When considering all diagnostic groups, overall differences in components of the NAD+ metabolome were compared with one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA). When ArLD was compared to the aggregate values all other non‐ArLD liver diseases, Student t tests were used because data were normally distributed. To consider individual components of the NAD+ metabolome (between normal and ArLD liver tissue or ArLD specimens with or without steatohepatitis), Sidak’s method to correct for multiple comparisons was used. Statistical analyses were performed in Prism v6 for Mac (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
Prism v6 for mac
Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States
Prism v6 for Mac is a scientific software application developed by GraphPad for data analysis, curve fitting, and graph creation. It provides a suite of tools for researchers and scientists to visualize, analyze, and present their data.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
2 protocols using prism v6 for mac
1
NAD+ Metabolome Differences in Alcoholic Liver Disease
2
Comparative Analysis of Suspension Viability
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
All data were graphed and analyzed in Prism v6 for Mac (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). One-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) compared multiple conditions for a single independent and dependent variable (e.g., vehicle density, viscosity, suspension viability, and LDH) with Bonferroni post hoc testing. Two-way ANOVAs were used to determine statistical differences between more than one independent variable (e.g., sedimentation, clumping) using Tukey's post hoc test. Repeatedmeasures ANOVAs compared measurements that occurred over time (e.g., pipetting viability, temperature effects) with Tukey's post hoc test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!