The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using pgl3 vector

1

Luciferase Reporter Assay for miRNA Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Luciferase reporter vectors were constructed by cloning miR-4261 and miR-298 into pcDNA6.2 vector (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of ZNF207 and 3′-UTR of ILF3 into pGL3 vector (Invitrogen), ZNF207 and ILF3 into pcDNA3.1 vector (Invitrogen), and promoter of EZH2 into pGL3 vector (Invitrogen). SKOV3 cells were cotransfected with pcDNA6.2 or pcDNA3.1 vector and pGL3 vector by Lipofectamine 2000. After 48 hours, luciferase assays were performed using the dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, WI, USA). Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity for each sample. All assays were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

miR-506 Regulates TLR4 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To predict target genes of miR-506, three publicly available algorithms: TargetScan, PicTar, and miRBase were used. TLR4 was chosen as a target of miR-506. The 3′-UTR regions of TLR4 with the putative binding- (WT) or mutant-sites (MT) for miR-506 were synthesized by GenePharm (Shanghai, China). These oligonucleotides were cloned in the pGL3 vector procured from Ambion (Austin, TX, U.S.A.), and were labeled as WT-TLR4-3′ UTR, and MT-TLR4-3′ UTR. For the luciferase reporter assay, RA-FLSs were cotransfected with miR-506 mimic or miR–NC and reporter plasmids WT-TLR4 -3′ UTR or MT-TLR4-3′ UTR along with Lipofectamine 2000. After transfecting for 48 h, activities of Renilla and firefly luciferase were determined using a Dual-Luciferase® Reporter assay kit procured from Promega (Madison, U.S.A.) as per the method defined by the manufacturer. The results are presented as the ratio of firefly: Renilla luciferase activities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validating BRD4-miR-218 Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Online bioinformatics prediction software starBase v2.0 (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/starbase2/) was used to search the binding sites between BRD4 and miR-218. The 3ʹUTR segments of BRD4 were amplified by PCR and inserted into pGL3 vector (Ambion, Carlsbad, CA, USA), named as BRD4 WT. Mutations of miR-218-binding sites in BRD4 3ʹUTR sequence were generated using Mutagenesis Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). BEAS-2B cells were co-transfected with 0.4 μg of luciferase reporter plasmid and 20 pmol of miR-218 or control by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Finally, fluorescence signals were tested with Dual-Luciferase Reporter kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Louis, Missouri, USA) in BEAS-2B cells post transfection 48 h, with Renilla luciferase activity as control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

NEAT1 and BCL2L11 Regulation by miR-29a

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NEAT1-mutant and BCL2L11-mutant plasmids were designed and purchased from GeneScript (Nanjing, China). The 3′-UTR of lncRNA NEAT1 and BCL2L11 cRNA fragments containing the potential binding sequences of miR-29a sites were amplified from PCR and inverted into pGL3 vector (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX, USA).
HEK-293 cells were cultured in 24-well plates and co-transfected with vectors and miR-29a mimics or miR-nc. Afterward, cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific., Inc, Waltham, MA, USA). Finally, the luciferase activities were detected using a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validation of miR-152 Targeting E2F3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prediction of potential miR-152 target genes was performed using the four public bioinformatics algorithms: miRanda, TargetScan, miRBase, and PicTar. One of the identified possible targets, namely, E2F3, was chosen for experimental verification of its ability to bind miR-152 via luciferase assays. The human E2F3-3′-UTR, containing the putative miR-152 binding site, was amplified and subcloned into the pGL3 vector (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) and named as WT-E2F3-3′-UTR. A mutated E2F3-3′-UTR with an altered binding sequence was created using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, Dallas, TX, USA), referred to as MT-E2F3-3′-UTR. For the luciferase reporter assays, U2OS cells were cotransfected with an oligo (miR-152 or miR-NC) and one of the two reporter plasmids (WT-E2F3-3′-UTR or MT-E2F3-3′-UTR), using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Forty-eight hours after cotransfection, cells were lysed, and the luciferase activity was determined using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega) per the manufacturer’s protocol. Renilla luciferase activity was normalized to that of firefly luciferase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Regulation of LPL mRNA by miR-138

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wild type of LPL 3′-untranslated regions fragment (LPL WT 3′UTR) containing the potential target site of miR-138 at position 1481–1503 was mutated. Then, LPL WT 3′UTR and its mutant (LPL MUT 3′UTR) were cloned into pGL3 vector (Invitrogen), respectively. The LPL MUT 3′UTR was constructed by replacing the UGAUU with the complementary sequence ACUAA in the LPL sequence. 293T cells were transfected with LPL WT 3′UTR+miR-NC mimics, LPL WT 3′UTR+miR-138 mimics, LPL MUT 3′UTR+miR-NC mimics, LPL MUT 3′UTR+miR-138 mimics, LPL WT 3′UTR+anti-miR-NC, LPL WT 3′UTR+anti-miR-138, LPL MUT 3′UTR+anti-miR-NC, or LPL MUT 3′UTR+anti-miR-138. After 48-h incubation, cells were collected to measure luciferase activity using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transcriptional Activity of Nrf2 Using Dual-Luciferase Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dual-luciferase report assay was conducted to assess the transcriptional activity of Nrf2. The human PINK1 ARE (5′-TGCTTGAGC-3′) and HMOX1 ARE (5′-CGGACCTTGACTCAGCAGAAAA-3′) were, respectively, inserted into the pGL3 vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) by Genepharma (Shanghai, China). The plasmid pRL-TK encoding Renilla luciferase was used as an internal control. Then, cells were co-transfected with pGL3 vector, pcDNA3.1-Nrf2, or internal control plasmid (pcDNA3.1-vector) by Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) at 37 °C according to the manufacturer’s instruction in A549 cells. Additionally, the luciferase assay was performed 48 h after transfection using the Firefly/Renilla Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, WI, USA) [18 (link),19 (link),20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Determining miR-23a-3p Binding to HMGB1 3'UTR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DianaTools (Diana Lab, University of Thessaly, Thessaly, Greece) with microT-CDS algorithm (33 (link)) determined that there was a potential target binding site for miR-23a-3p in the 3'untranslated region (3'UTR) of HMGB1. For determination, the fragment of the HMGB1 3'UTR containing the putative sequence (positions 649-669) was mutated by replacing the AAU…GC…UGUGAU of the complementary sequence. Then, the wild type and mutant of HMGB1 3'UTR (HMGB1 WT/MUT) were cloned into a pGL3 vector (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). RAW264.7 cells were co-transfected with HMGB1 WT/MUT (2 µg) and miR-23a-3p/NC mimic (30 nM), or co-transfected with HMGB1 WT/MUT (2 µg) and in-miR-23a-3p/NC (30 nM) using Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). pRL-TK plasmids were used as an internal control and co-transfected with those at a dose of 50 ng. Every transfection group was carried out in triplicate. After 48 h, transfected cells were collected to measure Firefly and Renilla luciferase activity using a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega Corporation), and relative luciferase activity was the ratio of Firefly and Renilla.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating TAF15 Binding in TLR4 Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The suspected binding sites of TAF15 in the TLR4 promoter region was cloned into the firefly luciferase in the pGL3 vector (Invitrogen, California, USA). The HTsFb cells were transfected with the plasmids and the TAF15 expressed vector (TAF15 construct) or the negative control (empty vector), which were coincubated with the lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, California, USA) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. Following incubating for 48 hours, the relative luciferase activity was evaluated by the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Luciferase Assay for SOCS1 3'-UTR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Luciferase assays were implemented by adopting the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega Corporation) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The wild type (WT) or mutant (MT) SOCS1 3′-UTR sequences including the miR-155 targeting site were inserted into the pGL3 vector (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) to construct pGL3-luc-SOCS1-WT and pGL3-luc-SOCS1-MT. AML12 cells were transfected with 50 ng pGL3-luc-SOCS1-WT/MT, 5 pmol miR-155 mimic or NC mimics (control,) and 5 ng Renilla luciferase using adopting Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and seeded in a 96-well plate. The luciferase activities were detected 48 h post-transfection on a GloMax system (Promega Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!