The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using anti pd l1 pe

1

Isolating Ma-Mel-36 Subpopulations by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following directly labelled antibodies were used for staining of cellular surface markers: anti-HLA-ABC-APC (eBiosciences, clone W6/32; 1 μl), anti-CD54-PE (Beckmann Coulter, clone 84H10; 2.5 μl), anti-PD-L1-PE (Biolegend, clone 29E2A3; 5 μl) and anti-HLA-DR-PC7 (Beckmann Coulter, clone Immun-357; 2.5 μl). After fixation, stained cells were analysed by flow cytometry on a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckmann Coulter) and Kaluza (Beckman Coulter) software, respectively, for data analysis. In order to isolate specific Ma-Mel-36 subpopulations, cells were stained with anti-HLA-DR-PC7 and sorted based on the specific expression of the surface markers by flow cytometry on an Aria II cell sorter and the FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CIK Cell Phenotyping and RCC PD-L Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenotype of CIK cells was detected by a multiparameter flow cytometric analysis using monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD3-FITC, anti-CD56-PE, anti-CD4-APC, anti-CD8a-Brilliant Violet 421, anti-PD-1-APC and anti-CTLA-4-APC (obtained from Biolegend, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) and 7AAD (a viability probe for methods of dead cell exclusion, BD biosciences, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.). To observe the surface expression of PD-L1/PD-L2 on RCC cell lines, we stained with monoclonal antibodies anti-PD-L1-PE and anti-PD-L2-Brilliant Violet 421 (obtained from Biolegend, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) and 7AAD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Murine Monoclonal Antibodies for Immunodetection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following murine mAbs were used for IHC: W6/32 to detect HLA class I antigens (Dianova); bbm.1 to stain for β2m (kindly provided by G. Moldenhauer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany); anti–HMB-45 (Dako) to detect melanoma cells; anti-CD3 (BD Pharmingen) to stain for T cells.
For flow cytometry, the mouse mAbs were as follows: anti–HLA-ABC-APC (eBiosciences), anti–CD54-PE and anti–HLA-DR-PECy7 (Beckmann Coulter), anti–PD-L1-PE and anti–PD-L2 (Biolegend), anti–B7-H3 (R&D Systems), anti–B7-H4 (eBiosciences); L243 was used for detection of HLA-DR molecules (17 (link)) and HC10 for labelling of β2m-free HLA heavy chains (18 (link), 19 (link)).
The following antibodies were used for Western blot analysis: mouse anti–Melan-A/MART-1 (Zytomed), mouse anti-Tyrosinase and anti-MITF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit anti-DCT/TRP2 (kindly provided by V. Hearing, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda); mouse anti-STAT1, rabbit anti-phospho(p)STAT1, rabbit anti-JAK1, rabbit anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology); rabbit anti-IRF1 and mouse anti-β2m (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); rabbit anti-β2m (Sigma); mouse anti-TAP1 (NOB-1) and mouse anti-tapasin (TO-3; ref. 20 (link)); mouse mAb HC10 (18 (link), 19 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Dendritic Cell Activation and Tolerance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the activation/maturation markers, the cells were stained for 20 min at 4 °C with an anti-MHCII eFluor450, an anti-CD40 APC, an anti-CD80 FITC, an anti-CD86 PE, an anti-mPDCA PEeFluor610, and anti-CD11c PC7 antibodies. All antibodies were purchased from eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA, and each was diluted in PBS containing 0.5% of BSA (bovine serum albumin, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 2 mM EDTA (Fisher Chemical, Leicerstershire, UK), and 1/20 FcR Bloking Reagent (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergish Gladbach, Germany). In steady state, pDCs and cDCs were distinguished through the expression of CD11c+mPDCA+ for pDCs and CD11c+mPDCA− cells for cDCs. To study tolerogenic markers, the same staining protocol was performed using anti-PDL1 PE (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CTLA4 APC (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergish Gladbach, Germany), and anti-CD11c PC7 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of Blood Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred microliters of whole blood were stained with anti-CD3-PECy7 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA; clone HIT3a), anti-CD8-PECy5 (BioLegend; clone SK1), anti-PD-L1-PE (BioLegend; clone 29E.2A3), anti-CD14-PECy7 (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA; clone M5E2), anti-CD41a-FITC (Immunotools, Friesoythe, Germany; clone HIP8), and anti-CD62P-APC (Immunotools; clone HI62P). The cells were then incubated for 15 min in the dark before adding 2 mL of BD FACS lysing solution 1X (BD Bioscience) for 10 min. Finally, the cells were washed with 2 mL of PBS 1X and resuspended in 400 µL of PBS 1X before acquisition by flow cytometry (MACSQuant Analyzer 10 flow cytometer; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Galdbach, Germany). Negative gates for each marker were defined by fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying PD-L1 Expression in LCLs and DLBCLs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For surface labeling, the same protocol of seeding and treatment as described above for cell cycle analysis was followed. LCLs and DLBCLs cells were collected and washed with DPBS. Then, they were labeled for 15 min in the dark at RT with anti-PD-L1-PE (Biolegend) (Table S1). Intracellular PD-L1 staining was performed on LCLs and DLBCLs cells treated with native fucoidan or F1/F2 fractions using the IntraPrep Permeabilization Reagent kit (Beckman Coulter) according to the protocol recommended by the supplier. Acquisitions were performed on FACSCalibur. Results were analyzed with Kaluza Analysis 2.1 Software. Fold change was calculated based on the mean fluorescence intensity ratio of PD-L1 on its isotypic control, and then normalized to the control (untreated cells).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies were purchased from Biolegend. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-CD16/CD32 (Biolegend, Cat#: 101301, clone: 93), anti-CD8-PE-cy7 (Biolegend, Cat#: 100721, clone: 53-6.7), anti-CD11c-FITC (Biolegend, Cat#: 117305, clone: N418) and anti-CD11b-Pacif blue (Biolegend, Cat#: 101223, clone: M1/70), anti-B220-APC-cy7 (Biolegend, Cat#: 103223, clone: RA3-6B2), anti-CD86-PE (Biolegend, Cat#: 105007, clone: GL-1), anti- H-2Kb bound to SIINFEKL-APC (Biolegend, Cat#:141605, clone:25-D1.16), anti-CD45.2-APC (Biolegend, Cat#:109814, clone:104), anti-CD45.2-APCcy7 (Biolegend, Cat#:109823, clone:104), anti-PD-L1-PE (Biolegend, Cat#:124307, clone:10F.9G2), isotype control-PE (Biolegend, Cat#:400607, clone:RTK4530), anti-F4/80-PE/cy7 (Biolegend, Cat#:123113, clone:BM8), anti-Gr-1-FITC (Biolegend, Cat#:108419, clone:RB608C5), anti-MHCII-BV605 (Biolegend, Cat#:107639, clone:M5/114.15.2), anti-rabbit IgG-PE (Biolegend, Cat#:406421, clone:poly4064). Flow data were acquired on a BD LSR II flow cytometer and analyzed using Flowjo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immune Checkpoint Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression of PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 was assessed retrospectively in prospectively collected blood samples. The following combination of human monoclonal antibodies were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions to identify different immune cell populations (CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes): anti-CD3-FITC, anti-PD-L1-PE, anti-CD8-APC Cy7, anti-PD-1-PE Cy7, anti-PD-L2-APC and anti-CD4-PerCp (BioLegend; San Diego, CA, US). The PBMC fraction was blocked for 5 minutes with a FAB anti-IgG. Samples were incubated for 45 minutes with the appropriate antibodies (2.5 μl) at room temperature and protected from light exposure. After incubation, 2 ml of a 1:1 solution of PBS-Fetal bovine serum (FBS) were added to each sample. Samples were then centrifuged at 1100 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was decanted and cells were fixed in paraformaldehyde (1%).
Gating strategy were set using fluorescence minus one (FMO) for PD-1 /PD-L1 &PD-L2. The samples were acquired in a FACS Aria II Flow Cytometer (BD, Biosciences, San José, Cal, USA) and analyzed with FlowJo software 10.1 (Tree Star. Ashland, Or, USA). The leukocyte population was gated based on morphological parameters on a forward vs side scatter (FSC/SSC) plot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies were purchased from Biolegend. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-CD16/CD32 (Biolegend, Cat#: 101301, clone: 93), anti-CD8-PE-cy7 (Biolegend, Cat#: 100721, clone: 53-6.7), anti-CD11c-FITC (Biolegend, Cat#: 117305, clone: N418) and anti-CD11b-Pacif blue (Biolegend, Cat#: 101223, clone: M1/70), anti-B220-APC-cy7 (Biolegend, Cat#: 103223, clone: RA3-6B2), anti-CD86-PE (Biolegend, Cat#: 105007, clone: GL-1), anti- H-2Kb bound to SIINFEKL-APC (Biolegend, Cat#:141605, clone:25-D1.16), anti-CD45.2-APC (Biolegend, Cat#:109814, clone:104), anti-CD45.2-APCcy7 (Biolegend, Cat#:109823, clone:104), anti-PD-L1-PE (Biolegend, Cat#:124307, clone:10F.9G2), isotype control-PE (Biolegend, Cat#:400607, clone:RTK4530), anti-F4/80-PE/cy7 (Biolegend, Cat#:123113, clone:BM8), anti-Gr-1-FITC (Biolegend, Cat#:108419, clone:RB608C5), anti-MHCII-BV605 (Biolegend, Cat#:107639, clone:M5/114.15.2), anti-rabbit IgG-PE (Biolegend, Cat#:406421, clone:poly4064). Flow data were acquired on a BD LSR II flow cytometer and analyzed using Flowjo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Exosomal PD-L1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The staining method used for flow cytometry of exosomes coupled to beads was modified based on the methods described by Morales–Kastresana [36 (link)] and Theodoraki [37 (link)]. Briefly, 10 µg exosome protein was coincubated with 1 µg biotin-labeled anti-CD63 antibody (353,018, Biolegend) for 2 h at room temperature. Next, 15 µL of streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (MBL International) was added and the compounds were gently agitated on a shaker for 2 h at room temperature. The samples were washed once with dilution buffer from the kit and then coincubated with 10 µL of the detection antibody anti-PD-L1 PE (329706, Biolegend) or the labeled isotype control antibody (400314, Biolegend) for 1 h at room temperature. The complexes were resuspended in 100 µL PBS after washing them three times with dilution buffer for antigen detection (Beckman Coulter CytoFlex). The lower edge of the “positive gate” was set at the point where  < 2% of the isotype control was positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!