The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

31 protocols using sugar pak 1 column

1

Soluble Sugars Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble sugars were extracted from flour samples (400 mg DW), following the method of [43 (link)]. Samples were homogenized in 20 mL of cold H2O, stirred for 30 min on ice, sonicated for 5 min and centrifuged (15,000 g, 20 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was collected, and extraction procedure was repeated with the pellet. Both supernatants were joined and cleared with nylon syringe filters (0.45 µm) before injection. Sugars separation was performed with an HPLC system coupled to a refractive index detector (Model 2414, Waters, MA, USA), using a SugarPak 1 column (300 mm length × 6.5 mm diameter, Waters) at 90 °C, with H2O as eluent (containing 50 mg EDTA-Ca L−1 H2O) and a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1. Standard curves were used for the quantification of each sugar.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Soluble Sugars in Leaf Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble sugars (sucrose, fructose, glucose, and sorbitol) were determined in approximately 400 mg of powdered frozen leaf material, based on the method previously described [63 (link)] with alterations as in [64 (link)]. Briefly, the samples were homogenized in 4 mL of cold H2O with 50 mg of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone, left to extract for 20 min on ice at 100 rpm and centrifuged (12,000× g, 5 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was boiled to denature the proteins (3 min), placed on ice (6 min) and centrifuged again. The obtained clear solution was then filtered (0.45 µm, nylon) before the injection of a 50 μL aliquot into an HPLC system equipped with a refractive index detector (Model 2414, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The separation of sugars was performed using a SugarPak 1 column (300 × 6.5 mm, Waters) at 90 °C, with H2O as the eluent (containing 50 mg EDTA-Ca L−1 H2O) and a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1 for 22 min. Standard curves were used for the quantification of each sugar.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Grape Sugar Extraction and HPLC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sugar extraction was performed in 40 g of pulp (removed from several grape berries at harvest) per sample (n = 3), according to [37 (link)], with minor modifications. Pulp weighted was liquified with 150 mL of cold ultrapure water and then adjusted to 200 mL. Samples were kept in ice, then transferred to ultrasounds (for 5 min), and later centrifuged (15,000× g, 15 min, 4 °C). Thereafter, the supernatant was removed to glass tubes and kept in ice. The pellet was then resuspended in ultrapure water and centrifuged in the same conditions. The supernatant, after the 2nd centrifuge, was transferred to glass tubes (ca. 20 mL) and immersed in a boiling bath (for 4 min). The tubes were then removed and put into ice (for 6 min), and, once cold, the samples were centrifuged (15,000× g, 20 min, 4 °C). Samples were injected in an HPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) system, coupled to a refractometric detector (Waters 2414), equipped with a SugarPak 1 column (Waters 6.5 × 300 mm) and pre-column (Wat 088141) with SugarPak II inserts (Wat 015209), after being filtered (nylon 0.45 mm) and stored. Ultrapure water containing 50 ppm calcium EDTA was used as the mobile phase, with a flow of 0.5 mL min−1, and an injection volume of 40 µL for each sample. Data were later analyzed with Breeze software, and quantification was performed based on the calibration curves of sucrose, glucose, and fructose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Soluble Grain Sugar Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble grain sugars were determined in approximately 400 mg of ground grain, based on the method of [46 (link)]. Briefly, the samples were homogenized in 10 mL of cold H2O, left to extract for 30 min on ice at 100 rpm, followed by 5 min in an ultrasonic bath and centrifuged (15,000× g, 20 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was collected, and the extraction procedure was repeated with the pellet. Both supernatants were combined and cleared with nylon syringe filters (0.45 µm) before injection. Sugars separation was performed with an HPLC system coupled to a refractive index detector (Model 2414, Waters, MA, USA), using a SugarPak 1 column (300 mm length × 6.5 mm diameter, Waters) at 90 °C, with H2O as eluent (containing 50 mg EDTA-Ca L−1 H2O) and a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1. Standard curves were used for the quantification of each sugar.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of Monosaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentrations of monosaccharide were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Agilent 1200 series, USA) with a refractive index detector (Shimadzu) and a Sugar-pak1 column (6.5 mm × 300 mm, Waters). The column was eluted at 80 °C with deionized water at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min (Mei et al. 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Soluble Sugars Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble sugars were extracted from frozen leaf and flowers samples (ca. 1 g), according to Damesin & Lelarge [30 ]. Samples were ground to a fine powder in a mortar using liquid nitrogen and immediately transferred to centrifuge tubes containing 5 mL of cold MQ water. Samples were then homogenised with a vortex (1 min) prior to sonication on ice (1 min), left for 20 min on ice to allow extraction and centrifuged (12 000 g, 5 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was boiled (3 min) to achieve protein denaturation, cooled in ice (6 min) and centrifuged again, as mentioned above. Clear samples were then further purified used nylon filters (0.45 mm). For sugars analysis 50 ml aliquots were injected in a HPLC system coupled to a refractive index detector (Model 2414; Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Sugars separation was performed using a Sugar-Pak 1 column (300 × 6.5 mm; Waters) at 90 °C, with H2O as eluent (containing 50 mg EDTA-Ca L−1 H2O) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1. Known sugar standards were used for sugars identification and quantification in samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Soluble Sugars and ABA in Strawberry Fruits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The soluble sugar content was determined using reverse phase HPLC (Agilent Technologies 1200 Series, RID1 A detector). The supernatant was fractionated using a Sugar‐Pak™1 column (6.5 × 300 mm, Waters) with 100% MilliQ water for 25 min at a flow rate of 0.4 mL per min. The column temperature was 80 °C, and the injection volume was 20 μL. Standard samples used were D‐(+) glucose, D‐(–) fructose and sucrose (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).
Half of the RNAi, control and OE strawberry fruits with fresh infections were used for sampling. According to the method described by Song et al. (2017), ABA was extracted and stored at –20 °C. An enzyme‐linked immune sorbent assay was used for ABA content determination as described by Zhang et al. (2009). The experiment was repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Soluble Sugars and Starch

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble sugars were determined in approximately 150 mg of powdered frozen material, based on the method of Damesin and Lelarge (2003) (link), as described in detail for coffee leaf material (Ramalho et al., 2013b (link)). Briefly, after processing the samples, a 50 µL aliquot was injected into an HPLC system equipped with a refractive index detector (Model 2414, Waters, East Lyme, CT, USA), and the separation of sugars was performed using a Sugar-Pak 1 column (300 x 6.5 mm, Waters) at 90°C, with H2O (containing 50 mg EDTA-Ca L-1 H2O) as the eluent, at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min-1. To resolve potential non-pure peaks, another 20 µL aliquot of each sample was injected through a DionexCarboPac PA1 analytical column (4 x250 mm, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to a DionexCarboPac PA1 Guard (4 × 50 mm) at 20°C. Ultrapure water and 300 mM NaOH were used as eluents (water from 0 to 50 min; NaOH from 50 to 65 min; and water from 65 to 80 min for re-equilibration), at a 1 mL min-1 flow rate. Standard curves were used for the quantification of each sugar.
Starch quantification was performed according to Stitt et al. (1978) (link) with some changes exactly as described for coffee leaf material (Ramalho et al., 2013b (link)), after the breakdown of starch to glucose, which was then enzymatically determined, with spectrophotometric readings at Abs340nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lactose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the extent of lactose hydrolysis by bG42-106, reactions were performed at 50°C or 60°C in 100 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 6.0) containing 200 g/L lactose and purified bG42-106 for various times and terminated by heating for 10 min at 100°C. Formation of galacto-oligosaccharides and other saccharides was quantified by HPLC through a 6.5 × 300 mm Sugar-Pak I column (Waters, Milford, MA). This column can separate oligosaccharide molecules of the same size but different linkage type. Samples were eluted in 50 mg/mL CaNaEDTA at 500 μL/min and 85°C. The yield of galacto-oligosaccharides (g/L) was calculated as [GOS] = [Lacinitial] – [Lacfinal] – [Glufinal] – [Galfinal] [29 (link)], in which GOS is the yield of galacto-oligosaccharides, Lacinitial is the initial amount of lactose, Lacfinal is the final amount of lactose, Glufinal is the final yield of glucose, and Galfinal is the final yield of galactose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Density, Protein, and HPLC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell density was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) with a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (TU-1901, Persee, Beijing, China). Cell dry weight (CDW, g/L) of E. coli was calculated from OD600 values using the experimentally determined correlation factor of 0.25 g cells (dry weight [DW])/liter for an OD600 of 1. Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method using bovine serum albumin as a standard. HPLC system (Agilent 1100 series, Hewlett-Packard) equipped with a refractive index detector and fitted with chromatographic column (Bio-Rad Aminex HPX-87H column or Waters Sugar-Pak I column) was used to qualitative and quantitative analysis of substrates and products.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!