The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cpsil 88 column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, France

The CPSIL-88 column is a capillary gas chromatography (GC) column designed for the separation and analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). It features a cyanopropylsiloxane stationary phase, which provides excellent separation of cis and trans isomers, as well as short- and long-chain fatty acids.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using cpsil 88 column

1

Lipid Extraction and Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total lipids from cortex, plasma and livers were extracted using Folch’s procedure [41 (link)]. Boron trifluoride in methanol was used for transmethylation [42 (link)]. Hexane was used to extract fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) and dimethyl acetals (DMAs). Analyses were performed on a GC Trace 1310 (Thermo Scientific, Illkirch, France) gas chromatograph (GC) using a CPSIL-88 column (100 m × 0.25 mm inside diameter, film thickness 0.20 μm; Agilent, CA, USA). This device was coupled to a flame ionization detector (FID). The configuration was: inlet pressure of hydrogen 210 kPa, oven temperature 60 °C for 5 min + 165 °C at 15 °C per min and upholding for 1 min, +225 °C at 2 °C per min and upholding at 225 °C for 17 min. The injector and the detector were maintained at 250 °C. Comparisons with commercial and synthetic standards enabled the identification of FAMEs and DMAs. The ChromQuest 5.0 version 3.2.1 software (Thermo Scientific, Illkirch, France) was used to process the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fatty Acid Profile Analysis in Milk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Profiles of the FAs still bound to the TAG in each processed milk and digested samples were obtained based on a modified version of the procedure described by Tunick et al. [12 (link)]. Briefly, the FAs were converted to methyl esters (FAME) by reacting with sodium methoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) (free FAs were not detected by this method) and 0.5 μL samples were injected into a Trace 1300 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector set at 270 °C (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and a CP-Sil 88 column (100 m × 0.25 mm; Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Helium flow was 1.0 mL/min and the injector was 20 mL/min split flow with the inlet temperature at 250 °C. The initial oven temperature was 80 °C and was increased at 4 °C/min to 220 °C and held for 5 min; the oven temperature was then increased at 4 °C/min to 240 °C and held for the remaining 10 min: The instrument’s software was used to calculate percentages of FA. The internal standard added before esterification was glyceryl trinonanoate (Sigma-Aldrich), and reference standards consisted of 4–24-carbon methyl esters and conjugated methyl linoleate (Nu-Chek-Prep, Elysian, MN, USA). Data collection started with caprylic acid (8:0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Plasma Phospholipid Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cases and controls from both cohorts were processed within the same batch, and laboratory personnel were blinded to participant information. To determine fatty acid concentration, 10 µg C15 phosphatidylcholine internal standard (Nuchek Prep, Inc.) was added to 200 µL plasma and phospholipids were extracted using a Folch method as previously described (43 (link), 44 (link)). Briefly, lipids were extracted from the plasma sample and total phospholipids were separated by spotting the samples on a heat-activated silica gel “G” TLC plate (Analtech) and developing plate in a chamber with solvent containing 80:20:1 petroleum ether:diethyl ether:acetic acid. Methyl ester bands were prepared by a mixture of BF3(boron trifluoride) and hexane at 100°C. Total phospholipid fatty acids were separated by automated GLC 7890A (Agilent Technologies) on a CP-Sil 88 column (100 m × 0.25 mm; Agilent) (45 (link)). To control for variations between batches of samples, control measures were used in addition to the internal standard (concentration = 20 μg/mL), and individual GC peaks were identified and validated against phospholipid standards (GLC-502 and GLC-643) from NuChek Prep, Inc., which were run for each batch to verify retention time and quantification for each individual fatty acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fatty Acid Profiling of Muscle Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total lipids were extracted from freeze-dried muscle samples (0.5~1 g) using Folch liquid (chloroform:methanol = 2:1 by vol.). Then, methanolic KOH was added, and the samples were blow dried with nitrogen before boron trifluoride and normal heptane were added sequentially. After the addition of saturated salt water, the supernatant was taken, and anhydrous sodium sulfate was added. Fatty acid methyl eaters were subjected to analysis using gas chromatography (GC-14B, Shimadzu, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China) with CP-Sil 88 column (0.25 mm × 50 m × 0.20 μm, Agilent Technologies, Beijing, China). A standard (47015-U, Supelco, Shanghai, China) was used to identify potential fatty acid components in each sample. Fatty acid composition (%) = 100 × (peak area of a certain fatty acid/peak area of total fatty acid).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Plasma and Liver Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma total fatty acids were analyzed for controls (baseline [0 weeks], 10 samples) and in mice fed with corn oil 30 µL/mouse/day for 12–16 weeks (22 samples) or mineral oil 30 µL/mouse/day for 12–16 weeks (26 samples). The plasma samples were spiked with tricosanoic acid (C23:0) and extracted using the BUME method (Löfgren et al., 2012 (link)). Fatty acid methyl esters were produced by acid-catalyzed transesterification and were analyzed using an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent 5975C mass spectrometer. For separation, an Agilent DB-23 column was used. In total, 17 fatty acids were analyzed and quantified against the C23:0 fatty acid internal standard.
Liver fatty acids were extracted at 16 weeks from homogenized liver samples (500 µg protein per sample) by a Bligh and Dyer protocol (Bligh and Dyer, 1959 (link)). Approximately 10–20 mg samples of the different diets were used for dietary fatty acid composition analyses. After derivatization to fatty acid methyl esters, both liver and dietary fatty acids were analyzed by gas chromatography using a CP-Sil 88 column (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) as described previously (Princen et al., 1995 (link)). In total, 17 fatty acids were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fatty Acid and Tocopherol Analysis in Hempseed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fatty acid (FA) profile and tocopherols content were analysed in both the dehulled hempseeds (from which oil was extracted by the Soxhlet method) and in the oil extracted by SSP. The FA profile was determined according to the AOAC official method 41.1.30 [31 ], using an Agilent-6890N gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a CP-SIL88 Column (100 m × 0.2 mm i.d. × 0.36 μm) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) following the method described by Rebolleda et al. (2012) [32 (link)]. An internal standard quantification method was applied using FA chromatographic standards (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) and methyl tricosanoate as the internal standard.
The tocopherols content (mg/g) was determined according to the IUPAC 2.432 official method (IUPAC, 1992), following the procedure reported by Rebolleda et al., 2012 [32 (link)]. An Agilent HPLC series 1100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with ACE 5 silica column (250 mm × 4.6 mm) was used for the analysis. The eluent consisted of n-hexane/2-propanol, flowing at a rate of 0.8 mL/min. Individual compounds of α-, β-, γ- and δ-tocopherols were identified and quantified using an external calibration curve of the corresponding standard compounds. The determination of fatty acids and tocopherols content was made at least in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fatty Acid Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography as reported by Cui et al. [24 (link)]. Fatty acids were separated on a 7890 A series Agilent system GC-FID with a CP-Sil 88 column (100 m × 0.25 mm 0.2 µm, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were identified and quantified by comparing the retention times of FAMEs standards and calculating the relative peak areas, respectively. The standard mixture of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs, GLC-463) was purchased from NuChek−Prep (Elysian, SP, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fatty Acid Profiling of Extracted Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracted oil (Section 2.2) was dissolved in chloroform and fatty acids were derivatized to methyl esters (FAME) using transesterification procedure with 2% (v/v) sulfuric acid in methanol [16 (link)]. A gas chromatograph (model 6890 N, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) fitted with a CP-Sil 88 column (100 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.2 μm, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and flame ionization detector were used in quantifying FAME. A temperature gradient program was used in the oven, and hydrogen was used as the carrier gas (constant pressure 206.8 kPa; nominal initial flow rate 2.1 mL min−1 [16 (link)]). The fatty acid composition was calculated as weight percentages using theoretical response factors [17 (link)]. Analyses were performed in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fatty Acid Profiling of Feed and Milk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acid methyl esters of lipid in feed and milk samples were prepared according to standard laboratory methods (Shingfield et al., 2003) . Total FAME profile was determined by using a gas chromatograph (6890N, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) equipped with a CP-Sil 88 column (100 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.2 µm film thickness, Agilent Technologies) and flame ionization detector with a temperature gradient program (Shingfield et al., 2003) and a pressure program (Leskinen et al., 2016) . Identification was based on retention time comparisons with authentic FAME standards (Larodan Fine Chemicals AB, Malmö, Sweden; Nu-Chek Prep Inc., Elysian, MN; Sigma-Aldrich) and verified by GC-MS (6890 and 5973, Agilent Technologies) in positive electron ionization mode for FAME and corresponding 4,4-dimethyloxazoline derivatives (Shingfield et al., 2003) . Distribution of CLA isomers in milk was determined by silver ion HPLC using 4 ChromSpher 5 Lipids columns (250 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm particle size, Agilent Technologies) in series without recycling of fractions (Shingfield et al., 2003) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Milk Fat Fatty Acid Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Milk fat for long-chain FA determination was extracted using the methods previously published by Feng et al. (2004) and a milk lipid methylation process was assessed using the methods described by Christie (1982) with modifications occurring as described by Chouinard et al. (1999) . Long chain FA methyl esters (FAME) in hexane were prepared from milk fat by the method of Feng et al. (2004) . Individual FAME was determined using a GC (Hewlett-Packard -HP 7820A GC System, Agilent Technologies Inc. Germany) fitted with a CP-Sil 88 column (100 m x 0.25 mm i.d. x 0.2 μm film, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA) as described previously by Lock et al. (2006) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!