The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using typhoon 5

1

Ubiquitylation Assay Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For quantification of in vitro reconstituted ubiquitylation assays, the intensities of radiolabeled peptide or protein substrates and their ubiquitylated forms were imaged by scanning SDS-PAGE gels on a Typhoon 5 (Cytiva) and quantified using ImageQuant software. Experiments measuring the Michaelis constant Km were fit using nonlinear regression on GraphPad Prism v10, while kobs was analyzed using Mathematica v13.1. All data were measured in triplicate technical replicates. Binding assays were fit using one-phase association in GraphPad Prism v10 and performed in triplicate technical replicates, with data being represented as the average of each replicate, and the error representing the standard error. Statistical analysis and significance in the cellular PROTAC-dependent neo-substrate degradation assay was determined using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. Statistical parameters that were reported in the figures are described in the corresponding figure legend.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Ribosome Assembly Defects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A recombination-deficient Δ7 prrn strain was generated by moving Δ(recA-srl)306 srlR::Tn10 into SQZ10 (61 ) via P1 transduction, resulting in strain BRW246. Mutations to the leader and trailer region of rrsB were introduced into plasmid p278MS2 (62 (link)) to generate variants listed in Table 1. These plasmids were transformed into SQZ10 (or BRW246), and transformants were plated on sucrose (5%) to select against the resident plasmid pHKrrnC-sacB (54 (link)). Strains were verified by plasmid purification and sequencing. For growth rate measurements, overnight cultures were diluted 200-fold into fresh LB Amp, and growth was monitored at 37°C by measuring OD600 as a function of time.
Variants of strain BRW246 (WT, ΔboxA, Δ1575–1598, ΔhA and ΔhB) were grown to mid-log phase and subjected to sucrose gradient sedimentation analysis as described (63 (link)). Fractions (0.5 ml) were collected across the gradient, and RNA from the pre-30S, 30S and 70S regions of the gradient was extracted and analyzed by denaturing PAGE as previously described (14 (link),64 (link)). Gels were stained with SYBR-Gold Nucleic acid stain (Invitrogen) and scanned using a Typhoon 5 (Cytiva). Data were quantified using ImageQuant (Cytiva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Northern Blot Analysis of Small RNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA samples (5 μg) were separated by electrophoresis through 10% (for nuclease knockdown and overexpression experiments) or 15% (for dual reporter experiments) TBE-urea gels (Invitrogen). Following electrophoresis, the RNA was transferred to a nylon membrane (PerkinElmer). The membrane was dried overnight and UV-crosslinked. Pre-hybridization was carried out in Rapid-hyb Buffer (GE Healthcare) at 42°C. Probes were generated by end-labeling oligonucleotides (IDT) with γ-32P ATP (PerkinElmer) using T4 PNK (NEB), and then probes were purified using Illustra Microspin G-50 columns (GE Healthcare) to remove unincorporated nucleotides. Upon purification, probes were boiled, cooled on ice and then added to the Rapid-hyb Buffer for hybridization. After hybridization, the membrane was washed in saline-sodium citrate (SSC) buffer. For probe sequences, see Supplementary Table S1. Washing conditions are as follows. U1 and U6: hybridization at 65°C, washes (twice in 2× SSC, twice in 0.33× SSC) at 60°C. 7SK and dual reporter probe: hybridization at 42°C, two washes in 5× SSC at 25°C and two washes in 1× SSC at 42°C. For the dual reporter probe, two additional washes in 0.1× SSC at 45°C were performed. The membrane was then exposed to a storage phosphor screen (GE Healthcare) and imaged on an Amersham Typhoon 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative hTGase 2 Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assay setting followed the description given in Section 4.3.1, but with altered DMC concentrations being used (0 and 1–300 µM). The final hTGase 2 concentration was 2.5 µg/mL. After incubation for 15 min (i.e., the usual measurement period), 100 µL of each reaction mixture was added to a mixture of 20 µL EDTA (100 mM) and 20 µL 5× SDS-PAGE protein loading buffer. The samples were heated at 99 °C for 5 min, and an aliquot (25 μL) of the mixture was applied to the 10% acrylamide gel. In-gel fluorescence readout was performed using the Amersham Typhoon 5 biomolecular imager (Cy3 filter; excitation at 523 nm; emission range: 560–580 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying tRNAv1.0CUA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
500 ng of the RNAs purified from wild type cells or cell transfected with a plasmid containing the tRNAv1.0CUA are run alongside linear dilutions of RNA standard on a 10% acrylamide gel under denaturing conditions (7 M urea, 1xTBE buffer) for 70 min at 200 V using the BioRad Mini-proean apparatus. The gel is then stained using SYBR Gold and imaged under blue light to visualise total RNA, then the RNA is transferred on positively charged nylon membrane using iBolt transfer system and crosslinked to the membrane under UV light. The membrane was pre-hypridised using the ULTRAhyb®-Oligo Buffer for 30 min at 37°C, then 2 μg of infrared fluorescent probe [5'-/5IDR800/GTG GGA TTT GAA CCC ACG TAA GGC AAT TTT -3', Integrated DNA Technologies] were added. The hybridisation was carried out at 37°C overnight. The excess probe was washed using 2xSSC buffer containing 0.1% SDS four times, then the membrane imaged using the Amersham Typhoon 5 (785 nm laser).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating MRNIP Condensate Effects on MRE11/RAD50 Exonuclease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclease reactions were performed to evaluate the impact of MRNIP condensates on MRE11/RAD50 exonuclease activity. The MRE11/RAD50 complex was purified as described previously11 (link). DNA oligonucleotides labelled with Cy5 at the 5′-end were annealed with unlabelled antisense DNA oligos (1:2) to produce dsDNA (60 bp). The indicated concentration of MRE11/RAD50 was mixed with 5 μM MRNIP-GFP in reaction buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH = 7.5; 2 mM MnCl2; 1 mM DTT; 100 mg/ml BSA; 100 mM KCl), followed by the addition of 5 nM Cy5-labelled dsDNA. After a 30 min incubation at 30 °C, the reaction mixtures were separated by denaturing urea PAGE, and gels were scanned with Typhoon 5 (Amersham).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SARS-CoV-2 Nsp9 and Nsp12 Nucleotidylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleotidylation reactions were performed using a 1:100 ratio of Cy3-UTP (Jena biosciences) to UTP (Merck) pH adjusted to ∼7.4. Reactions were set up for 20 min at 30 °C with final concentrations of 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 50 μM MnCl2, 25 μM UTP mix, 1.5 μM of enterokinase-treated Nsp9COV19, and 0.5 μM Nsp12COV19. Following dilution of recombinant protein stocks, the final reducing agent concentration within the assay is ∼10 μM DTT and 4% v/v DMSO. Within the 1 to 12 compound series reactions, Figure 4B, 15 μM Nsp9COV19 and 1 μM Nsp12COV19 were instead used. The reaction was terminated through addition of 2× loading dye containing 2% w/v sodium dodecyl sulfate and immediately separated via SDS-PAGE on an 18% w/v polyacrylamide gel. After washing once in 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, the Cy3 modified bands were imaged on an Amersham Typhoon 5 using Cy3 settings. Band quantification was performed using ImageQuant TL (Cytiva) with fitting done in Prism (GraphPad). The intensity of Cy3 staining is plotted as a percentage of the signal obtained compared with in-gel DMSO controls after background subtraction. The raw data from wild-type Nsp9 and the C73S mutant were not obviously dissimilar.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PABP-poly(A) Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A poly(A)25 RNA (Bioneer) was 5′-end-labeled using the [32P] radioisotope, and unincorporated radioisotopes were removed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Radiolabeled RNAs were incubated with increasing concentrations of His-PABP WT-Flag or His-PABP 4EA mutant-Flag proteins for 15 min on ice in a binding buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 70 mM KCl, 0.05% NP-40, 0.1 μg/μl BSA, 10% glycerol, and 1 mM DTT). The PABP–poly(A)25 complex was resolved by electrophoresis in an 8% native polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide:bis-acrylamide ratio of 60:1) in pre-cooled 0.5× TBE at 200 V on ice. The gel was dried and analyzed by autoradiography (Amersham Typhoon 5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Vitro Ubiquitylation Assay Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Substrates for in vitro ubiquitylation assays were expressed as N-terminal GST-TEVfusion (TTF2) or His-MBP-TEV-fusions (FL-UHRF1 WT , LPS-UHRF1 WT , FL-UHRF1 KEN:AAA , LPS-UHRF1 KEN:AAA ) in BL21 (DE3) codon plus RIL cells. TTF2 was purified by glutathioneaffinity chromatography, treated with TEV protease to liberate GST, and further purified by ion exchange chromatography. UHRF1 wild-type and variants were purified by amylose-affinity chromatography, treated with TEV, and followed by ion exchange chromatography. Fluorescently Following SDS-PAGE, ubiquitylation products of the fluorescently labeled substrates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and imaged with the Amersham Typhoon 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!