The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lava plus

Manufactured by 3M
Sourced in Germany, United States

Lava Plus is a versatile laboratory equipment designed for a variety of scientific applications. It provides a controlled and consistent heat source for various experimental processes. The core function of Lava Plus is to generate and maintain precise temperatures required for specific laboratory tasks.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using lava plus

1

Characterization of Sintered Zirconia Ceramics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight commercial pre-sintered zirconia ceramics (Table 1: GC ST, GC HT and GC UHT, GC, Tokyo, Japan;
Katana HT, Katana ML, Katana STML and Katana UTML, Kuraray Noritake, Tokyo, Japan; Lava Plus, 3M
Oral Care, Seefeld, Germany) were cut into dimensions of approximate by 15 × 15 × 3.5 mm, 18 × 18 × 3.5 mm or 12 × 12 × 3.5 mm, depending on the thickness of the pre-sintered ceramic blank provided by the suppliers. All specimens were cut through whole ceramic pre-sintered disk in order to include all the layers in the analysis. Specimens were pressureless sintered in air according to the manufacturers' instructions (Table 1) using a computer-programmed furnace (Nabertherm, Lilienthal, Germany) reaching the final specimen dimensions of (1) ≈10 × 10 × 1.2 mm for GC ST and GC HT; (2) ≈12 x 12 x 1.2 mm for Katana HT, Katana ML, Katana STML, Katana UTML and Lava HT; (3) ≈15 × 15 ×
1.2 mm for GC UHT. The sintered materials were ground plane parallel and gradually polished down to 1 µm with diamond suspensions and finally with colloidal silica until a mirror-glass surface was achieved. The final specimen thickness was 0.5 ± 0.05 mm for evaluating the microstructure and optical properties and 1.2 ± 0.05 mm for analyzing the biaxial flexural strength.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Zirconia Multilayer Firing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dental zirconia blocks (Lava Plus, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were cut and finished by a low-speed diamond disc (MD-Piano, Struers, Ballerup, Denmark). They were then sintered, up to 1450 °C, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The specimens were randomly distributed into seven experimental groups: F0 (control; sintering only), F1 (first additive firing (ZirLiner; zirconia lining material)), F2 (second additive firing (Margin)), F3 (third additive firing (Wash)), F4 (fourth additive firing (Dentin and Enamel)), F5 (fifth additive firing (Stain)), and F6 (sixth additive firing (Glazing)); n = 7 each. Except for F0, which only went through sintering, the additive firing was performed for F1–F6 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Figure 1). They were embedded in an epoxy resin (Cold Mounting Systems Epoxy Systems, Metallurgical Supplies, Buffalo, NY, USA) and went through final finishing and polishing up to 0.06 μm abrasive (LaboPol-5, Struers, Ballerup, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Zirconia Coping Fabrication on Standardized Abutments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three standardized stainless steel abutments [35 (link),36 (link),37 (link)] were designed in the shape of truncated cones on the basis of the average dimensions of a maxillary premolar with a height of 7 mm and a diameter of 8 mm [38 ] using a dedicated CAD software (Exocad, DentalCAD, Exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Three different finish lines were used: Deep-chamfer (depth of 1 mm), slight-chamfer (depth of 0.5 mm), and feather-edge (no depth). All masters were designed and milled with a total occlusal convergence of 10 degrees [39 (link)] (Figure 2). Then, the abutments were physically fabricated using CAM technology by milling stainless steel cylinders in the designed shapes.
Three zirconia available on the market were selected: NobelProcera Zirconia, (Nobel Biocare Management AG, Zürich-Flughafen, English Switzerland), Lava Classic (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), and Lava Plus (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Thirty zirconia copings for each material were prepared with a deep-chamfer, slight-chamfer, or feather-edge finish line (n = 10 per group). All copings had a thickness of 0.6 mm [40 (link)]. Groups and compositions are listed in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Evaluation of Dental Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HACs (N = 80) were fabricated from eight different monolithic restorative materials, resulting in 10 specimens per test group (n = 10): 1) 3Y-TZP zirconia (ZY3: 3M LAVA Plus, 3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany), 2) "Gradient Technology" zirconia (ZY35: IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein), 3) 5Y-TZP zirconia (ZY5: 3M LAVA Esthetic, 3M Espe), 4) LDS (IPS e.max CAD CEREC, Ivoclar Vivadent AG), 5) zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS: Celtra Duo, Dentsply Sirona Inc., York, PA, USA), 6) polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (MHY: VITA Enamic, VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany), 7) PMA (Telio CAD CEREC, Ivoclar Vivadent AG), and 8) 3Dprinted hybrid composite (PHC: VarseoSmile Crown Plus , BEGO, Bremen, Germany) (Fig. 2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fabrication and Characterization of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Ceramics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nine discs of Y-TZP, including three common commercial brands, namely, Lava™ Plus (block #LOT 636535, 3 M™ ESPE™, Deutschland GmbH Co., Neuss, Germany), VITA YZ® HT (block #LOT 57200, VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany), and NexxZr T (block #LOT WETCS, Sagemax Bioceramics Co., Washington, USA) were fabricated following the manufacturers’ instructions. Three additional lithium disilicate glass-ceramic discs (e.max CAD®, block #LOT S12302, Ivoclar Vivadent AG Co., Schaan, Principality of Liechtenstein) were prepared as a control group.
All green pieces before sintering were fabricated using a dental mill CAD/CAM machine (ARDENTA CNC MILL, CS100-5 A, ARIX Co., Tainan, Taiwan) to prepare pre-sintered porcelain blocks, which were then sintered by a ceramic furnace (VITA VACUMAT® 6000 M, VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. The sintered specimen was gradually polished with water sandpaper from #600 to #2000. All specimens were unglazed, and surfaces were cleaned with 70% alcohol after polishing with an ultrasonic cleaner (DC200H, Delta Ultrasonic Co., New Taipei City, Taiwan). The standard dimension of all samples was 12 mm × 12 mm x .5 mm (length x width x thickness) and verified to ensure that all thickness deviations were within 1%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Additively Manufactured Zirconia Ceramics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A summary of the characteristics and properties of the ceramics investigated is provided in Table 1, including two additively manufactured 3Y-TZPs (LithaCon 3Y 230, Lithoz, Vienna, Austria; 3D Mix zirconia, 3DCeram Sinto, Limoges, France), one additively manufactured ATZ (3D Mix ATZ, 3DCeram Sinto, Limoges, France) and one subtractive manufactured zirconia (LAVA Plus, 3M Oral Care, Seefeld, Germany). All specimens were prepared by the manufacturers in square shape with a dimension of 12 mm × 12 mm × 1.2 mm. The building direction of the specimens was 90° for LithaCon 3Y 230 (Lithoz) and 0° for 3D Mix zirconia and 3D Mix ATZ (3DCeram Sinto), as shown in Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Preparing Y-TZP Specimens for Bonding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixty cuboidal Y-TZP specimens in 15 (width) × 15 (height) × 3 (thickness) mm were prepared from a green-stage block (LAVA Plus, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and then the specimens were sintered according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Each Y-TZP specimen was embedded in polyester resin (EC-304, Aekyung, Seoul, Korea) and its bonding surface was polished with a diamond disc of 500 grit (MD-Piano, Struers, Ballerup, Denmark) under constant water cooling. The samples were immersed in a distilled water with ultrasonic vibration and dried. The surface of Y-TZP was sandblasted with 50 µm alumina (SandStorm Expert, Vaniman, Fallbrook, CA, USA) at a distance of 20 mm and a pressure of 0.4 MPa in the vertical direction for 20 s. The sandblasted Y-TZP were immersed in a distilled water with ultrasonic vibration for 2 min and dried.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluation of Dental Crown Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred and twenty monolithic crowns were made with varying thicknesses. Fifty crowns were made from low-translucent Y-TZP (LTZ) (Lava Zirconia, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany), 50 crowns from high-translucent Y-TZP (HTZ) (Lava Plus, 3M ESPE) and 20 crowns from lithium-disilicate glass ceramic (LDS) (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Standardized Master Dies for Zirconia FPDs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty standardized master dies, with two abutments and a base were prepared and machined in stainless steel (316L UNS S3 Alloy, Masteel, Birmingham, UK) in the Physical Science Faculty (University Complutense of Madrid, Spain) (Fig. 1). The abutments (n=40) were designed with 5 mm in height, a occlusal diameter of 5 mm, a 1-mm-wide chamfer circumferentially finish line, a 6º angle of convergence of the axial walls, and rounded angles, simulating clinical conditions. The abutments were randomly positioned and screwed in pairs on the metallic bases to receive posterior 3-unit FDPs, so that one of them simulated a first mandibular premolar and the other a first mandibular molar.
The master dies were randomly divided into two groups (n=10 each, according to the results of power analysis) categorized according to the zirconia system used to fabricate the FDPs: Group 1 (ZV): Lava Zirconia (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and Group 2 (ZM): Lava Plus (3M ESPE). The specimens were used as working dies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Surface Treatments of Y-TZP Dental Ceramics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The schematic setup of the experiment is in Figure 1. Pre-sintered blocks of three Y-TZP dental ceramics: Lava Frame (LF) and Lava Plus (LP), (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and IPS ZirCad (IZ), (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) were sectioned using a diamond disk (Isomet 1000; Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) in order to produce 20 plates (10 mm x 10 mm x 2 mm) for each ceramic. After sinterization according to each manufacturer's instructions, the plates were ultrasonicated in distilled water for 5 min, polished with 600-, 1200-and 4000-grit SiC abrasive paper (DPU-10; Struers, Ballerup, Denmark). The plates were randomly divided into four groups (n=5) according to the following surface treatments: AS: assintered surface; 30: air-abrasion with 30 mm Si-coated Al 2 O 3 particles (Rocatec Plus, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany); 50: air-abrasion with 50 mm Al 2 O 3 and 150: air-abrasion with 150 mm Al 2 O 3 particles. The three treatments were applied orthogonally to the ceramic surfaces at a pressure of 2.5 bar for 15 s at a 10 mm distance. After the treatments, the plates were ultrasonicated in distilled water for 5 min and air-dried in a glass desiccator containing freshly dried silica gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!