The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using whatman no 2

1

Radiolabeling of DOTA-Rituximab Immunoconjugate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Typically, 510 MBq of 111InCl3 solution in 0.2 M HCl in conical vials were dried under a flow of nitrogen and residues were dissolved in 1500 μl of ammonium acetate buffer (pH = 5.5). 500 μl aliquots of ammonium acetate buffer were added to the vials containing lyophilized immunoconjugates (three different DOTA: antibody ratios) and the vials were mixed using pipetting up and down (10-20×) to dissolve immunoconjugates. Then 500 μl (170 MBq) aliquots of 111In solution were added to vials and after mixing gently for 5 min by up and down pipetting, mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1–2 h.
The radiochemical purity of the products was determined by ITLC on Whatman No.2, using 10 mM DTPA as mobile phase and HPLC on a C-18 column using a gradient system as a reported routine method in this laboratory
[27 ]. To increase the radiochemical purity, the radioimmunoconjugates were purified by chromatography using PD-10 columns (GE healthcare) and ammonium acetate buffer (pH = 7.0) as eluting solvent. The final solutions were then passed through 0.22 micron biological filters for stability and biodistribution studies. Radiolabeling of the immunoconjugates with 90Y and quality control of the resulting radioimmunoconjugate were carried out by the same method which was described for the preparation and quality control of 111In-DOTA-rituximab.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction of Pinus Needle Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh P. densiflora and P. koraiensis needles were rinsed with distilled water. After removing moisture, the needles were dried in a heat dry machine (KED-066A, C&T Co., Gwangju, Korea) at 30 °C for seven days or 90 °C for three days without light. Then, dried samples were coarsely ground using a commercial grinder and passed through a 100-mesh sieve. Subsequently, the resulting powder (10 g) from each sample was dissolved in 200 mL of 80% aqueous methanol (v/v) and agitated using a shaker (Daewonsci Inc., Bucheon, Korea) at 20 °C for 24 h. Next, the solution was filtered through qualitative filter papers (Whatman No. 2, Maidstone, UK). Finally, the solvent was removed using a vacuum rotary evaporator (Eyela, Tokyo, Japan). To remove residual solvent, the extracts were dried using a freeze dryer (IlShinBioBase Inc., Dongducheon, Korea) and maintained at 15 °C until use for non-volatile assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phenolic Extraction from Lyophilized Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the extraction of phenolic compounds, each lyophilized leaf sample was powered and sieved using a 900 μm sieve. The extraction was performed as previously described by Vinha et al. (2002) (link). Briefly, about 1.5 g of the powdered leaf samples were weighed in quadruplicates. Each sample was separately mixed with 50 mL of methanol (99.96%, Aldrich) at 150 rpm for 1 h (room temperature). The obtained methanolic extracts were filtered through a Whatman No.4 paper and evaporated (Stuart RE3000, UK) to dryness under reduced pressure (35°C). After dissolution in 2 ml methanol (99.96%, Aldrich) and filtration (Whatman No. 2), an aliquot of 20 μl of the obtained extracts was analyzed by HPLC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microalgae Extraction and Bioactivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mychonastes sp. 246 cells were harvested using Whatman No. 1 filter paper to prepare ME. The filtered cells were washed thrice with distilled water to remove residual ions and cell debris. For freeze-drying, wet biomass was frozen overnight at −80°C and lyophilized using a freeze dryer (FD8512, IlShinBioBase, Korea). Methanol (99.5%, Daejung, Korea) was added to the dry cells (5 g), followed by sonication using a sonicator (Powersonic 410, Hwashin Tech, Korea) for 20 min. The extract was allowed to react at room temperature for 1 day and then filtered (Whatman No. 2, Whatman International, UK). The extract was concentrated using a rotary evaporator (N-2110; Eyela, Japan), and different concentrations (0, 1, 5, 10, and 20 μg/ml) of the extract were prepared using dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Extraction and Isolation of I. verum Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
I. verum fruits were dried in an oven (GRX–9071B; Yiheng Scientific Instruments Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 40°C for 2 d, ground into powder by using an electric grinding mill (DD–120B; Linda Machinery Co. Ltd., Zhejiang, China), and sifted through a 40 mesh sieve. The dry powder (150 g) was placed into a 1.0 liter round-bottomed flask. Methyl alcohol (MA; polarity, 5.1; highly polar), ethyl acetate (EA; polarity, 4.4; weakly polar), and petroleum ether (PE; boiling point range, 60–90°C; polarity, 0.0; nonpolar) were sequentially added at a ratio of 1:5 (w/v) at room temperature (25°C). The mixture was incubated in the dark for 48 h and then filtered (Whatman No. 2, Whatman Inc., Clifton, NJ, USA). The samples were leached twice via the above same procedure. The final filtrates were collected from each solvent to obtain the crude extracts. The combined filtrate was dried and concentrated using a vacuum rotary evaporator (Buchi rotavapor R–124; Flawil, Switzerland) then weighed using an electronic balance (FA2104; Hangping Co., Shanghai, China). All samples were stored in air-tight brown bottles at 4°C in a refrigerator until needed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Formol Method for Determining Amino Nitrogen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AN content of the samples was measured via the formol method [17 (link)]. Briefly, we placed 5 g of sample in a beaker containing 100 mL of distilled water, stirred it for 1 h for sufficient dissolution, and filtered it through filter paper (Whatman No. 2, Whatman International, Maidstone, UK). The filtrate was adjusted to 100 mL with distilled water, and 20 mL of this solution was collected. After titrating with 0.1 N NaOH to adjust the pH to 8.4, we added 20 mL of neutral formalin solution. Blank tests were performed using distilled water, and AN was calculated using the following equation: where a is the amount of 0.1 N NaOH in the main test (mL), b is the amount of 0.1 N NaOH in the blank test (mL), f is the titer of 0.1 N NaOH, d represents the dilution (5 in this test), and S stands for the sample weight (g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesizing Chitosan-Maltodextrin Nanoparticles with Liquid Smoke

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Each concentration of liquid smoke of rice husk (1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5%) was made as nanoparticles with chitosan and maltodextrin. Chitosan (1.5% w/v) and maltodextrin (8.5% w/v) are dispersed in a solution of glacial acetic acid water (1.0% v/v). The chitosan–maltodextrin nanoparticles are made by complexation of chitosan polyelectrolyte with maltodextrin and additional chitosan ionic glass with sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) anion. Chitosan and maltodextrin are dissolved in liquid smoke rice husks. Sodium TPP (1.0 mg/mL) is added to the mixture and stirred using a magnetic stirrer at 200 rpm for 30 minutes at room temperature. The nanoparticles are isolated by centrifugation at a speed of 3,000 rpm in a 50 mL cone tube for 30 minutes at room temperature. Supernatants is discarded and nanoparticles filtered in a vacuum using Whatman no. 2. The nanoparticle solution is heated at 50°C into a water bath for 15 minutes and homogenized using a speed rotor–stator homogenizer at 5,200 rpm for 2.5 minutes.
17
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extracting Functional Compounds from Bee Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare ethanol extracts, 10% (w/v) of bee larva, pupa and adult lyophilized powders was dissolved in 95% ethanol by powder weight (Daejung Chemicals & Metals Co., Ltd., Siheung, Korea) and extracted three times at room temperature. After that, the extract was paper-filtered (Whatman No. 2) and concentrated under reduced pressure (Eyela Rotary evaporator, N-1000, Tokyo Rikakikai Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). A freeze dryer (FD5508, Ilshin Lab Co. Ltd, Dongduchun, Korea) was used to prepare the powder. Extracted samples were dissolved in DMSO at a suitable concentration, for functional component analysis. Functional analyses were restricted only to Buckfast drone because of the limited accessibility. We therefore carried out the examination of functional properties.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Extraction and Characterization of Dryopteris morbiferus Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried D. morbiferus leaves were supplied by JEJUPANATEK (JEJUPANATEK Inc., Jeju, Republic of Korea). Ground D. morbiferus leaves (50 g) were added to 70% ethanol (500 mL, w:v = 1:10), followed by reflux extraction at 80 °C for 2 h. After repeating the extraction process once, the extract was filtered (Whatman No. 2, Whatman plc, Kent, UK) and concentrated under reduced pressure (R-100, BUCHI Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland). Extracts were lyophilized (FDTE-8012, Operon, Gimpo, Republic of Korea) and stored at −18 °C until further processing. The yield of the extract to the original mass was 24%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Eucommia ulmoides Bark Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dried stem bark of Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. was purchased from the Kyung-Dong Oriental Medicine Market (Seoul, Republic of Korea). The stem bark of EU had been collected in Andong, Republic of Korea in June 2008 and was identified by Professor Sun Yeou Kim (College of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea). A voucher specimen (KSYHP-EC-002-ET) was deposited at the herbarium of the Graduate School of East-West Medical Science, Kyung Hee University. The dried EU bark was cut into small pieces and extracted in hot water (70°C) three times using a reflux apparatus with a cooling system (40°C) for 1 h, and the resultant aqueous extract was passed through filter paper (Whatman, No. 2, Florham Park, NJ, USA). The supernatants were concentrated under reduced pressure with a vacuum rotary evaporator (EYELA, N-1000, Tokyo, Japan) and then lyophilized. Finally, the supernatant (100 g) was extracted with ethyl acetate three times for 1 h in an ultrasonic apparatus. The supernatant was evaporated and spray-dried, thus yielding 5 g of EUE that was stored at −20°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Whatman no 2 »