The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sanger sequencing

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in United States, Germany

Sanger sequencing is a DNA sequencing method that uses chain-termination inhibitors to determine the nucleotide sequence of a DNA sample. It is a widely used laboratory technique for analyzing genetic information.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using sanger sequencing

1

Primer Extension Analysis of Gene Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primer extension analysis was performed using the 5’ RACE kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cDNA synthesis was performed using gene specific primers (GSP) listed in Table 1. cDNA was purified and used in TdT reactions that added a poly-cytosine tail to the 5’ end of the cDNA. Tailed cDNA was subsequently used in PCR reactions with an internal GSP primer (ackA-GSP2 or pta-GSP2—Table 1) and an abridged anchor primer provided by Invitrogen. PCR products were analyzed on an agarose gel, purified on a Qiaquick PCR purification column (Qiagen) and subjected to Sanger sequencing (ACGT Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CRISPR-Cas9 Mediated Deletion of Hsd11b1 Exon1 in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two gRNAs flanking exon1 region of Hsd11b1 were designed using the software CRISPOR (http://crispor.tefor.net/). Both gRNAs were synthesized, mixed with Cas9 protein and microinjected into 30-50 mouse zygotes at the Medical Research Council transgenic facility in Imperial College London. F0 compound homozygous were crossed with wild type. F1 heterozygous mice were sequenced to determine whether exon1 is deleted. Heterozygous mice positive for exon1 deletion were then crossed to generate wild-type, heterozygous and homozygous littermates. Genotyping PCR reaction was carried out using the primer set listed in Table 1. PCR products were then column-purified (PCR purification, Qiagen) and sent for Sanger sequencing (Genewiz, Germany). A group of 14 animals underwent VSG and sham surgery. A group of littermate Wild Type mice (n=5) was also sham operated and function as an additional control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bovine CD14 Promoter Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We extracted genomic DNA from 200µL of whole blood utilizing the Isolate II Genomic DNA extraction kit (Bioline USA Inc., Swedesboro, NJ, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions; a final volume of 100 µL eluted DNA was stored at 4 °C until use and concentration was quantified with a spectrometer (PG Instruments Ltd, England, UK). Specific primer pairs were designed with Primer Express (version 4.0) to amplify the ~1.6 kB promoter region of bovine CD14 gene (Supplementary Table S1). Using primer pairs and EconoTaq Plus Green 2X PCR master mix (Lucigen Corporation, Middleton, WI, USA), we amplified 1 μL of genomic DNA, optimizing reactions to a final volume of 25 μL [16 (link)]. The PCR conditions were programmed as follows: 94 °C for 2 min, and 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 59 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 50 s, then the final extension for 5 min at 72 °C. Five microliters of amplified products were examined and band size was determined with a GeneRuler 100bp Plus DNA ladder (Supplementary Table S1). Amplified PCR products (n = 40) were purified with QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA), and 2 μL of purified products were prepared for Sanger sequencing (Genewiz, South Plainfield, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Norovirus Genotyping from UNEX Disks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For norovirus genotyping, RNA eluted from the UNEX disks was amplified using hemi-nested conventional RT-PCR (Kitajima et al., 2010 (link)) using the OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). PCR products were separated on 2% gels and bands of appropriate size were purified using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) followed by Sanger sequencing (Eurofin, Operon, Louisville, KY). Sequences were edited and aligned using Sequencher (v 5.1, Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan) and MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016 (link)) and genotyped as previously described (Cannon et al., 2017 ) or using the online Human Calicivirus Typing Tool at https://norovirus.ng.philab.cdc.gov.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SARS-CoV-2 S Gene Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed on virion RNA from virus stock passages using a range of primers (Table 2). Reactions were performed with a Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) using a virus-specific forward primer that bound in orf1ab. The cDNAs encoding S gene sequences were amplified by PCR, either in their entirety or as four overlapping fragments, were carried out using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs). Amplicons were agarose gel-extracted and purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) before Sanger sequencing (Genewiz, New Jersey).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Profiling of Meningioma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variants identified by WES, as well as selected regions of previously published genes implicated in meningioma (NF2, AKT1, TRAF7, SMO, and KLF4), were analyzed by PCR and Sanger sequencing. Mutant sites from NF2 (22), TRAF7 (5), AKT1 (1), SMO (2), KLF4 (1), and TERT (2) were sequenced. DNA from the four meningioma cell lines and one normal human cell line (293T) were amplified using PCR primers designed to target identified mutations (S1 Table). PCR products were separated by 1% agarose gel, visualized under UV light, extracted using the Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit (Valencia, CA), and subject to Sanger sequencing (Macrogen, Boston, MA). Mutant variants identified by Sanger sequencing were verified by alignment of sequenced results with sequences of normal human cell line 293T and human genomic DNA reference (hg19). Furthermore, the TERT promoter region was focally sequenced across cell lines to assess for presence of TERT mutations, given the important role it may play in meningioma progression [7 (link), 21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing by RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed on virion RNA from virus stock passages using a range of primers (Table 2). cDNA reactions were performed with a SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) using a virus-specific forward primer that bound in orf1ab. The cDNAs encoding S gene sequences were amplified by PCR, either in their entirety or as four overlapping fragments, using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs [NEB]). Amplicons were agarose gel-extracted and purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) before Sanger sequencing (Genewiz, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Single-Cell Polylox Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the isolation of single HSC, BM cells were stained as described
above. During FACS sorting, individual cells were deposited into 8-tube PCR
stripes containing in each well 25 μl lysis buffer (12.6 μg
proteinase K (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in PCR buffer 1 (Roche)). Lysis was done
for 1 h at 55 °C, terminated at 95 °C for 10 min, and cooled to 4
°C before adding the remaining PCR reagents to a final volume of 50
μl. The Polylox cassette was then amplified by nested
PCR. First round PCR: primer #2450 (see above) and primer #494
(5′-AGCTACAGCCTCGATTTGTGGTG-3′) for 5 min at 95 °C; (30 s
at 95 °C, 30 s at 56 °C, 5 min at 72 °C) 35 times; 10 min
at 72 °C. Second round PCR: 1-2 μl of first PCR reaction was used
as template and amplified with primers #2426
5′-CGACGACACTGCCAAAGATTTC-3′ and #2427 (see above) for 5 min at 95
°C; (30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 62 °C, 5 min at 72 °C)
35 times; 10 min at 72 °C. The nested PCR products were purified by
QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen), analyzed by gel electrophoresis for
product length, and analyzed by Sanger sequencing (GATC Biotech). Barcodes were
decoded for each of these sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Single-Cell Polylox Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the isolation of single HSC, BM cells were stained as described
above. During FACS sorting, individual cells were deposited into 8-tube PCR
stripes containing in each well 25 μl lysis buffer (12.6 μg
proteinase K (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in PCR buffer 1 (Roche)). Lysis was done
for 1 h at 55 °C, terminated at 95 °C for 10 min, and cooled to 4
°C before adding the remaining PCR reagents to a final volume of 50
μl. The Polylox cassette was then amplified by nested
PCR. First round PCR: primer #2450 (see above) and primer #494
(5′-AGCTACAGCCTCGATTTGTGGTG-3′) for 5 min at 95 °C; (30 s
at 95 °C, 30 s at 56 °C, 5 min at 72 °C) 35 times; 10 min
at 72 °C. Second round PCR: 1-2 μl of first PCR reaction was used
as template and amplified with primers #2426
5′-CGACGACACTGCCAAAGATTTC-3′ and #2427 (see above) for 5 min at 95
°C; (30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 62 °C, 5 min at 72 °C)
35 times; 10 min at 72 °C. The nested PCR products were purified by
QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen), analyzed by gel electrophoresis for
product length, and analyzed by Sanger sequencing (GATC Biotech). Barcodes were
decoded for each of these sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genetic Analysis of ERCC6 Mutation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WES of the proband was performed by the Beijing Genomics Institute®, and the result was interpretated by Dr. Pi-Lin Sung, a clinical geneticist at Shuang Ho hospital in Taiwan. Sequencing reads were mapped to the GRCh37/hg19 reference genome by using the Burrows–Wheeler algorithm [10 ]. The WES test report revealed the presence of a missense mutation in the ERCC6 gene due to a homozygous point mutation at the genomic level [NM_000124.2: c.1607T>G; p.Leu536Trp].
Sanger sequencing of the proband and his parents was performed to determine if this mutation was inherited from the parents or were caused by a sporadic event. The DNA encoding portion of the ERCC6 gene was PCR amplified from the genomic DNA using the following primer pairs: ERCC6 (c.1607T>G, p.Leu536Trp) F: CTGCCCTACAGCTCCATT and R: TCCACCATTTGCCATTTT (PCR product: 386 bp). The resulting PCR products were purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen®) and then subjected to Sanger sequencing (Genomics®, Taipei, Taiwan).
Several bioinformatics databases were used to interpret the pathogenicity of this mutation in the ERCC6 gene, including Varsome, Uniport, ClinVar, ClinVar Miner, and dbSNP. Furthermore, the allele frequency of the variant was investigated in the Taiwan BioBank as a local database and in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) as a global database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!