The following antibodies were used for immunofluorescence staining: rat anti‐mouse F4.80 (1:250; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rat anti‐Gr‐1 (1:250; eBioscience, Villebon‐sur‐Yvette, France), rat anti‐CD3 (1:250; Biolegend, Paris, France), and rat anti‐mouse CD31 (1:200; BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France), rabbit anti‐K14 (1:500; Biolegend). The sections were afterwards counterstained with 4,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole 0.3 μg·ml−1 (Sigma‐Aldrich, Saint‐Quentin‐Fallavier, France). Flow cytometry analysis was performed using PE/Cy7‐conjugated rat anti‐F4/80 (1:200, eBioscience), FITC‐conjugated rat anti‐CD31 (1:100, Biolegend), APC‐conjugated rat anti‐CD45 (1:1000; BD Bioscience), APC/Cy7‐conjugated rat anti CD11b (1:100; Biolegend), PE‐conjugated rat anti‐Ly6C (1:100, Biolegend), and FITC‐conjugated rat anti‐CD206 (1:100; Biolegend). The immuno‐related procedures used comply with the recommendations made by the British Journal of Pharmacology (Alexander et al., 2018 (link)).
Rat anti gr 1
The Rat anti‐Gr‐1 is a laboratory reagent used for the identification and analysis of myeloid cells expressing the Gr‐1 antigen. The Gr‐1 antigen is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol‐anchored protein found on the surface of granulocytes, including neutrophils, eosinophils, and myeloid‐derived suppressor cells. The Rat anti‐Gr‐1 antibody can be used in various applications, such as flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting, to detect and study the Gr‐1‐positive cell populations.
Lab products found in correlation
3 protocols using rat anti gr 1
Clobetasol-Induced Skin Atrophy Protocol
The following antibodies were used for immunofluorescence staining: rat anti‐mouse F4.80 (1:250; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rat anti‐Gr‐1 (1:250; eBioscience, Villebon‐sur‐Yvette, France), rat anti‐CD3 (1:250; Biolegend, Paris, France), and rat anti‐mouse CD31 (1:200; BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France), rabbit anti‐K14 (1:500; Biolegend). The sections were afterwards counterstained with 4,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole 0.3 μg·ml−1 (Sigma‐Aldrich, Saint‐Quentin‐Fallavier, France). Flow cytometry analysis was performed using PE/Cy7‐conjugated rat anti‐F4/80 (1:200, eBioscience), FITC‐conjugated rat anti‐CD31 (1:100, Biolegend), APC‐conjugated rat anti‐CD45 (1:1000; BD Bioscience), APC/Cy7‐conjugated rat anti CD11b (1:100; Biolegend), PE‐conjugated rat anti‐Ly6C (1:100, Biolegend), and FITC‐conjugated rat anti‐CD206 (1:100; Biolegend). The immuno‐related procedures used comply with the recommendations made by the British Journal of Pharmacology (Alexander et al., 2018 (link)).
Immunohistochemical Analysis of EPRAP and Associated Pathways
For immunohistochemistry of human samples, paraffin-embedded sections were stained with rat anti-CD68 (Abcam), goat anti-FEM1A (Abcam), and rabbit anti–phospho-NF-κB p105 (Ser933), rabbit anti–phospho-MEK1/2 (Ser221), or rabbit anti–phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) antibodies. Staining with non-immune rat or rabbit IgG served as a negative control for each experiment.
Immunofluorescence Staining of Murine Tissues
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!