Elemental analyses of C, H, and N was performed on a Vario EL III elemental analyzer. Hydrogen NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker-400 spectrometer with Me4Si as an internal standard. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of the PCPs were recorded on a Rigaku D/max-2400 X-ray powder diffractometer (Japan) with Cu-Kα (λ = 1.5405 Å) radiation. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out at a ramp rate of 5 °C/min in a nitrogen flow with a Mettler-Toledo TGA/SDTA851 instrument. FT-IR spectra were recorded using KBr pellets on a JASCO FT/IR-430 spectrometer. Gas adsorption isotherms were obtained on a BELSORP-max adsorption instrument (BEL Japan Inc.) using a volumetric technique. The initial outgassing of the sample was carried out under high vacuum (P < 10−2 Pa, T = 120 °C) for 32 h to remove solvated water molecules. The CO2 adsorption isotherms for desolvated compounds were collected in a relative pressure range from 10 to 1.0 × 105 Pa.
D max 2400 x ray powder diffractometer
Manufactured by Rigaku
Sourced in Japan, United States
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
Ft ir 430 spectrometer, by Jasco (1 mentions)
Tga sdta851 instrument, by Mettler Toledo (1 mentions)
400 spectrometer, by Bruker (1 mentions)
Jsm 6510lv scanning electron microscope, by JEOL (1 mentions)
Vertex 70 ftir spectrometer, by Bruker (1 mentions)
Escalab 250xi x ray photoelectron spectrometer, by Thermo Fisher Scientific (1 mentions)
Optima 2000 dv, by PerkinElmer (1 mentions)
Ultra 55, by Zeiss (1 mentions)
Tga dsc 3, by Mettler Toledo (1 mentions)
6 protocols using d max 2400 x ray powder diffractometer
1
Characterization of Porous Coordination Polymers
2
Comprehensive Characterization of Carbon Blacks
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
CB samples of approximately 0.5 g were degassed for 3 h at 125 °C. The surface morphology of the CB samples was analyzed in a JSM-6510LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at a 20 kV. The BET-SSA and pore size analysis were determined using N2 as the adsorbate at 77 K and relative pressure of 0.05–0.20, for which a V-Sorb 2800P BET-SSA and pore size analyzer (Gold APP Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used. All CB samples were scanned with an Escalab 250 Xi X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA) to investigate the chemical state of the main elements and the functional groups on the surface. The chemical bonds were identified by published references and the National Institute of Standards and Technology database (https://srdata.nist.gov/xps/ ). The mineral species of the CB samples were identified using a D/max2400 X-ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku Co., Ltd., Wilmington, NC, USA) at a 0.02 scan step size, 2 deg·min−1 scan speed, 0.15 receiving slit width, 30–40 kV, and 30–40 mA. The surface functional groups of CB samples were measured with KBr pellet methods by infrared spectra analysis using a Vertex70 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Co., Ltd., Billerica, USA) for 16 scans over a range of 400–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 2 cm−1.
3
XRPD Analysis of Crystalline Samples
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
XRPD analysis was performed on a D\Max-2400 X-Ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan) at ambient temperature. Monochromatic Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) was used in the 2θ angle range from 3° to 50° with a step width of 0.05° at a voltage of 45 kV and current of 30 mA.
4
XRPD Analysis of Solid Materials
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
XRPD analysis was performed on a D\Max-2400 X-Ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan) at ambient temperature. Monochromatic Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) was used in the 2θ angle range from 3° to 50° with a step width of 0.05°.The voltage and current of the equipment were 30 mA and 40 kV.
5
Comprehensive Characterization of Porous Materials
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
SEM images were
obtained by a QUANTA 450 scanning electron microscope at 20 kV. The
pore properties were surveyed by an ASAP 2010 analysis instrument
at 77 K. The specific surface areas were calculated by the BET method,
and the pore size was calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda
(BJH) model. XRD patterns were measured on a Rigaku D/MAX-2400 X-ray
powder diffractometer (Japan) operating at 40 kV and 100 mA using
Cu Kα radiation. The Raman spectra were recorded with a Nicolet
Almega XR Raman system with a 532 nm laser. LIPC was obtained by a
CO2 laser (Coherent C series 30 W, 10.6 μm wavelength).
The injector containing the analyte was controlled by a syringe pump
(Leifu, TYD03-01). The electrochemical performance of the LIPCE was
studied using CV and DPV on a CHI model 660D electrochemical workstation
(CH Instrument, Inc.). The flow reactor was produced by 3D printing
from stereolithography resin (methacrylate photopolymer resin, Formlabs
Form 2, 0.05 mm layer resolution).
obtained by a QUANTA 450 scanning electron microscope at 20 kV. The
pore properties were surveyed by an ASAP 2010 analysis instrument
at 77 K. The specific surface areas were calculated by the BET method,
and the pore size was calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda
(BJH) model. XRD patterns were measured on a Rigaku D/MAX-2400 X-ray
powder diffractometer (Japan) operating at 40 kV and 100 mA using
Cu Kα radiation. The Raman spectra were recorded with a Nicolet
Almega XR Raman system with a 532 nm laser. LIPC was obtained by a
CO2 laser (Coherent C series 30 W, 10.6 μm wavelength).
The injector containing the analyte was controlled by a syringe pump
(Leifu, TYD03-01). The electrochemical performance of the LIPCE was
studied using CV and DPV on a CHI model 660D electrochemical workstation
(CH Instrument, Inc.). The flow reactor was produced by 3D printing
from stereolithography resin (methacrylate photopolymer resin, Formlabs
Form 2, 0.05 mm layer resolution).
6
Characterization of Novel Nanomaterials
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The apparatus used in the study included the following: Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR, Nicolet, USA); nuclear magnetic resonance (Varian Bruker-500 MHz, Bruker, Germany); ultrasonic apparatus (aligned with JP-100S); Ubbelohde capillary viscometer (0.4–0.5, Qihang Glass Instrument Factory, Shanghai, China); thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA/DSC 3+, Mettler Toledo, USA); D/max 2400-X-ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan); field emission scanning electron microscope (ULTRA55, Zeiss, Germany); OPTIMA-2000DV inductively coupled plasma (ICP) (ICP-AES, Optima 2000DV, PerkinElmer, CT, USA); Zetasizer 300HS nanoparticle size-Zeta potential analyzer (Malvern, UK); and Enzyme Mark Instrument (Safire2, Tecan, Switzerland).
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!