The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eyeseecam

Manufactured by Interacoustics
Sourced in Denmark

The EyeSeeCam is a video-based eye tracking system designed for clinical and research applications. It is capable of accurately and reliably measuring eye movements and pupil size. The device provides real-time data on eye position and gaze direction.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using eyeseecam

1

Assessing Horizontal Vestibular-Ocular Reflex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The horizontal vestibular ocular reflex was assessed using the video head impulse test.8 (link) The video head impulse test was performed in the plane of the right and left horizontal semicircular canals using the EyeSeeCam system (Interacoustics, Eden Prairie, MN, USA), and testing methods have been previously published.8 (link) Individuals were judged able to complete testing if they could follow the instructions to calibrate the EyeSeeCam (i.e. follow the calibration laser point for video head impulse test to calibrate eye movements).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Vestibular Evaluation: vHIT and Balance Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All subjects underwent complete otomicroscopic and otoneurologic examination, including tympanometry, Dix-Hallpike and McClure maneuvers, and balance assessment by the Romberg, tandem walk, and Unterberger–Fukuda tests. We then performed the vHIT between February 2019 and March 2021 to assess the VOR, using a device with a high-speed infrared camera and accelerometer (EyeSeeCam® Interacoustics, Denmark). This provided data on the gain values for the six semicircular canals, together with the presence or absence of saccades. Children were asked to fix their sight on a dot placed on the wall 1 m away, with cartoon stickers used to attract the attention of children aged 3–6 years old. All data were collected by the same examiner. Tests considered invalid due to a lack of co-operation, excessive blinking, involuntary cervical muscle contraction, or any other factor that diminished reproducibility were discarded. Consistent with the protocol reported by Zamaro et al., artifacts or invalid impulses due to high or low test velocity were also excluded [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Vestibular Function Assessment in Healthy Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 14 healthy volunteers were recruited (8 females; age: 50–60 years, mean age 55.1 ± 3.0 years). All participants were interviewed via telephone to exclude previous medical history with dizziness, neurological or psychiatric disorders of any kind, and use of potential neuromodulating medication. Only right‐handed volunteers according to the 10‐item inventory of the Edinburg test (Oldfield, 1971) and nonsmokers were included in the study. Cervical VEMP, ocular VEMP (Curthoys, 2017) (Eclipse, Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark), and video head impulse test (EyeSeeCam, Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark) were carried out prior to the PET examinations to ensure normal function of the vestibular organ (Halmagyi et al., 2017). All 14 healthy volunteers were included in the study and underwent three 18F‐FDG‐PET scans. Informed oral and written consent were obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Central Region of Denmark Research Ethics Committee (no: 1‐10‐72‐135‐16). The results of the study are reported in agreement with the STROBE statement (von Elm et al., 2014).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Video Head Impulse Test Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
vHIT was performed with a video-oculography device (Interacoustics, EyeSeeCam, Denmark). The subject was instructed to maintain the fixation on an earth-fixed target, which is usually straight ahead. Experienced otologists An experienced laboratory technician delivered at least 20 brief, abrupt, and unpredictable head impulses per side (10–20° angle, duration 150–200 ms, peak velocity of >150°/s). The VOR gain was defined as the ratio of the eye velocity (°/s) over the head velocity (°/s). Individual VOR gains were automatically calculated using the device software. vHIT testing was considered to be abnormal for horizontal canal if VOR gain at 60 ms was <0.8 (18 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Vestibular Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peripheral vestibular evaluation first included the head impulse test (HIMP) and suppression head im-pulse (SHIMP) in the horizontal plan using vHIT (Eye-seecam, Interacoustics, Middlefart, Denmark). For both of these tests, gain and saccades were analyzed. A VOR gain lower than 0.79 with catch-up saccades was considered abnormal in the horizontal plane (Curthoys et al). 1 Saccades were categorized as either covert (if they occurred during head movement) or overt (if they occurred after head movement). Second, the participant received an evaluation of both the saccule and utricule using cVEMP and oVEMP (Eclipse EP-25/VEMP Interacoustics). The cVEMP and oVEMP results were interpreted according to the presence or absence of a replicable waveform using a 500-Hz tone burst at 95 dBnHL (approximately 125 peSPL) (Hsu et al). 9
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Assessing Horizontal Semicircular Canal Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HSC function was assessed using caloric reflex testing and vHIT. For bilateral caloric reflex testing, the patient was placed supine with their heads lifted 30° to place the HSC in the vertical position. Each external auditory canal was alternately irrigated with a constant flow of cold (30°C) and warm (44°C) water for ≈40 seconds to induce caloric nystagmus. Nystagmus was recorded using infrared videonystagmography (Interacoustics, VNG VO425). The sum of the maximum slow phase velocity (SPVmax, in °/s) at 30°C and 44°C after irrigation of the healthy ear was used as the outcome measure. For vHIT, the patient’s head was rapidly (velocity between 150 and 250 °/s) rotated (10° to 20°) in the horizontal plane. Compensating eye movements were measured using videography (Interacoustics EyeSeeCam). The VOR gain measured at 60 ms (Gain60 ms) when rotating the head toward the healthy side was used as the outcome measure. Because vHIT was not implemented until 2016 (2 years after caloric reflex testing was implemented) and because patients with neck problems did not undergo vHIT, not all patients included in this study underwent assessment by both caloric reflex testing and vHIT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Vestibular Function Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vestibular function testing included video head impulse tests (VHITs) and cVEMPs. The VHIT (EyeSeeCam, Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark or ICS impulse, Otometrics, Taastrup, Denmark) is performed by applying rapid horizontal head thrusts randomly to each side, with gaze fixation (5 (link)). The VHIT outcome for the lateral semicircular canals was determined by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) median gain value (LVOR gain) and compensatory saccades (covert or overt). VOR vestibulopathy (uni- or bilateral) was defined as an ipsilateral gain value below 0.70 or presence of saccades (5 (link)). Complete loss of VOR function was defined as a gain value <0.25. Gain values below zero were defined as 0. CVEMPs evaluate the vestibulo-cervical reflex (and thus the function of the saccule in the vestibule of the inner ear) and were performed by applying air-conducted click sounds of 100 dB nHL to the external ear canal and recording myogenic potentials evoked in the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle (Eclipse, Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark) (6 (link)). The outcome was evaluated binarily: presence or absence of a potential. VEMP vestibulopathy (uni- or bilateral) was defined as absence of an ipsilateral potential.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Assessing Vestibular Function Using vHIT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
vHIT was performed using EyeSeeCam (Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark). Patients were in the sitting position and wore an eye mask. They were instructed to fix their eyes on a target at eye level and at a distance of 1.5 m. The examiner stood behind the patient while holding the patient’s head between both hands. Subsequently, 20 head impulses were delivered in each canal plane in a brief, rapid, passive manner, with the angular velocity being 150°–250°/s for the horizontal canal impulses. The vHIT software was used to record the average slow phase vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain values (the ratio of eye velocity to head velocity at 60 s), with an VOR gain of the horizontal canal <0.8 indicating abnormal vHIT (14 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Using vHIT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
vHIT was performed using EyeSeeCam (Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark) to assess vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). vHIT evaluates VOR by testing all three pairs of SCCs, and calculates the average gain value and the asymmetry ratio of the two semicircular canals in the conjugate plane for each semicircular canal. Reduced SCC function is defined as a horizontal SCC gain less than 0.8 and a vertical SCC gain less than 0.7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiplanar Video Head Impulse Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The horizontal vHIT and the vHIT in the Right-Anterior-Left-Posterior (RALP) and Left-Anterior-Right-Posterior (LARP) canal planes were performed using the Video-Head Impulse Test device from Otometrics at center 1 and 2 (Otometrics, Taastrup, Denmark). At center 3, horizontal vHIT was performed using the Eye-SeeCam (Interacoustics, Munich, Germany). The testing method was described previously (45 (link), 46 (link)). In brief, the technician stood behind the subject (who was sitting on a static chair) and held their head firmly without touching the goggles. The subject was instructed to maintain visual fixation on an earth-fixed target at a distance of 2 m at centers 1 and 2 and 1.8 m at center 3. Head impulses comprised fast unpredictable, low-amplitude (±20°) head movements in the horizontal plane (all three centers, peak head velocity > 150°/s) and in the RALP and LARP planes (center 1 and 2, peak head velocity > 100°/s). The Otometrics system defines the VOR gain as the ratio of the area under the eye velocity curve to the area under the head velocity curve from the impulse onset until the head velocity drops to zero again (47 (link)). The inter-acoustics system divides the eye and head velocity at a certain point in time (around 60 ms after impulse onset) (46 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!