omega platereader (BMG Labtech). HiBiT complementation reagent was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions using the Nano‐Glo ® HiBiT Extracellular Detection system kit (Promega) and contained a final concentration of 200 nmol/L LgBiT protein. To permeablize cells and label intracellular HiBiT tags for measurement of total expression, digitonin (Sigma) was added to the HiBiT complementation reagent to achieve a final concentration of 0.01%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Luciferase Assay for GH3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1.5 × 104 GH3 cells per well were seeded into white opaque 96-well microplates (PerkinElmer), serum starved for 24 hours in media containing 1mM luciferin, then stimulated in triplicate as indicated. Microplates were covered with Breathe-Easy sealing membranes (Sigma) and Luc activity of wells measured using a FLUOstar Omega (BMG Labtech) over a 24-hour period with cells maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2-95% air. Photon counts for each well were integrated over 5 seconds and repeated every 15 minutes. Results are shown as mean fold induction relative to an unstimulated control ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments. For statistical analysis, P values were calculated using Student's t test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!