The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using anti rabbit texas red

1

Immunoblot and Immunofluorescence Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used in immunoblots and immunofluorescence: rabbit anti-G3BP1 [14 (link)], mouse anti-G3BP1 (Bethyl Labs, Montgomery, TX, USA), rabbit anti-G3BP2 (Assay Biotech, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), goat anti-TIA1 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), goat anti-TIAR (Santa Cruz), anti-Rck/p54(DDX6) (gift from CE Cameron), anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (ThermoFisher, Rockford, IL, USA), anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen), anti-rabbit Texas Red (ThermoFisher), anti-goat Texas Red (ThermoFisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Analysis of VCAM-1 and ZO-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
bEnd5 cells (2.5 × 103/well) were seeded onto glass coverslips in 24‐well plates. Cells were pre‐stimulated with VCE‐004.8 at several concentrations for 1 h and incubated for 24 h with interleukin 1 beta (IL1β) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) plus tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) (R&D Systems) (for VCAM1 study) or interleukin 6 (IL-6) (R&D Systems) plus TNFα (for ZO-1 study). Cells were then washed with PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature (RT). After fixation, cells were washed twice with PBS, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS at RT for 5 min and blocked in PBS with 3% BSA for 1 h. Cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies diluted in PBS with 3% BSA: rabbit monoclonal anti-VCAM1 (1:100, #ab134047, Abcam) or rabbit polyclonal anti-ZO-1 (1:100, #10,222,233, Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA, USA). Next, cells were washed three times with PBS and incubated with the secondary antibody anti-rabbit Texas Red (1:100, #A-6399, Thermo Fischer Scientific) for 1 h at RT. Finally, coverslips were mounted with Vectashield Mounting Medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for nuclear staining. Images were acquired using a spectral confocal laser-scanning microscope LSM710 (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with 25 × /0.8 Plan-Apochromat oil immersion lens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Staining of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We adapted the immunofluorescence (IF) staining protocol in this study from Cheng et al.17 (link) Briefly, tissues were dehydrated, paraffin-embedded, and cut into 5-μM thick sections that were mounted onto slides. Sections were deparaffinized and blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Antibodies were diluted in PBS with 1% bovine serum albumin. Anti-CD3+ (Abcam ab16669), anti-CD4+(Thermo Fisher MA1-146, Carlsbad, CA), anti-CD8a+(eBioscience 45-0081-80), anti-CD25+ (Thermo Fisher MA512680) and anti-FoxP3+ (Thermo Fisher 14-5773-82), anti-rabbit Texas Red (Thermo Fisher T2767), anti-rat Texas Red (Thermo Fisher T-6392), and anti-mouse Alexa Flour 594 (Thermo Fisher A-11032) were used for IF staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of Antidepressant-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunostaining was done accordingly to Mytych et al. 2017 [16 (link)]. Briefly, cells were seeded at standard density, treated with antidepressant drugs, fixed with 4% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1 % Triton-X, blocked with 1% BSA, and incubated with primary antibody: anti-NuMa (1:500, #PA1-32451, RRID: AB_2154615) and anti-alpha tubulin (1:500, #A11126, RRID: AB_2534135) (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The secondary antibodies used were anti-rabbit Texas Red (1:100, #T-2767, RRID: AB_2556776) and anti-mouse Cy3 (1:100, #A10521, RRID: AB_2534030) (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33258. Images were captured with InCell Analyzer 2000 and analyzed with analyzing module.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence and Proximity Ligation Assay in HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUVEC for immunofluorescence and PLA were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and permeabilized for 3 min with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS before blocking with 3% BSA for 1 h. For immunofluorescence, cells were incubated with the following primary antibodies: mouse anti-ERG (sc-376293, 1:200, Santa Cruz) and rabbit anti-phospho-Tie2 (Y992) (AF2720, 1:500, R&D systems). Secondary antibodies used were anti-mouse AF 488 and anti-rabbit Texas Red (all from Invitrogen). Nuclei were visualized using DAPI. PLA was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the Duolink In Situ Orange Kit Mouse/Rabbit (Sigma) and the following primary antibodies: rabbit-anti ERG (ab133264, 1:500, Abcam), mouse anti-β-catenin (clone 17, 610153, BD) and mouse anti-phosphoserine antibody (clone PSR-45, P5747, Sigma). Nuclei were visualized using DAPI. Confocal microscopy was carried out on a Carl Zeiss LSM780. Images were analysed with ImageJ (NIH) and Volocity (Version 6.3, PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Monocyte Interaction with NETs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs (1 × 106; 1 mL) were incubated for 2 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 to allow monocytes to adhere to coverslips. Non-adherent cells were washed out and adhered monocytes were incubated with NETs-enriched supernatants (2 µg of DNA) for 4 h and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Slides were stained with DAPI (10 µg/mL; Sigma), anti-elastase (1:800 v/v; Calbiochem), or anti-histone/DNA complex (1:150 v/v; Abcam), followed by anti-rabbit-FITC (1:150 v/v; Vector Labs) or anti-rabbit-Texas Red (1:150 v/v; Invitrogen), respectively. Epifluorescence images were taken in a Zeiss Axioplan using 40× objectives.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!