The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Image arena 4

Manufactured by Tomtec
Sourced in Germany

Image Arena 4.6 is a software package for the capture, processing, and analysis of digital images. It provides a range of tools for image acquisition, enhancement, and quantification, catering to various applications in research and diagnostics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using image arena 4

1

Transthoracic Echocardiogram with 2D Speckle Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transthoracic echocardiogram including dedicated loops for myocardial deformation analyses by 2D speckle tracking was performed at all study visits by the same experienced cardiologist (S.N.) using a Vivid E9 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS Horten, Norway) and a standardized image protocol. Digital images were stored on Digital Versatile Discs and forwarded to the study core laboratory in Bergen, Norway for analyses using Tomtec workstations with Image Arena 4.6 software (Tomtec, Unterschleissheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Standardized Echocardiographic Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The echocardiography assessment was performed in the Oxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility Echocardiography Core Lab. A comprehensive transthoracic 2D echocardiography scan was performed for all participants at the baseline visit using Philips EPIC 7C or Philips iE33 echocardiography ultrasound machines (Philips Healthcare, Surrey, United Kingdom) and the xMATRIX array transducer (X5-1). All images were acquired according to the British Society of Echocardiography guidelines in image acquisition and optimization.23 (link) Image acquisition and interpretation were performed following the same standards and latest echocardiography guidelines in the three clinical studies. Conventional image analysis was completed offline following the latest guidelines for structural and functional cardiac assessment,24 (link) using Philips IntelliSpace Cardiovascular (ISCV) 2.1 (Philips Healthcare Informatics, Belfast, Ireland), and TomTec Image Arena 4.6 software (Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform 2D left ventricular and left atrial speckle tracking analysis following the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) recommendations.25 (link) Additional echocardiography scan was performed for TEPHRA participants in their follow-up visit after the 16-week exercise intervention.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for Atrial and Ventricular Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Speckle tracking echocardiography was performed to evaluate LA and LV myocardial function. The analysis was performed offline using commercially available software (TomTec software; Image Arena 4.6, Munich, Germany). LA strain was obtained from apical 4- and 2-chamber images by semi-automatic endocardial border tracking and manual adjustment to optimize tracking (15 (link)). Among the 3 phases of atrial strain (reservoir, conduit, and contractile), LA strain was calculated by averaging the reservoir from 4- and 2-chamber images (15 (link), 16 (link)). LV strain was obtained from acquired apical 4-chamber, apical 3-chamber, and apical 2-chamber views semi-automatically. LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated by averaging the peak strain value of 3 apical views (15 (link), 17 (link), 18 (link)). All data were performed and analyzed by two experienced individuals who were blinded to data analysis. To examine intra- and inter observer variability for LA and LV strain, two individuals repeated the analysis of the 20 consecutive patients. Since the amount of MR was diverse even in patients with significant MR, the ratio of MR volume to LA strain (MR volume/LA strain, ml/%) was used as a composite variable of MR severity and LA mechanical function.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Ventricular Mass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed with a S12‐4 transducer attached to a Phillips CX50 at birth and a Philips iE33 at 3 months of age. At each time point, a 2‐dimensional transthoracic echocardiography protocol that included acquisition of a 4‐chamber view optimized for the left ventricle (LV) was performed according to standard guidelines.17 Postnatal measures were performed in a temperature‐controlled room, with the infant at rest in a semirecumbent position at 45°, either in the arms of their mother, or a crib. To optimize images for postprocessing sector width, gains and depth were altered to maximize frame rate and multiple images were acquired for offline selection of highest quality loops. We used TomTec Image Arena 4.6 to create automated volumetric estimates of LV mass based on endocardial and epicardial borders defined in multiple 4‐chamber cine loops. An adaptation of the method was applied to the right ventricle (RV), as previously reported.18 Images were deemed analyzable if the endo‐ and epicardial border of the ventricle could be seen clearly in its entirety during the whole cardiac cycle. Detailed methods and our laboratory inter‐ and intraobserver variability for measures are described in Data S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for Cardiac Strain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Speckle tracking echocardiography was performed by an experienced cardiologist blinded to clinical data, using a vendor-independent software package (TomTec software; Image Arena 4.6, Munich, Germany). All echocardiograms were uploaded in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format to the software package. For myocardial deformation analysis, the endocardial border was traced on the end-systolic frame in each selected image. The end-systolic frame (≥ 50 frames per second) was defined by the QRS complex or based on the smallest ventricular volume during a cardiac cycle. The software automatically tracked speckles along the endocardial border and myocardium throughout the cardiac cycle. The myocardium of the right ventricle was divided into six segments (basal, mid, and apical segments) of the RV free wall and septum. For the assessment of RV strain, we evaluated the average value of the longitudinal peak systolic strain from all segments of the free and septal walls of the right ventricle (RV GLS) in the RV-focused apical view. For the assessment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS), the value for LV GLS was obtained by averaging all segmental strain values from the 18 LV segments in the apical four-, three-, and two-chamber views. The absolute value of RV GLS and LV GLS was expressed as |RV GLS| and |LV GLS|, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Echocardiographic Analysis of Cardiac Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Echocardiographic analysis of LV E/A and E/e′ ratios was completed using Philips IntelliSpace Cardiovascular 2.1 (Philips Healthcare Informatics) in accordance with standard guidelines (23 ). The E and A waves were calculated from the pulsed-wave Doppler with blood flow as the peak modal velocities in early and late diastole, respectively, at the leading edge of the spectral waveform, while e′ was calculated from the tissue Doppler imaging as the peak modal velocity in early diastole at the leading edge of the spectral waveform. Echocardiographic myocardial deformation was measured using Image Arena 4.6 (TomTec). LV longitudinal strain parameters were measured from apical 4-, 2-, and 3-chamber views and LV circumferential strain parameters from the midventricular short-axis view.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Echocardiographic Strain Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent echocardiographic evaluation with commercially available ultrasound systems. Readers performed the assessments in accordance with current guidelines and reviewed all echocardiographic measurements.12 (link),13 (link) These readers are highly trained and experienced, ensuring a high level of consistency and reproducibility in the measurements. To measure baseline left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS), two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed offline with vendor-independent software (Image Arena 4.6; TOMTEC Imaging Systems, Munich, Germany). The apical four-chamber, two-chamber, and long-axis views were captured for analysis, and the average of the estimated peak systolic strain values from each view was used to calculate GLS, reported as an absolute value according to the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations. A single observer, blinded to the clinical and other echocardiographic data and outcomes, performed all strain measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Echocardiographic Strain Analysis in HF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Echocardiography was performed following contemporary guidelines27 (link), and the details are described in Supplementary Methods. The median time interval between HF admission and echocardiography was 1 day (IQR, 0–2 days).
Echocardiography images were subsequently analyzed for strain measurement at the strain core laboratory. Briefly, images qualified for the strain analysis were uploaded to TomTec software (Image Arena 4.6, Munich, Germany) for deformation analysis. Speckles were automatically tracked frame by frame, aligning to the endocardial border of the myocardium, and LV-GLS was calculated as the averaged values from 3 apical views of the entire LV. All strain measurements were performed by independent observers blinded to participants’ clinical information. We used the absolute value of LV-GLS for a straightforward interpretation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cardiac MRI Biomarkers Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were evaluated by two radiologists (J.A.L. and A.I., with 8 and 3 years of experience in CMR, respectively) using dedicated software (IntelliSpace Portal Version 10.1, Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany). Ventricular and atrial volume and mass parameters were calculated according to recent guidelines and indexed to body surface area using the Mosteller method [19 (link)]. The presence of high signal intensities on T2 STIR and on LGE images was assessed visually by consensus agreement of the two readers. The semiquantitative T2 signal intensity ratio [20 (link)] and semiquantitative enhanced volume percentage (performed in short-axis LGE images) using the full-width half-maximum technique were calculated [19 (link)]. Myocardial relaxation maps were motion-corrected using FEIR (fast elastic image registration) software (IntelliSpace Portal Version 10.1, Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany). T1 and T2 relaxation times and hematocrit-corrected ECV values (using pre- and postcontrast T1 values) were calculated as previously described [20 (link)]. Dedicated software (Image-Arena 4.6, TomTec Imaging Systems, Unterschleißheim, Germany) was used to perform feature tracking strain measurements derived from cine images in four-chamber and short-axis views to assess LV global longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (GCS), and radial strain (GRS) [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Echocardiography Assessment of TAVR Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standardized transthoracic two‐dimensional, M‐mode, color‐flow Doppler echocardiography were performed on all patients during preoperative evaluation and again at 3‐month follow‐up according to major society guidelines. Specifically, each study measured LV end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), LV end systolic diameter (LVESD), intraventricular septal thickness, left atrial (LA) diameter, LV end diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end systolic volume (LVESV), LVEF and GLS. LVEF was assessed by the biplane method of disks. GLS was measured using a vendor‐independent software (TomTec, Image Arena 4.6) as described previously8 by an experienced operator. Primary outcomes were the absolute values and change in LVEF and GLS between baseline and follow‐up as an indicator for LV function. Secondary outcomes were clinically significant paravalvular leakage on echocardiography at 3‐month follow‐up, as well as long‐term AF and pacemaker insertion, Status of AF or pacemaker insertion for all patients was confirmed on 22nd August 2022.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!