The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using u tv0.5xc 3

1

Histological Image Capture Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For inspecting and capturing images of the histological and immunohistochemical sections, an Olympus light microscopy (Olympus, Japan) was used. Slides were photo'd by using Olympus digital camera (U.TV0.5XC-3). Photos were saved as jpg and handled by Adobe Photoshop 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Emulsion Droplet Sizes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical microscope images
of the emulsion were obtained using a Bx41 optical microscope fitted
with an olympus camera adapter (U-TV0.5XC-3) system using a 5×
objective lens.
The average diameter of the droplets was determined
with ImageJ v1.47 by measuring the size of 10 droplets from the digital
micrographs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Liver Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed liver specimens were dehydrated, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Five micrometers thick liver slices were cut, stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin stain, and examined to study the pathological alterations [49 ] using an Olympus (U.TV0.5XC-3) light microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing GmPAP4 Expression in Soybean Nodules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To elucidate the expression pattern of GmPAP4 in soybean nodules, we cloned 2000 bp promoter sequences of GmPAP4 upstream of the translation start codon ATG, fused with β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene (pGmPAP4:GUS). The resulting construct was introduced into the soybean hairy roots by Agrobacterium rhizogenes K599 and the transgenic hairy roots were then inoculated with rhizobia Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110 for nodule development. After 4 weeks of rhizobia inoculation, transgenic hairy roots and nodules were stained as described previously and captured with a light microscope (Olympus U-TV0.5XC-3, Tokyo, Japan) [14 (link)]. For GUS activity, total nodule proteins were extracted and incubated in a mixture containing 10 mM 4-methylumbelliferyl β-D-glucuronide (MUG; Sigma Chemical Co., St.Louis, MO, USA) for 1 h at 37 °C. The fluorescence product of 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) was monitored using a VersaFluor™fluorometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with excitation at 365 nm and emission at 455 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Corneal Flatmount Angiogenesis Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Corneas were flattened with four cuts at 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions, into four quadrants. The corneas were mounted with mounting media (Immu-Mount; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Kalamazoo, MI, USA) on slides, and photographs were taken under an Olympus Microscope (BX43; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) attached to a digital camera (U-TV0.5XC-3; Olympus). The digital images of flat-mounted corneas were analyzed using the Olympus CellSens Standard 1.17 software (Olympus). The total area of the cornea was encircled by drawing a freehand region, including the innermost vessels of limbal arcade. The new vessel sprouts were connected using a freehand selection and then calculated. The total corneal area and the avascular area were quantified with the assistance of software. The percentages of NV area in the total cornea were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analyzing GmHSP17.9 Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis of the GmHSP17.9, a 2‐kb fragment upstream of ATG was cloned into the pBI121 vector to generate the pHSP::GUS construct. The construct was transformed into the Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain, K599, to obtain transgenic hairy roots which were screened by GUS staining. GUS staining was performed as described previously (Luo et al., 2013 (link); Zhong et al., 2013 (link)). Fresh root tips were incubated in 5‐bromo‐4‐chloro‐3‐indolyl‐b‐D‐glucuronic acid (X‐Gluc) containing solution at 37 °C for 12 h, washed with 70% ethanol, and examined under a microscope. After GUS staining, nodules were embedded and frozen, then sectioned transversely to a thickness of 25 µm with a microtome (CRYOSTARNX50). GUS activity was observed with a light microscope (OLYMPUS U‐TV0.5XC‐3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microstructure and Hardness Analysis of Heat-Treated Metal Matrix Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical microstructure (OM) analysis was done using OLYMPUS U-TV0.5XC-3 (BX53M). Using this reinforcement distribution and different phase formations, modifications that occurred in the heat-treated composites were identified. The hardness test was performed using a Micro Vickers Hardness tester, Model-MMTX7A, as per ASTM E384 standards [34 (link)]. During this test, the load was set at 200 gmf with a dwell time of 15 s. Five readings were taken for each sample, and the average hardness value was used in the graphs plotted along with the standard deviation. Hardness tests were carried out for as-cast (AC) samples and samples subjected to SSHT and MSHT, followed by artificial aging at 100 and 200 °C for different time intervals (0–16 h) until peak hardness was attained. A tensile test was performed only on AC and peak-aged (highest VHN value) samples of both the composites using an Electronic Tensometer, Model-PC-2000/605/06, as per ASTM E8 standards [33 (link)]. The load was maintained at 20 kN with a break test mode and speed of 1 mm/min. Fracture analysis for the broken tensile samples of both AC and peak-aged (highest VHN value) samples of both composites was performed using SEM, and the mode of fracture experienced by them was illustrated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In vitro Yolk Sac Vessel Formation from Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the potential formation of yolk sac vessels from stem cells, an in vitro test was performed using the BD Matrigel™ substrate (BD Biosciences, USA). As a positive control, bovine umbilical vein endothelial cells (BUVECs) cultured in vitro under the same conditions as those of bYS-MSCs. The Matrigel (BD Biosciences) was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The bYS-MSCs were plated at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells in EGM-2 medium (Gibco-BRL, USA) with 10% FCS on the Matrigel substrate (Covas et al., 2008). Samples were viewed under phase-contrast microscopy (Olympus IX71), and pictures were recorded using a digital camera (Olympus U-TV0.5XC-3) at 0 hour, 10 hours, 24 hours, 5 days, 10 days, and 15 days. The area was quantified using the ImageJ software (NIH Image-BioLab). We did the comparative analysis of the umbilical cord and bYS-MSCs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Cellular Proliferation Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient and control fibroblasts were plated onto coverslips in duplicates and grown to 50% confluency. One of the duplicates was incubated with 25 µM EdU for 48 h, to determine the fraction of cycling cells. The other duplicate was incubated with 0.5 mM HU (Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 h, after which the cells were washed with serum-free media to remove the HU, and then incubated with 50 µM EdU for 1 h. EdU incorporation was determined using the Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor 488 Imaging kit and staining with 5 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen). Images were produced using fluorescent microscopy (Olympus U-TV0.5XC-3). The percent of cells that incorporated EdU was measured by calculating the number of green nuclei (EdU) out of the total screened nuclei (>1,500; stained blue with Hoechst). The percentage of replicating cells after HU treatment was calculated by the fraction of EdU-positive cells after HU treatment divided by the fraction of EdU-positive cells after the 48-h incubation with EdU.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microscopic Analysis of Plant Meristems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microscopy analysis, whole buds and samples of bud scales, stipules, and young leaves were vacuum infiltrated with Karnovsky’s fixative (paraformaldehyde 4% and glutaraldehyde 5% in phosphate buffer 0.1 M, pH 7.2; modified from [62 ]) for 5 min and left to set for 24 h in the same solution. Soon after, they were dehydrated in an increasing ethanol series (10–98%) and embedded in (2-hidroxiethyl)-methacrylate (Historesin embedding kit, Leica, Heidelberg, Germany). Transverse and longitudinal sections of the entire apex and fragments of stipules, bud scales, and young leaves were obtained using a rotary microtome (Hyrax M40, Carl Zeiss Mikroskopie, Jena, Germany). The 5–6 µm thick sections were mounted on glass slides and stained with toluidine blue (0.5% in acetate buffer 0.1 M, pH 4.7; modified from [63 (link)]). Analysis and image capture were performed using a light microscope (CX41RF, Olympus Scientific Solutions, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to a digital camera (U-TV0.5XC-3, Olympus Scientific Solutions, Waltham, MA, USA) and a computer with an imaging software (LCmicro, Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!