The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using vertex 80 spectrometer

1

Biochar Characterization: Analytical Approach

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and nitrogen (N) contents of each biochar sample were determined using an Element Analyzer (Elementar Vario EL III, Frankfurt, Germany). The yield data of biochar were calculated based on mass balance. The ash was analyzed according to the approach reported by He et al.16 (link) and its weight percent calculated using the following equation: Ash(%)=WfWi×100 where Wf and Wi represent the final and initial mass of the biochar sample, respectively. The biochar samples’ oxygen (O) content was calculated on the basis of the mass balance assuming that whatever was not ash, C, H, and N had to be O17 (link): O%=100%Ash%C%H%N%
The surface area and pore properties of biochar were analyzed using a surface area and pore size analyzer (Micrometrics ASAP 2460, Norcross, USA). The surface structure and morphology of all biochar samples were observed with a FIELD Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan). The pHpzc (pH at point of zero charges) values of biochar samples were measured using a Zeta potential analyzer (Nano Brook Zeta Plus, Suffolk, USA). Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra (recorded using a Bruker Vertex 80 spectrometer, Karlsruhe, Germany) were collected in the 400–4000 cm−1 wavenumber range to identify the functional groups present on the surface of biochar samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Uniaxial Stretching and Electrical Characterization of PEDOT:PSS Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Uniaxial stretching tests were conducted on the PEDOT:PSS films using a micro tensile machine (MMT-500N, Shimadzu) equipped with an electrically contactable jig for in-situ resistance measurements. All the tests were conducted at room temperature at a constant strain rate of 5 × 10−5 s−1. As the films were deformed by uniaxial tension, the electrical resistance of the films was measured with an Agilent 34410A multimeter. The initial electrical conductivities of the films were measured using the four-point probe technique. Surface images of the PEDOT:PSS films were acquired using an optical microscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FE-SEM S-4800, Hitachi) at each strain. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) phase images were obtained with a NANO Station II instrument operating in non-contact tapping mode under ambient conditions. An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectrum was obtained using a PHI 5000 VersaProbeTM (ULVAC-PHI) with a monochromatized Al Kα, 1486.6 eV source. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy measurements were recorded on a Vertex 80 spectrometer (Bruker) in absorption mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Vibrational Circular Dichroism Measurements of Deuterated PLGA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for VCD measurements were obtained by dissolving freeze-dried deuterated β 2 -PLGA in d 6 -DMSO at approx. 37 mg/ml concentration. The reference sample of helical PLGA was obtained by dissolving sodium salt of PLGA at approx. the same concentration in 25 v/v % TFE in D 2 O and subsequent adjustment of pD to 4.3 using diluted DCl. At this pD value the overall helical content in aqueous PLGA remains high while the aggregation and precipitation of polypeptide is decelerated (VCD requires both high concentration of PLGA and relatively long acquisition times). Spectra were measured with 12 cm -1 spectral resolution and accumulated as the average of 4 scans using a homemade dispersive VCD instrument previously described in the literature 44 for samples in CaF 2 cells with 50 um Teflon spacer.
Baselines were partially corrected by subtraction of identically collected spectra of appropriate solvents. In parallel to VCD measurements, control infrared spectra (at 4 cm -1 resolution) were collected on the same samples with Bruker Vertex 80 spectrometer with a DTGS detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Step-Scan UV-Vis Spectroscopy of BINAP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Step-scan UV–vis spectroscopy: Step-scan UV–vis spectroscopy was performed using a Vertex 80 spectrometer (Bruker) with a Si diode detector. For samples containing pristine BINAP on quartz substrates was prepared using a chemical vapour deposition (CVD) technique. In this study, a third harmonic of a Nd:YAG laser (Continuum, Surelite) at 355 nm was used as the pump pulse, which has a duration of 15 ns and a repetition rate of 10 Hz. The background reduction and optimization of pumping power required various combinations of interference filters and were necessary to avoid thermal noise and sample decomposition. A typical excitation energy was adjusted to lower than 200 mJ·cm−2. An optimized laser pulse had a decent signal-to-noise ratio to avoid damaging the sample. Moreover, the excitation source was synchronized with the spectrometer and was set at an accurate 45° with respect to the UV–vis probe beam to maximize the pump–probe overlap. In addition, the visible source (tungsten lamp, 24 V, 150 W) was employed as an externally source coupled with a water cooling unit and power supply. During the measurement, the entire UV–vis compartment was purged with 2 bar nitrogen at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

FTIR Spectroscopy of Amyloid Fibrils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For FTIR spectroscopy, isolated fibrils or monomers were spotted onto a thin KBr pellet and were subjected to dry under an IR lamp. Then the spectrum was collected using a Bruker VERTEX 80 spectrometer attached with a DTGS detector at the frequency range of 1800–1500 cm–1, corresponding to amide I stretching frequency, with a resolution limit of 4 cm–1. The recorded spectrum was deconvoluted at the frequency range 1700–1600 cm–1, using Fourier Self Deconvolution (FSD) method and the deconvoluted spectrum was fitted using the Lorentzian curve fitting method using OPUS-65 software (Bruker, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Independent sets were performed thrice for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In Situ Transmission IR and HAADF-STEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in situ static transmission IR experiments were conducted in a home-built cell housed in the sample compartment of a Bruker Vertex 80 spectrometer, equipped with an MCT detector and operated at 4 cm−1 resolution. The powder sample was pressed onto a tungsten mesh which, in turn, was mounted onto a copper heating assembly attached to ceramic feedthrough. The sample could be resistively heated or cooled with liquid nitrogen, and the sample temperature was monitored by a thermocouple spot welded onto the top center of the W grid. The cold finger on the glass bulb containing CO was cooled with liquid nitrogen to eliminate any contamination originating from metal carbonyls, while NO was cleaned with multiple freeze–pump–thaw cycles. Prior to spectrum collection, a background with the activated (annealed, reduced, or oxidized) sample in the IR beam was collected. Each spectrum reported is obtained by averaging 64 scans.
HAADF-STEM was performed with an FEI Titan 80–300 microscope operated at 300 kV. The instrument is equipped with a CEOS GmbH double-hexapole aberration corrector for the probe-forming lens, which allows for imaging with 0.1 nm resolution in scanning transmission electron microscopy mode (STEM). The images were acquired with a high angle annular dark-field (HAADF) detector with an inner collection angle set to 52 mrad.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

FTIR Spectroscopy of Nematode Biochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We employed synchrotron-radiation-sourced FT-IR spectroscopy (SR-μFTIR)
to characterize the biochemical compositions of the untreated and
treated worms. Worms at the fully grown adult stage are more difficult
to penetrate by the incident rays. Therefore, to have a better intensity
of the FTIR spectra, ∼500 L3 stage worms are treated with the
substances in Milli-Q water for 16 h, washed by centrifugation, transferred
dropwise onto a 9 mm CaF2 window (∼45 worms per
window), and vacuum-dried. The SR-μFTIR analysis was conducted
at the MIRAS beamline at ALBA synchrotron, Spain using a Hyperion
3000 Microscope coupled to a Vertex 80 spectrometer (Bruker) equipped
with 36× magnification objective from 900–4000 cm–1. The spectra were collected in transmission mode
using an MCT detector at 4 cm–1 spectral resolution
and 8 × 8 μm2 aperture dimensions. Background
signal was scanned in each CaF2 window from an area free
of worms. FTIR spectra were extracted using OPUS 7.5 (Bruker), noise
removal, baseline correction, and application of Savitsky–Golay
second derivative were performed using Unscrambler and Origin 2019b.
Relative absorbance ratios were calculated from the second derivative
obtained from the FTIR spectral data. Four ratios, namely, lipid oxidation
(A1740/A2920), saturation (A2920/A2960), and unsaturation (A3012/A2920)
levels were evaluated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy of Protein Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The attenuated total reflection
infrared spectra (ATR-FTIR) were obtained by using a Bruker Vertex
80 spectrometer (Billerica, MA). A DTGS detector was used to acquire
data at 4 cm–1 resolution. The scans were 2 min
long for both sample and background and had a 5 kHz sampling rate.
The protein solutions were sampled at a 45° angle of incidence
by using a Pike Technologies VeeMax II ATR accessory with a 45°
ZnSe crystal (Madison, WI). For each of the tested protein solutions,
6 sample and 6 buffer scans were acquired relative to the empty crystal
and averaged to produce the spectra. Buffer subtraction, data manipulation,
and export were carried out with Bruker Opus 7.5 software. Spectral
derivatives were determined using Opus 7.5 after the spectra were
min-max normalized between 1720 and 1600 cm–1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Thermal and Structural Analysis of Complex 1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents are analytically pure grade in the experiment and are not further purified for use. Thermogravimetric analysis was measured on a NETZSCH STA 449 F5 Jupiter TGA analyzer (Selb, Germany) using an empty Al2O3 crucible as the standard. Measuring temperature ranges from 25 to 800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under N2 atmosphere. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of the title complex were obtained using a Shimadzu XRD-6000 X-ray diffractometer (Kyoto, Japan) with Cu-Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) radiation at room temperature and 2θ ranging from 5° to 50°. Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA) 240C elemental analyzer was used to obtain elemental analyses of complex 1. Infrared spectra were obtained on a Bruker VERTEX 80 spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA) in the 4000–400 cm−1 region. Fluorescence data were collected on the Perkin Elmer LS55 Fluorescence Spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

PLLA/PCL Hybrid Coating Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface gelatin coating of PLLA/PCL hybrid was investigated by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). IR spectra were obtained using Vertex 80 spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Germany) equipped with a DTGS detector and a diamond ATR crystal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!