The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Grass s88

Manufactured by Natus
Sourced in United States

The Grass S88 is a versatile laboratory instrument designed for electrophysiological recording and stimulation. It provides a reliable and stable platform for researchers to conduct various experiments and analyses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using grass s88

1

Bipolar Platinum Electrode Nerve Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two bipolar platinum J-cuff electrodes (manufactured in house) (Foldes et al., 2011 (link)) were positioned along the nerve approximately 1.5 cms apart, as illustrated in Figure 2. The proximal electrode was used to deliver an electrical test stimulus from an isolated square-pulse stimulator (Grass S88, Grass Technologies, West Warwick, RI, USA) to maximally excite the gastrocnemius muscle. The distal electrode, positioned between the proximal electrode and the muscle, was used to test KHFAC block and deliver the trains of sinusoidal KHFAC from a voltage-controlled function generator (Model 395, Wavetek, now Willtek Communications GmbH, Ismaning, Germany). A LabView® program controlled the function generator to produce the trains of KHFAC in random sequences at the desired amplitudes and cycle counts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gastric Smooth Muscle Mechanical Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were performed in vitro with strips of both circular (n = 12) and longitudinal (n = 13) muscles from human gastric fundus and their mechanical activities were recorded as changes in isometric force. These experiments were conducted using standard organ bath techniques, as previously described in another study by our laboratory [26 (link),27 (link)].
Electrical field stimulation (EFS) of intramural nerves was carried out by giving stimuli of various frequencies and durations (0.3 ms in trains of 1–20 Hz for 1–20 s, 150 V) which were applied via the two platinum ring electrodes attached to each strip. The electrodes were connected to a GRASS S88 (GRASS Instruments, Quincy, MA, USA) stimulator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electrical Stimulation of Sciatic Nerve

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sciatic nerve from both legs were surgically exposed for electrode placement. While one leg was left unstimulated (basal/sham control), the other leg was subjected to electrical stimulation using a Grass S88 pulse generator for 15 min of contractions (train rate, 1/s; train duration, 500 ms; pulse rate, 100 Hz, duration, 0.1 ms at 2–7 V)57 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quadriceps Muscle Stimulation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects were seated on a computerized controlled dynamometer (KinCom II, Chattecx Corporation, Chattanooga, Tennessee) with their knees flexed to 90° and the lateral femoral condyle aligned with the axis of the dynamometer. The tibia and thigh of the leg tested, pelvis and trunk were stabilized by the force transducer pad, thigh strap, seat belt, and straps crisscrossing the torso. Electrical stimulation was delivered by a Grass S88 stimulator equipped with a Grass model SIU8T stimulus isolation unit (Grass Instruments, West Warwick, Rhode Island). Two self-adhesive surface electrodes (7.6 × 12.7 cm; Conmed, Utica, New York) were placed in the usual manner (proximal electrode placed over the rectus femoris and distal electrode over the vastus medialis portions) to allow stimulation of the quadriceps femoris muscle [Stackhouse et al., 2000 (link)]. The stimulator was driven by a computer using customized software (Labview 4.0.1, National Instruments, Austin, Texas) to control the timing parameters of each stimulation pattern. Forces were recorded at a sampling rate of 200 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electrical Stimulation of Brain Regions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrical stimulation was delivered to the IL or PrL through the implanted concentric bipolar electrode (Grass S88, Grass Instruments). Stimulation consisted of single pulses (0.2 Hz, 0.1–0.9 mA, 0.2 ms duration) or trains (10–40 Hz, 10 pulses, 0.1–0.9 mA, 0.1–0.2 ms duration).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Electrical Stimulation of Fish Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fish larvae were subjected electrical stimulation at room temperature using a custom-built electric stimulation set-up (ESS) (Fig. 1A). To minimize damage to the fish, the ESS consists of two silver electrodes (0.5 mm ∅, 99.9%, Arcos Organics, New Jersey, U.S.A.) arrayed parallel and 10 mm apart passing through the drilled holes of a 6-well tissue culture plate or a 60 mm ∅ petri dish. Chambers with electrodes were filled with 2% agarose gel, such that the silver electrodes are completely within the gel. A circular well of volume 0.5 mL was created by removing the agarose in the centre of the chamber between the two electrodes. Fish are placed carefully into the well with desired orientation. Care was taken not to expose the electrodes to the fish swimming in the well. The electrodes are connected to a stimulator (Grass S-88, Grass Instruments, U.S.A) that generated square wave pulse trains of indicated lengths. Polarity of electrodes was reversed between pulse trains to avoid electrolysis. A range of stimulation regimes was tested, with the aim of attaining a brief twitch response, and all experiments shown used a train of 200 20 V pulses, with 0.5 ms pulse duration (100 ms total train duration) once every 5 seconds (Fig. 1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Sciatic Nerve Stimulation and EMG Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were anesthetized by isoflurane. EMG recordings were made using procedures modified from Arnold et al, 2015 [98 ]. The sciatic nerve was stimulated at the proximal hind limb above the site of transection using two 28 G monopolar electrodes (DTM Series, Electrode Store). Stimulation was provided by a Grass S88 (Quincy, MA) using square-wave pulses of 0.1 ms duration and intensity ranging from 1–10 mA. Recordings were made using one fine ring electrode (reference) placed around the ankle and a second 28 G monopolar electrode (active) placed mid-belly in the TA. A ground electrode was placed around the tail to allow for differential amplification of the CMAP waveform (BDA-H-4, WPI, Inc). Signals were acquired digitally and analyzed using Spike2 software (CED, Inc, Cambridge, UK). Stimulation intensity was increased until there was no more increase in CMAP amplitude. To ensure supramaximal stimulation, stimulation intensity was increase to ~120% of maximal response. EMG recording were made from both the left control non-denervated TA and on the side of transection (Right). EMG CMAP results are presented as ratio of the recordings from left and right sides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quadriceps Muscle Stimulation and Fatigue Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bipolar self-adhesive neuromuscular stimulation electrodes (7 × 10 cm) were placed over the distal-medial and proximal-lateral portion of the quadriceps muscle group, as reported previously [17 (link)]. Stimulation pulses were delivered using a Grass S88 stimulator with a Grass Model SIU8T stimulus isolation unit (Grass Technologies, West Warwick, RI). Stimulation pulses were 450 μs in duration and delivered at 100 Hz for 100 ms (10 pulses); voltage was set at 125 V. Participants were familiarized with maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). During MVIC testing, the burst of stimulation was applied. CAR was calculated: MVIC torque/(MVIC torque + Stimulation). The 30-repetition fatigue test (CAR30) was considered central fatigue. CAR was measured on only 40 of the subjects because data was collected on only the last 50 subjects entered in the study and because of inability of 10 subjects to complete protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Investigating Prefrontal-Basolateral Amygdala Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MgN and PFC were stimulated via concentric bipolar electrodes controlled by a pulse stimulator (Grass S88, Grass Instruments, Warwick, RI, USA). LFPs as a result of single stimulation (0.2 Hz, 0.3–1.0 mA, 0.2 ms duration) of the PFC or MgN were recorded in the BLA, and a stimulation intensity of approximately half of the amplitude measured at 1.0 mA was used for subsequent recording protocols. When specified, train stimulations of the PFC occurred at 20 Hz (10 pulses/train, 50 ms inter-stimulus interval, 0.1–0.7 mA). To understand the degree of PFC influence on BLA activity, the stimulation intensity of 0.1 mA for the PFC train was also used to assess minimal BLA responses to PFC stimulation. MgN single stimulation occurred 100 ms following PFC train. The duration of the stimulation protocol was five seconds. Each stimulation protocol was run a minimum of 20 sweeps (trials). Each stimulation intensity was then averaged and analyzed. The order of stimulation protocol (0 mA PFC train, 0.1 mA PFC train, 50% PFC train) was counterbalanced between rats in all groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Intracellular Recordings of Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All intracellular recordings were performed on wandering third instar larvae as described previously (Choudhury et al., 2016 (link)). Briefly, HL3 buffer containing 1.5 mm Ca2+ was used for larval dissection. Recordings from muscle 6 of A2 hemisegment were performed using sharp glass electrodes having a resistance of 20–25 MΩ. Miniature excitatory junction potentials (mEJPs) were recorded for 60 s, followed by recordings of EJPs at 1 Hz stimulation. For High-frequency recording, nerves were stimulated at 10 Hz, and EJPs were recorded for 5 min. For recording EJPs, stimulation pulse was delivered using Grass S88 stimulator (Grass Instruments, Astro-Med, Inc). The signals were amplified using Axoclamp 900A, digitized using Digidata 1440A, and acquired using pClamp10 software (Molecular Devices). Muscles with resting membrane potential between −60 and −75 mV were used for analysis. The data were analyzed using the Mini Analysis program (Synaptosoft, Decatur).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!