The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Thomas model 4 wiley mill

Manufactured by Thomas Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Thomas Model 4 Wiley Mill is a laboratory equipment designed for the efficient size reduction of solid samples. It features a durable stainless steel construction and a high-speed rotating cutting blade that effectively grinds and pulverizes a wide range of materials into fine, homogeneous particles. The mill can accommodate sample sizes up to 500 grams and is suitable for use in various applications that require precise sample preparation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using thomas model 4 wiley mill

1

Digestibility Assessment of Gestating Swine Diets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromic oxide (0.25%) was added into each diet from day 104 to 112 of gestation as an inert indigestible indicator to measure the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients. Fecal samples were harvested from the floor during the last four days of gestation to measure the ATTD of DM; GE; CP; NDF; and ADF. The samples were mixed within the pen and dried in a forced-air drying oven at 60 °C for 72 h, and ground in a Wiley mill (Thomas Model 4 Wiley Mill, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) using a 1-mm screen and used for chemical analysis. Experimental diets and excreta samples were analyzed in triplicate for DM (Method 930.15), CP (Method 990.03), and ADF (Method 973.18) according to AOAC [50 ]. The gross energy of the diets and feces was measured by a bomb calorimeter (Model 1261, Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL), and chromium concentrations were determined with an automated spectrophotometer (Jasco V-650, Jasco Corp., Tokyo, Japan) according to the procedure of Fenton and Fenton [51 (link)]. This is an improved method for chromic oxide determination in feed and feces. The NDF was determined gravimetrically with exposure of samples to neutral detergent, amylase, and sodium sulfite, then filtration of samples on a 1.5-µm glass filter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation of Maguey Fiber Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The researchers manually harvested the maguey leaves. The leaves were then retted via natural water retting to obtain their fibers. The obtained raw maguey fibers were washed three times using distilled water to remove remaining impurities before actual experimental execution and then dried in direct sunlight for 8 h. The dried maguey fibers were cut into sections measuring 3–5 cm long and then oven-dried at 80 °C or until a moisture content of <10% was achieved. A moisture content of 5.34% was achieved, as shown in Section S.I.1 in the Supplementary Material. The maguey fibers were then cut into 2–2.5 mm length pieces as part of the preparation before being pulverized in Thomas Model 4 Wiley® Mill, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA, with a 1 mm screen plate. Maguey fibers were then sieved for 5 min using an ISO 3310-1 Laboratory Test Sieve, Endecotts Ltd., London, UK, sieve shaker with sieve sizes of 850, 450, 250, and 180 µm. The obtained mean particle size diameter was 582.6820 µm, as shown in Table S.I.2 in the Supplementary Material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sample Drying and Preparation for Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediately after collection, the samples were manually cleaned, separating the leaves and inflorescences. The samples were divided into two equal parts to be dried in an oven or by lyophilization. For the oven-drying procedure, the samples (leaves and inflorescences) were placed in a forced-ventilation oven (FX 1375, Shel Lab, Cornelius, OR, USA) at 40 °C for 48 h. For the lyophilization procedure, the samples were frozen at −80 °C for 24 h, and then placed in a freeze dryer (Scientz-10N, Ningbo Scientz Biotechnology Co., Zhejiang, China) at −60 °C and 1 Pa. Once dried, samples were ground in an electric blender (Thomas Model 4 Wiley Mill®, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) and sieved through a 500 µm mesh. The resulting powders were then placed in sealed bags and stored at −80 °C for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nutrient Digestibility and Growth Performance in Pigs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of each phase, pigs were weighed individually, and feed consumption was measured to calculate average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and gain to feed ratio (G:F). Fecal grab samples were collected during the last 4 d of each phase to determine the apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter (DM), gross energy (GE), crude protein (CP), and Zn. Pens were cleaned before the start of sample collection and the fecal samples were then pooled within the pen, dried in a forced air oven at 60°C for 72 h, and ground in a Wiley mill (Thomas Model 4 Wiley Mill, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) using a 1-mm screen for chemical analysis. Analysis for each sample was done in triplicate for DM (Method 930.15), CP (Method 990.03), ash (Method 942.05), Ca, and P (method 985.01; 16) according to the methods of AOAC [11 ]. The GE of diets and feces were measured using a bomb calorimeter (Model 1261, Parr Instrument Co., Molin, IL, USA), while Cr concentrations were determined [12 (link)] with an automated spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Digestibility Assessment of Poultry Feed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The excreta samples were collected to evaluate the digestibility of dry
matter (DM), crude protein (CP), and gross energy (GE) at the end of each
phase. At the last 6 days in each phase, 2 birds per replicate were
transferred to individual cages (two bird/cage) for excreta samples
collection. During the trial, 2.5 g/kg indigestible index (chromium oxide)
was added to the diet. A hundred-gram excreta sample was collected daily per
cage at phase 1 (9–11 d) and phase 2 (30–33 d). A forced
air-drying oven was applied to dry the samples at 60°C temperature
for 72 h and minced with Wiley laboratory mill (Thomas Model 4
Wiley®Mill, Thomas scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) by
1 mm screen.
The total nutrient utilization used this formula as:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Hydrogel Fabrication from Decellularized Matrices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain the hDNM-gel and pDNM-gel, the lyophilised hDNM and pDNM scaffolds were first ground into powder using a Thomas Model 4 Wiley® Mill (Thomas Scientific, MA, USA). Then, thehDNM and pDNM powders were digested in 1 mg/mL pepsin dissolved in 0.01 M HCl (C0680110213, Nanjing Reagent, Nanjing, China). The digested solution was subjected to centrifugation at 44,760 × g (Optima MAX-XP, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) for 30 minutes to remove all the undissolved particulates. Afterwards, the solution was neutralised to pH ~7.4 using 0.1 M NaOH (BD27, Guangzhou Chemical reagent Factory, Guangzhou, China) and diluted to reach an ionic equilibrium using 10× PBS (P1022-500, Solarbio, Beijing, China). The pre-gel solution was stored at –20°C or gelled at 37°C to obtain either hDNM-gel or pDNM-gel. The final concentration of both hydrogels was 1% (w/v).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Forage Nutrient Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Every week, feed samples were taken from each pellet bag and bale of lucerne hay and bulked. The bulked samples were stored at −20 °C until the end of the feeding trial. The feed samples were dried at 60 °C over 72 h, ground to pass through a 1 mm sieve using a Laboratory Mill (Thomas Model 4 Wiley® Mill; Thomas Scientific) and analysed using the standard laboratory analytical methods of AOAC39 for DM and ash. Neutral Detergent (NDF) and Acid Detergent (ADF) fibre contents were determined using an Ankom Fibre Analyzer (ANKOM2000; ANKOM Technology, USA). Nitrogen content was quantified using a Thermo Finnigan EA 1112 Series Flash Elemental Analyzer and the values multiplied by 6.25 to give the estimated crude protein (CP) percentage. Ether extract (EE) was analysed using an ANKOMXT15 fat/oil extractor (ANKOM Technology, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Nutrient Digestibility in Gestating Swine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From d 104 to 112 of gestation, chromic oxide (0.25%), an inert indigestible indicator, was added into the diet to evaluate the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter (DM), gross energy (GE), CP, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF). Fecal samples were collected at the last 4 d of gestation to measure the ATTD of DM, GE, CP, NDF, and ADF. The harvested samples were pooled within a pen and subjected to drying in a forced-air drying oven at 60 °C for 72 h, and then ground in a mill (Thomas Model 4 Wiley Mill, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) using a 1-mm screen in order to determine chemical analysis. The samples were analyzed in triplicate with method number 930.15 for DM, 990.03 for CP, and 973.18 for ADF, 991.43 for total SF and ISF based on AOAC (2007) . The GE of diet and feces was determined by a calorimeter bomb (Model 1261, Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL), and the concentration of chromium (Fenton and Fenton, 1979 (link)) was measured using a spectrophotometer (Jasco V-650, Jasco Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The NDF determination was performed gravimetrically by mixing samples with neutral detergent, sodium sulfite, and amylase. The processed samples were filtrated with a glass filter (1.5-μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Forage Sample Preparation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Supplementary and basal feed samples were oven-dried for three days at 60 °C, cooled, and ground to pass through a 1 mm sieve using a laboratory mill (Thomas Model 4 Wiley® Mill; Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA). Dry matter and ash percentages were determined using the AOAC standard laboratory analytical techniques [34 ]. Neutral detergent (NDF) and acid detergent (ADF) fiber percentages were determined using an Ankom Fiber Analyzer (ANKOM2000; ANKOM Technology, Macedon, NY, USA). Nitrogen content was determined using a Thermo Finnigan EA 1112 Series Flash Elemental Analyzer (Thermo Finnigan, Poway, CA, USA) and the values were multiplied by 6.25 to provide the expected crude protein (CP) percentage. Ether extract (EE) was analyzed employing an ANKOMXT15 fat/oil extractor (ANKOM Technology, Macedon, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Standardized Sample Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were weighted with a Henkel balance (± 0.01) and dried until constant weight in an oven at 70 °C. Dry samples were ground with a Thomas Model 4 Wiley® Mill (Thomas Scientific) until a homogeneous mass was obtained. All samples were kept in sealed containers to avoid contact with atmospheric humidity.1 g of ground sample was weighed with an OHAUS PA313 balance (± 0.001 g) and used for sample digestion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!