The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Click it cell reaction kit

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific

The Click-it cell reaction kit is a laboratory tool designed for the detection and analysis of nucleic acid synthesis in cells. It provides a method for the incorporation and detection of modified nucleotides, enabling the study of cellular processes related to DNA and RNA metabolism.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using click it cell reaction kit

1

Comprehensive Cell Ultrastructure Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured cells and tissues were prepared as previously described using a combination of glutaraldehyde fixation, ferrocyanide reduced osmium tetroxide post-fixation, thiocarbohydrazide and osmium tetroxide liganding, followed by en bloc uranyl acetate and lead aspartate staining (Deerinck et al., 2010 , Ngo et al., 2016 (link), Williams et al., 2011 (link)). Cultured cells were also stained for DNA using click-chemistry as previously described (Ngo et al., 2016 (link)). Briefly, HeLa cells were incubated overnight in media containing 10 micromolar 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU, Life Technologies) and the following day, copper-mediated click-chemistry (Click-iT Cell Reaction Kit, Invitrogen) was used to attach dibromofluorescein-azide (1 micromolar) to the EdU incorporated into cellular DNA during replication, which was then used to photooxidize diaminobenzidine into a reaction product prior to treatment with osmium tetroxide (Ngo et al., 2016 (link)). Cultured cells were also prepared using a genetically targeted ascorbate peroxidase in order to stain the endomembrane system (Martell et al., 2012 (link)). Epoxy embedded samples were mounted to aluminum pins (Gatan) using either silver epoxy (Ted Pella, Redding CA) or cyanoacrylic adhesive, or mounted on a custom designed tip-tilt holder and sputter coated with a thin layer of Au/Pd prior to block-face imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolically Labeled Salmonella Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The indicated S. Typhi strains were grown in TTIM for 24 hr, and subsequently incubated in TTIM containing alkyne-D-alanine (2 mM) (Boao Pharma, Boston) for 4 hr. Bacteria were washed with PBS and fixed for 15 min in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature. Fixed bacteria were resuspended in Click-iT Cell Reaction Buffer (Invitrogen) and copper-catalyzed click-chemistry was performed in the dark at room temperature for 60 min using the Click-iT Cell Reaction Kit (Invitrogen) with 10 µM azido-Alexa-Fluoro488 fluorophore (Invitrogen). Subsequently, bacteria were washed three times and attached to poly-(D) lysine coated coverslips. Bacterial cells were counterstained for LPS (red) with primary anti-Salmonella O poly A-1 and Vi rabbit antiserum (Becton, Dickinson and Co.) (1:10,000) and secondary anti-rabbit Alexa-Fluor594 (Invitrogen) (1:2,000) antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Peptidoglycan Remodeling in Salmonella Typhi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. Typhi wild type, ΔttsA and ΔycbB mutant strains were grown in TTIM for 24 hs, and subsequently incubated in TTIM containing alkyne-D-alanine (2 mM) (Boao Pharma, Boston) for 4 hs. To analyze peptidoglycan remodeling in bacteria that had been allowed to re-enter the cell cycle after growth to stationary phase, S. Typhi strains were grown to stationary phase in TTIM and labeled with alkyne-D-alanine as described above. Bacterial cultures were then split, casamino acids or eluent were added, and cultures were further grown for the indicated times (always in the presence of alkyne-D-alanine). In all cases, after the various growth conditions bacteria were washed with PBS and fixed for 15 min in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature. Fixed bacteria were resuspended in Click-iT Cell Reaction Buffer (Invitrogen) and copper-catalyzed click-chemistry was performed in the dark at room temperature for 30 min using the Click-iT Cell Reaction Kit (Invitrogen) with 10 μM azido-Alexa-Fluoro488 fluorophore (Invitrogen). Bacteria were then washed three times and attached to poly-(D) lysine coated coverslips. If applicable bacterial cells were counterstained for LPS (red) with primary anti-Salmonella O poly A-1 & Vi rabbit antiserum (Becton, Dickinson & Co.) (1:10,000) and secondary anti-rabbit Alexa-Fluor594 (Invitrogen) (1:2,000) antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Copper-catalyzed Click Labeling of Seedlings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Click-iT cell reaction kit (supplier: Invitrogen) was used for all copper-catalyzed “click” reactions. The labeling was carried out according to the procedure in the manual of Invitrogen except for the reaction time that was prolonged to 45 min. For the Alexa-fluor 488 fluorophore a concentration of 0.1 μM was found to be the most optimal. The excess of fluorophore was removed by washing the seedlings 4× in 2 mL half MS containing 0.05 % Tween 20. Duration of the sequential washings steps were respectfully 5, 10, 5 and 10 min. After washing the seedlings were stored for with a maximum time of 2 h in half MS (not containing Tween 20) before visualization by confocal microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Oocyte Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oocytes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 30 min, permeabilized for 15 min in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (1:100) against 4E-BP1(T70), 4E-BP1(T37/46), S6K(T389; Cell Signaling Technology), RPS6 (Santa Cruz), LMN A/C or α-tubulin (Sigma). After washing, the oocytes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with an Alexa Fluor conjugated antibodies (1:250; Molecular Probes). RNaseOut (500 U ml−1; Invitrogen) was used in all the buffers. For nascent protein synthesis specific stage (GV-0 h, NEBD-2 h, pro-MI-7 h, MII-12 h) oocytes were cultured in the methionine-free medium (Gibco) supplemented with 1% dialyzed fetal bovine serum (10,000 MW; Sigma) and 50 μM HPG for 30 min77 (link). HPG was detected by using Click-iT Cell Reaction Kit (Life Technologies). Chromosome spreads from mouse oocytes were prepared as previously described78 (link). ER was detected by 1 μM ER-Tracker (Green dye and Blue-White DPX dye for double staining; Molecular Probes) in M16 for 1 h. DAPI was used for chromosome staining (Vectashield). Nucleic acids were labelled by 50 nM SYTO14 (Molecular Probes) in M16 for 20 min then fixed by PFA and imaged. Samples were visualized using an inverted confocal microscope in 16 bit depth (TCS SP5; Leica). Images were assembled in Photoshop CS3 and quantified by Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Glycoprotein Labeling and Protein Synthesis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nascent glycoproteins were labeled using Click-It ManNAz (Life Technologies) and visualized using the Click-It Cell Reaction kit (Life Technologies). Biotinylated cell surface proteins were isolated using the Cell Surface Protein Isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and visualized by Western blot with Streptavidin-HRP (1:10,000). Rate of protein biosynthesis was assessed using the Click-It Plus OPP Alexa Fluor 488 Protein Synthesis Assay kit (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metabolic labeling of oocyte proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MII or equivalent control and Btg4-depleted oocytes were incubated in M2 medium supplemented with 50 µM HPG for 2 h. The oocytes were fixed for 30 min at 37°C in 100 mM HEPES (pH 7; titrated with KOH), 50 mM EGTA (pH 7; titrated with KOH), 10 mM MgSO4, 2% formaldehyde (methanol free) and 0.2% Triton X-100, based on previously published methods. Oocytes were permeabilized in PBS with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature and washed in PBS + 3% BSA. HPG was detected, using Click-iT cell reaction kit (Life Technologies). The mean cytoplasmic signal was measured in the middle section of each oocyte.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Nascent Protein Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293 cells (2.5 × 105 cells) were seeded in 24-well plate, cultured overnight, incubated with 20 μM OP-puro (Jena Bioscience) and RocA (0–3 μM) for 30 min, washed once with PBS, and then lysed with lysis buffer omitting DTT. The lysate was incubated with 1 μM IRDye800CW Azide (LI-COR Bioscience) for 30 min at 25°C, with Click-it cell reaction kit (Thermo Fisher scientific) according to manufacturer’s instruction and run on SDS-PAGE. The gel images were acquired and quantified by ODYSSEY CLx (LI-COR Biosciences). Subsequently, total protein on the gel was stained by GelCode Blue Stain Reagent (Thermo Fisher scientific), then quantified by ODYSSEY CLx (LI-COR Biosciences), and used for the normalization of OP-puro labeled nascent protein signal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Replication Recovery after HU Arrest

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Replication recovery after HU arrest was determined by 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation as follows. Cells (5 × 105) were seeded into T-25 flasks, incubated for 24 h, treated with 10 mM HU for 1 h or mock treated, washed three times with PBS (37°C), fresh growth medium was added and 10 μM EdU was added for 30 min at indicated times during recovery from HU. After the EdU pulse, cells were trypsinized, harvested, fixed with gradual addition of 70% chilled ethanol and stored at 4°C until further processing. Cells were processed using the Click-iT Cell Reaction Kit (Thermo Fisher) using manufacturer’s instructions, suspended in PBS containing 0.25 μl/ml SYTOX AADvanced and 80 μg/ml RNase A, incubated at 4°C overnight in the dark to allow the cell cycle dye to saturate and analyzed by flow cytometry as above. Single-molecule analysis of replication fork restart was performed by DNA fiber analysis as described (23 (link),28 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Nascent Protein Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 1 × 105 HEK293 cells were seeded in flat-bottom 24-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated overnight. The following day, the cells were cotransfected with the Cas13 variant-expressing plasmid (pXR series, 150 ng), the gRNA-expressing plasmid (pC016-gPsp-Control, 300 ng), and the luciferase reporter plasmid (psiCHECK2-PTGES3, 5 ng) using Lipofectamine 3000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, the cells were treated with 20 μM OP-puro (Jene Bioscience) for 30 min at 37 °C with 5% CO2, washed with PBS, lysed in OP-puro lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1% Triton X-100), and then clarified via centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The lysates were incubated with 1 μM IRDye800CW Azide (LI-COR Bioscience) for 30 min at 25 °C using a Click-it cell reaction kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and subsequently subjected to SDS‒PAGE. Images from the gels were acquired and quantified using an ODYSSEY CLx (LI-COR Biosciences). Total protein staining was subsequently performed on the gels using GelCode Blue Safe Protein Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The proteins were quantified using an ODYSSEY CLx (LI-COR Biosciences) and used for the normalization of OP-puro-labeled nascent protein signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!