The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Liz 500 size standard

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The LIZ 500 size standard is a DNA ladder used for size determination in capillary electrophoresis. It contains DNA fragments of known sizes that can be used to accurately measure the size of unknown DNA samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

30 protocols using liz 500 size standard

1

Microsatellite Genotyping of Desmodus Bats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We amplified 118 D. ega and 262 D. intermedius samples at 13 microsatellite loci in three groups: multiplex A with primers: Coto_G12, LAS7468, LAS8830, LAS9555 and LAS9618; multiplex B with primers: Cora_F11, LAS2547, LAS8425, LAS9151 and LbT; and multiplex C with primers: LAS7831, LcM, LcU. Primers were previously developed for use in L. borealis, A. cinereus, and Corynorhinus spp. by Piaggio, Figueroa & Perkins (2009) (link), Piaggio et al. (2009) (link), Korstian, Hale & Williams (2014) (link) and Keller et al. (2014) (link). PCR reactions were performed using the same ratios of reagents as mitochondrial sequencing, but had cycling parameters of: one cycle at 94 °C for 15 min, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 90 s at 60 °C, 90 s at 72 °C, and then a final extension of 30 min at 60 °C. The PCR products were diluted with 200 µL dH20. For all samples, 0.5 µL of diluted product was loaded in 15 µL HIDI formamide with 0.1 µL LIZ-500 size standard (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and electrophoresed using an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). We scored and binned genotypes using Genemapper v5.0 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Arctic Fox Microsatellite Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was isolated from ear-tissue collected during ear-tagging. Sample storage and DNA extraction were conducted in accordance with Norén et al. (2016) (link). Microsatellite data were assembled from 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci from a total of 837 Arctic foxes that had been ear-tagged between 2001 and 2019. The dataset was composed of previously published genotypes of 691 individuals (2001–2009: Norén et al. 2016 (link); 2010–2015; Hasselgren et al. 2018 ), and unpublished data on 146 individuals (2016–2019). Locus CPH15 (Fredholm and Winterø 1995 (link)) was replaced with locus 606 (Ostrander et al. 1995 (link)) in samples analyzed in 2010 and onwards. PCR reactions followed the procedure described in Hasselgren et al. (2018) . Microsatellite alleles were determined using LIZ-500 size standard (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) on an ABI3730 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Microsatellite alleles were called using the PeakScanner 1.0 software (Applied Biosystems). We tested for signatures of genotyping errors and presence of null alleles in each time period in MICROCHECKER (van Oosterhout et al. 2004 ) using 1000 replicates and a 95% confidence interval (CI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microsatellite Genotyping Protocol for Genetic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eleven microsatellite markers were selected for the analysis: MFW 11, MFW 17 and MFW 26 [18 ]; BARB 37 and BARB 59 [19 (link)]; TPM01, TPM04, TPM15B, TPM11, TPM18B and TPM 21A [20 ]. Each forward primer was labeled with a fluorescent dye for fragment visualization. The 10 μl multiplex PCR contained 5 μl of Qiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany) and 0.5 μl of Q solution. Multiplex PCR reactions were carried out in reactions of total volume 10 μl containing 5 μl of Qiagen Multiplex PCR Buffer Mix (Qiagen Inc.), 0.5μl of Q solution, 2 pmol of labeled forward primer, 2 pmol of unlabelled reverse primer (Applied Biosystems), and 20–40 ng of the genomic template DNA. The PCR cycle was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 minutes, followed by 32 cycles at 95°C for 45 seconds, annealing at 52–58°C for 45 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 90 seconds, with a final extension of 60°C for 30 minutes. The alleles were determined in an ABI 3500XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using the LIZ 500 Size Standard (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed using GeneMapper version 3.7 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplex PCR Genotyping of 46 AIMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All individuals were genotyped for 46 AIMs [46 (link)] using a multiplex PCR amplification, as done in previous studies [25 (link),26 (link)]. In brief, each PCR reaction was a mixture of 5μl 2× Qiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 1μl 10× Primer Mix, 0.5μl DNA (concentration between 0.5-5ng/μl), and 3.5μl water. The samples were prepared for capillary electrophoresis by adding 11.5μl Hi-Di Formamide (Applied Biosystems) and 0.3μl Liz-500 Size Standard (Applied Biosystems) to 0.8μl PCR product. A 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) was used to separate DNA fragments by size. Analysis of indels was conducted by applying the software GeneMapper (Applied Biosystems). The genotyping results are reported in S5 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multicapillary Electrophoresis for DNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multicapillary electrophoresis of the amplification products was performed on an ABI Prism 3100 Avant Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using LIZ 500 size standard (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) provided with the kit and the data was analysed using GeneMapper™ 3.5 Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). All steps were done according to the Laboratory’s internal control standards and respective kit controls, according to the IFSH recommendations (DNA recommendations 1994 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA Extraction from Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixteen embryos were randomly selected from each capsule for DNA extraction which was performed according to the following protocol: each embryo was incubated for 3 h at 56°C with 20 µl of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl PH8.3, 50 mM KCl, 0.5% Tween-20, 500 µg/ml proteinase K), followed by 15 min at 95°C [35] (link). Samples were then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 2 min to pellet cellular debris.
Genotyping of microsatellites was conducted using fluorescently-labeled primers and an automated ABI3730 XL DNA sequencer. Five microsatellite loci (TB19, QR43, R12, R13, RV11), were amplified following the PCR protocol described in [36] (link). PCR products were electrophoresed on an ABI3730 XL DNA sequencer with the LIZ-500 size standard (Applied Biosystems). Data were analyzed using GeneMarker v2.2 (SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA). Probably because of low DNA quality, two of the loci (R12 and RV11) were not genotyped successfully in some families (Locus R12 for Family 2, 6, 9 and 10, Locus Rv11 for Family 1, 3, 4 and 15). These loci were excluded for the subsequent analyses of parentage for these families.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dhole Scat Identification via Microsatellite Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For individual identification from the confirmed dhole scats, we used the earlier validated 12 microsatellite loci panel described in Modi et al.26 (link) (Supplementary Table 1). We performed PCR reactions in 10 μl reaction volumes containing 4 μl of Multiplex master mix (QIAGEN Inc., Hilden, Germany), 4 μM (2.5 μl) BSA, 0.5 μM of primer mix and 3 μl of DNA extract with PCR conditions including initial denaturation (95 °C for 15 min); 50 cycles of denaturation (94 °C for 30 s), annealing (50 °C for 30 s) and extension (72 °C for 35 s); followed by a final extension (72 °C for 10 min)26 (link). Negative and extraction controls were included to monitor contaminations. Amplified products were mixed with HiDi formamide and LIZ 500 size standard (Applied Biosystems, California, United States) and genotyped in an ABI genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, California, United States). We scored the fragment lengths manually using the same reference sample and following stringent criteria described in Modi et al.26 (link). All samples were genotyped three independent times to ensure good data quality for subsequent analyses. We have also included 101 individual genotypes from our previous study26 (link) collected from five protected areas (MTR, TATR, PTR, NNTR, UKWLS) along with the newly generated data for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiplex PCR Genotyping of Human DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primer XE2: 5′‐GCCCTCCCGCCCAGCTAAAAGTGTCCGGG‐3′ (labeling FAM)
Primer 603: 5′‐CCTGTGAGTGTGTAAGTGTGTGATGCTGCCG‐3′
For each sample, the reaction mixture (21 μl) was prepared in 384 well plates, each containing 1 μl (50 ng) of human genomic DNA, 10 μl QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Plus Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 6 μl Q‐Solution (Qiagen) and 4 μl VIC‐ or FAM‐labeled forward primer and unlabeled reverse primer (190 nM final each). The cycling program was carried out after a preheating step at 98°C for 5 min and included 35 cycles of: (1) denaturation at 98°C for 45s, (2) annealing at 68°C for 2 min and (3) extension at 72°C for 2 min, followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 20 min in a DNA Thermal Cycler (PTC‐200 MJ Research, Bio‐Rad, Munich, Germany). The amplicons were separated using size electrophoresis on the ABI 3730 XL DNA Analyzer. Samples were diluted 1:50 with 0.3 mM EDTA and 4 μl was mixed with 6 μl LIZ‐500 Size Standard (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Raw data were processed using the Gene Mapper Software 4.0 (Applied Biosystems). Overall, successfully genotyped markers amounted to 98.1%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microsatellite Haplotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four microsatellite loci were chosen for haplotyping. All the microsatellites were di‐nucleotide repeat loci. The genomic location, details of the repeats, and PCR primers are described in Table S1. PCR products were fluorescently labeled using a nested PCR approach and a FAM labeled M13 primer (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) as described previously (Schuelke, 2000). PCR products were diluted 1:5 and then run on an ABI 3130xl automated DNA sequencer using a LIZ 500 size standard (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Fragment sizes were estimated using PeakScanner software (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA). The allele frequencies at these loci were determined from control individuals from the same geographic area as the patients. Heterozygosity indices were calculated using the formula 1−Σpi2 where pi represents the frequency of the i'th allele. Fisher's exact tests were used to determine significance of association between alleles in patients and controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genomic DNA Extraction and AR Allele Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from patient peripheral blood leukocytes using a FlexiGene DNA kit (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands). AR alleles were amplified by PCR using GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) and a FAM-label introduced by the forward primer. The primers used were previously described.3 PCR products were checked on a 4% (w/v) agarose gel and then electrophoresed on an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer with a LIZ-500 size standard (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Fragment analysis was performed with GeneMapper software (version 4.0; Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!