To determine the differences between CM users and non-users, chi-square tests were used for categorical variables (gender, pre-injury education, living arrangements, and funding source), and independent sample
t-tests were used for continuous variables (age, severity of injury, activity limitations, and community integration). Predictor variables were then examined for collinearity. Relational concerns were addressed using Pearson correlation coefficients for continuous variables and Spearman’s rho coefficients for categorical variables. Most correlations were modest, with the highest correlation between the ALI and CIQ(
r = 0.43).
Sequential (hierarchical) logistic regression was used to create a model predicting CM use. The order in which the groups of variables – predisposing factors first, need factors second, and enablement factors last – were entered into the model was derived from Andersen and Davidson’s (2001) BMHSU. They suggest that need, as opposed to available resources, will explain most of the variance in health service use. Wald tests were used to determine the statistical significance of each regression coefficient in the model. Data were entered into the
SPSS statistical software package, version 11.0 which solves for the group coded 1 (i.e., CM users).
Baptiste B., Dawson D.R, & Streiner D. (2015). Predicting use of case management support services for adolescents and adults living in community following brain injury: A longitudinal Canadian database study with implications for life care planning. Neurorehabilitation, 36(3), 301-312.