The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using axis ultra dld 600 w

1

Comprehensive Characterization of Hybrid Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the synthesized bMSNs, CeNP, bMSNs@Ce, and RVG29-bMSNs@Ce-1F12 was characterized by Tecnai G20 (FEI Ltd., NL), Nova Nano scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (FEI., NL) and SPM9700 atomic force microscope (AFM) (Shimadzu., Japan). Dynamic light scattering and Zeta potential were performed on a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 device (Malvern Instruments, UK). XRD was scanned by x’pert3 powder (PANalytical B.V., Holland). The element types and contents of bMSNs@Ce were analyzed by EDS (Sirion 200, EFI, Holland). The valence states of elements were analyzed by XPS (AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600 W, Kratos, Japan). Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) was scanned by Nicolet iS50R (Thermo Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Mo2C Crystals and Heterostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An optical microscope (DM4000M, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI NOVA NanoSEM 450), and transmission electron microscope (TEM) (FEI Titan G2 60–300) were used to characterize the Mo2C crystals and Mo2C—Gr heterostructure. A Raman spectrum was collected by a Raman spectroscopy (LabRAM HR800, He-Ne laser excitation at 532 nm). The X-ray diffraction patterns of Mo2C were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical B.V. X’pert PRO). A Newport 69,907 solar simulator and a Keithley 2600 SourceMeter were used for measuring the photovoltaic properties of the Mo2C—Gr/Sb2S0.42Se2.58/TiO2/FTO device under the condition of AM 1.5. An oscilloscope (WaveAce 1012, WaveAce, New York, NY, USA) was used to measure the response and recovery time of the device. The current-time characteristics of the photodetector were measured by a low-temperature cryogenic probe station (CRX–6.5K, Lake Shore, Westerville, OH, USA), a semiconductor parameter analyzer (4200-SCS, Keithley, Cleveland, OH, USA) and a light source (LDLS, EQ-1500, Energetiq, Woburn, MA, USA). Nyquist curves and frequency-dependent impedance were measured by the electrochemical workstation (CHI 660E, Huachen, Shanghai, China). An ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600W, Kratos, Tokyo, Japan) was employed for the work function measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies and microstructures of all samples were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi S4800, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI TecnaiTM G2 F30, USA) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, Oxford Instrument, UK). The phase components, elements and corresponding chemical states were detected by powder X-ray diffraction on a X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Philips X’Pert Pro MPD, the Netherlands) with Cu-Kα irradiation (λ = 1.54056 Å), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), EDX and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos AXIS UltraDLD, 600 W, UK) with an monochrome Al-Kα probe beam. All the recorded XPS spectra were calibrated using C 1 s peak with the binding energy of 284.8 eV and were analyzed through Gaussian-fitting. A vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Lakeshore 7403, USA) was used to investigate the room temperature magnetic properties of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of WO3-x/C Nanowires

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using a Philips X'Pert Pro (PANanalytical B.V., Netherlands) Super diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54118 Å). SEM images were obtained via field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, FEI Nova NanoSEM 450) equipped with an X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai G20), Raman scattering (InVo-RENISHAW), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Bruker Vertex 80 V) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos AXIS Ultra DLD-600 W) were also performed. The thermogravimetric-differential analysis (TG-DSC) was performed on Perkin Elmer Diamond TG-DTA at a temperature ramping rate of 10 °C min−1 under air. A four-point probe on a Si template was then designed and fabricated to measure the conductivity of a single hierarchical WO3−x/C nanowire and pure WO3 nanowire.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In2Te3 Thin Film Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used optical microscope (OM, MV6100) to select promising samples with integrity and uniformity. To authenticate elemental composition and chemical states of the deposited films, we used Raman spectroscopy (LabRAM HR800, Horiba JobinYvon) with an excitation laser of 532 nm, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS-ULTRADLD-600W, Kratos) techniques. And investigation of thickness information was carried out by the atomic-force microscopy (AFM, SPM9700, Shimadzu). The crystallographic structure of In2Te3 films was examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Empyrean, PANalytical B.V.) as well as transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM2100HR).Finally the transport properties were conducted by physical property measurement system (PPMS, Quantum Design) with a four-terminal configuration using silver electrodes and temperature range from 300 to 2 K. The electrodes were fabricated with the same area, shape, and the distance between neighbouring electrodes. For the MR measurements, the variable magnetic field was set as 40 Oe s−1 (1 T = 10000 Oe) under the vertical magnetic field at 2, 5, 10 and 30 K respectively. For the resistance measurements, the cooling rate was set as 2 K min−1 with the interval of ∼1 K. All the resistance measurements were carried out at a constant current mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Pt/WO3 Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase of the Pt/WO3 was investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα X-ray source. The morphology was characterized by using a Zeiss Ultra Plus field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). Transmission electron microscopic (TEM), high resolution transmission electron microscopic (HRTEM) images and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern were collected using a JEOL JEM-2100F STEM/EDS microscope. FT-IR spectra were obtained with Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700. The oxidation state and relative chemical composition of Pt/WO3 were evaluated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) in a Kratos AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600 W.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Se0.7Te0.3 Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) characterization of Se0.7Te0.3 films were checked by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, GeminiSEM, Zeiss, without Pt coating). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation (Empyrean, PANalytical B.V.) was carried out to determine the component and orientation of Se0.7Te0.3 and ZnO films. The morphologies of the Se1−xTex and ZnO films were observed by the atomic force microscope (AFM, SPM9700, Shimadzu). The optical transmittance of Se1−xTex film was recorded by UV–Vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Instruments, Lambda 950 using integrating sphere). Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS, AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600 W, Kratos) was used to confirm the energy level positions of Se0.7Te0.3. The Hall coefficient and carrier concentration were obtained via a Hall measurement system (Ecopia HMS5500). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600 W) was used to characterize the interface between Se1−xTex and ZnO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Physicochemical Characterization of Copper Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic diameter and Zeta-potential profiles were acquired on a dynamic light scattering instrument (DLS, Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern, UK). The morphology of NPs was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, HT7700 HITACHI Co., Japan, accelerating voltage: 120 kV). The micro-area element analysis was conducted on field emission transmission electron microscopy (FTEM, Talos F200X, FEI Co., Netherlands, accelerating voltage: 200 kV). Copper content was determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, PerkinElmer Ltd., Co., USA). Copper valence was measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600 W, Shimadzu-Kratos Co., Japan). Characteristic groups of the samples were verified using a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, VERTEX 70, Bruker Co., Germany). The absorption spectra were collected using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Lambda 35, PerkinElmer Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The cellular behavior was observed using Confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, Olympus, FV3000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Silver Nanoparticle Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the treated surfaces in different groups were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FSEM, Nova NanoSEM 450, FEI, USA) was used to characterize the morphologies of silver nanoparticles at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The surface roughness of the samples was characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM, SPM-9700HT, Shimadzu, Japan). The following parameters were calculated: Sa (the arithmetic mean roughness), Sq (the root-mean-square roughness), and Df (the fractal dimension) [26 (link)].
The chemical state and elemental depth profile were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600W, Shimadzu, Japan) to validate the existence and various amounts of silver in those different groups. The measured samples are solid disks with the diameter of 15 mm and thickness of 1 mm. A monochromatized Al Kα was used to irradiate the samples with the photon energy of 1486.6 eV and the X-ray spot size of 300 × 700 μm. Besides, the expected resolution of the measurement was 0.45 eV. In terms of data processing, the software of XPSPEAK41 was use to analyze the measurement results. The energy scale of the XPS spectra was corrected using the binding energy of adventitious carbon (C 1 s at 285 eV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detailed Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM (Nova Nano-SEM 450) and TEM (Tecnai G2-20) images were collected to obtain the morphology and structure information of samples. The thickness of the sample was characterized by the AFM (Bruker Dimension Icon). The information on chemical compositions and elemental oxidation states was acquired by XPS (AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600W, Shimadzu-Kratos, Japan). 2D-XRD patterns were obtained on VANTEC500. FTIR (Nicolet iS50R, Thermo Scientific Inc., USA) spectra were tested in a KBr tablet from 4,000 to 400 cm−1 at room temperature. Gas products were analyzed by a Shimadzu GC 2030 gas chromatograph. Liquid products were analyzed by an NMR spectroscopy (AscendTM 600 M, Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!