The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using leica refine detection kit

1

Immunohistochemical Detection of HSV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue and hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were studied in both cases. Immunohistochemical studies on paraffin-embedded material were performed, using antibodies for herpes simplex virus (HSV) I and II following fixation in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The rabbit polyclonal HSV I and II antibodies from Cell Marque (CMC36111031, CMC36211031, Rocklin, California) were used at a dilution of 1 : 200 for HSV I and 1 : 50 for HSV 2. Immunostaining was performed using the Leica Bond-Max automation system and Leica Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems, Bannockburn, IL). The approximately 3-hour protocol included online deparaffinization and low-pH epitope retrieval for 10 minutes, incubation with primary antibodies for 15 minutes, postprimary IgG linker reagent (rabbit anti-mouse IgG) for 8 minutes, polymer anti-rabbit HRP IgG for 8 minutes, and DAB as the chromogen for 10 minutes, followed by 5-minute hematoxylin counterstaining. A positive control was run with each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cardiac and Renal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded hearts and kidneys were sectioned, and 5-µm-thick sections were used for detection of CD31 (Cell Marque, clone: Monoclonal, dilution: 1:100, USA), TGF-β (ThermoFisher Scientific, clone: Monoklonal, dilution: 1:100, USA), VEGF (Spring Bioscience, clone: N/A, dilution: 1:100, USA) expressions by immunohistochemistry via the Leica Bond-Max automation and Leica Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems, USA). Analyses were performed blindly by a histologist. The brown precipitate formed due to the DAB used during the immunohistochemistry showed a positive reaction for the primary antibodies. Semi-quantitative HSCORE analysis was used to evaluate immunohistochemical results when comparing the groups. The following equation was used to calculate HSCORE: HSCORE = ΣPi (i+1), where Σ is the intensity of labelling with a value of 1, 2 or 3, (weak, moderate, or strong, respectively) and Pi is the percentage of labelled cells for each intensity, varying from 0% to 100%18 (link),19 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Ki-67 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining was performed in a Leica Bond Max automated system (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) using the Leica‐Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems, DS9800). Briefly, after de‐paraffinization, rehydration, and antigen retrieval, the sections were then incubated with Ki‐67 antibody (1:200, Abcam, ab16667) for 30 min at room temperature, followed by detection using the DAB system. Ki67‐positive cells were counted in 5 fields/section under a microscope (400 x), and the number of cells/field was shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of Sponge Slices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining of sponge slices was performed using a Leica Staining Robot with robotic antigen retrieval for F4/80 using trypsin solution (0.5 mg/mL in PBS, 10 min, 37 °C), or for αSMA manual antibody retrieval using a pressure cooker under standard conditions (citrate NCL pH 6 buffer); antigen retrieval was not performed for CD31. For F4/80 and αSMA, samples were blocked (5 min) with hydrogen peroxide solution from the Leica Refine Detection Kit (Leica Biosystems, Milton Keynes, UK) followed by serum block (30 min; F4/80, Immpress anti-rat (mouse absorbed) kit (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK); αSMA, Mouse on Mouse Abcam Kit (Cambridge, UK)). Thereafter, samples were incubated with primary antibody (30 min; F4/80 1:300 (eBiosciences, Hatfield, UK); αSMA 1:4000 (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK)) prior to incubation with polymer (30 min, F4/80 Impress Kit as above; αSMA as above). For CD31 a Leica Refine Kit (as above) was used, which included a hydrogen peroxide block (5 min), primary antibody (120 min, 1:200 (Abcam)) and polymer incubation (15 min). Immunostaining was completed with incubation with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (10 min) and counterstaining with haematoxylin (5 min), both from the Leica Refine Kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Xenograft Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subcutaneous xenograft tumors were prepared for IHC analysis. IHC was performed in a Leica Bond Max automated system (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) using the Leica-Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems, DS9800). Briefly, after deparaffinization, rehydration, and antigen retrieval, the sections were incubated with an anti-Ki-67 antibody (1 : 200, Abcam) and an anti-NF-κB p65 antibody (1 : 100, Abcam) for 30 min at room temperature. After washing, the sections were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, visualized with diaminobenzidine, and counterstained with hematoxylin. The stained slides were observed under a microscope (Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiplex Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One rectangular tumor sample derived from each surgical specimen was assembled into multitumor blocks containing as many as 40 tissue samples as previously described [27 (link)]. The size of the tumor sample was estimated to exceed the size of a single 0.6-mm2 core by a factor of 10 to 15.
Immunohistochemistry staining with ALCAM, ALDH1, SALL4 and PD-L1 antibodies was performed using the Leica Bond-Max automation and Leica Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems, Bannockburn, IL). The protocols are detailed in Table 1 and include previously published (SALL4 and PD-L1) immunohistochemical procedures [25 (link)–27 (link)]. For the sequential double staining, additional antibody was depicted by Fast Red chromogen. According to the past report, the immunoreactivity of ALCAM (cell membranous), PD-L1 (cell membranous and/or cytoplasmic), ALDH1 (cytoplasmic), and SALL4 (nuclear) was evaluated with a detection cut-off of 5% [25 (link),26 (link)]. Expression of PD-L1 in tumor-associated immune cells (TAIs, mostly macrophages) was also evaluated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PD-L1 and JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein lysates were subjected to electrophoresis on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Blots were incubated using primary anti-PD-L1, JAK2, pJAK2 (Y1007/1008), STAT1, pSTAT1 (Y701) (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), IRF-1, EBNA1, and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) antibodies. Blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology) and visualized using ECL (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using the Leica BOND-MAX autostainer and Leica Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems, Melbourne, Australia) using primary PD-L1 antibody (1:50, clone E-7, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemistry Protocol for Colorectal Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies used for immunohistochemistry are summarized in supplementary material, Table S1, available online. All immunostaining was performed with Leica Bond‐Max automation and the Leica Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems, Bannockburn, IL, USA) as previously reported 10, 13, 16. Immunoreactivity of CD274 (membrane and/or cytoplasm) and ALCAM (membrane) was evaluated with a detection cut‐off of 5% according to our previous reports 10, 13. Representative photographs for CD274‐positive metastatic CRC cases are shown in Figure 1. CDX2 immune reactivity (nucleus) was classified into two categories; positive (same or stronger than the normal colonic mucosa) and down‐regulated (weaker than the normal colonic mucosa or loss of expression). “Stem‐like” immunophenotype was defined by CDX2‐down‐regulation and ALCAM‐positivity (representative photographs in supplementary material, Figure S1). Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) was performed as previously reported 10, 13. A threshold of ≥ 50 positive TAIs/HPF was used to define CD4, CD8, and FOXP3‐positive cases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemistry Protocol for Tissue Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed using a Leica Bond-Max (Leica Biosystems, Bannockburn, IL, USA) with a Leica Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems). Antibodies and conditions for immunohistochemistry are shown in Supplementary Table S7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mesothelin Immunohistochemistry Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed using the Leica Bond-Max automation and Leica Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems, Bannockburn, IL). The conditions for immunostaining have been summarized in Table 5. Signals were visualized by DAB. Mesothelin immunoreactivity (luminal/membranous or cytoplasmic) was evaluated with a detection cut-off of 5%. To compare the mesothelin positivity in small rectangular tissue samples on the tissue array and the corresponding larger whole-slide donor samples, 31 cases were selected for comparative immunohistochemical analysis. The results showing a high concordance are illustrated in Supplementary Figure 2. Immunohistochemistry of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were performed as previously reported [26 (link), 27 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!