The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using quikchange mutagenesis protocol

1

Cloning and Expression of PARL and MPP Skd3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Codon-optimized DNA fragments encoding PARLSkd3 and MPPSkd3 (Twist Biosciences) were cloned into the pET28-His6-SUMO plasmid behind the SUMO moiety using Gibson assembly. To increase the efficiency of SUMO protease cleavage, a GGS linker sequence was introduced at the N terminus of MPPSkd3 coding sequence. Site-directed mutagenesis of PARLSkd3 and MPPSkd3 was carried out using the QuikChange mutagenesis protocol (Agilent). To express PARLSkd3_ARD, a stop codon was introduced after R327 using the QuikChange mutagenesis protocol.
The coding sequence for Photinus pyralis luciferase was cloned between the Nco I and Xho I sites in pET28 to generate pET28-Luciferase-His6. pHis6-SUMO-Ssa1 and pUlp1-His6 for expression of Ssa1 and Ulp1 (SUMO protease), respectively, were gifts from E. Deuerling. Expression plasmids for Ydj1 and Sis1 were described in (51 (link)). pTrc-GroEL-D87K was a gift from E. Chapman. pPROEX-Htb-Hsp104 (#1230), pSG25-β-Gal (#63867), and pET-Sac-Abeta(M1-42) (#71875) were from Addgene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Site-Directed Mutagenesis of BFDC Enzyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mutagenesis was performed
on BFDC expression
vector pET24dBFDC-His.31 (link),32 (link) Primers (Table 1 of the Supporting Information) were designed, and site-directed
mutagenesis was performed according to the QuikChange mutagenesis
protocol (Agilent) utilizing Pfu DNA polymerase.
DpnI was used to digest parental DNA prior to its transformation into
chemically competent TOP10 cells. Each plasmid used for protein expression
had the complete mdlC gene sequenced to ensure that
only the desired mutations were present.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

GABA Receptor Subunits Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pRK5 plasmids encodes either the wild-type rat GB1a, tagged with HA and SNAP inserted just after the signal or the wild-type rat GB2 tagged with Flag and Halo inserted just after the signal peptide (Supplementary Fig. 12). GB1Ctr was obtained from rat GB1a wild-type sequence by deleting the last 32 amino acids encoding for GB1. GB2Ctr was obtained from rat GB2 wild-type sequence by adding a GFP-tag at the C-terminal end of GB2. The cysteine substitutions were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange mutagenesis protocol (Agilent Technologies) using the primers described in Supplementary Fig. 13 and Supplementary Fig. 14 for the GB1 and GB2 mutants, respectively.
HEK293 cells (ATCC, CRL-1573) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS and transfected by electroporation. Unless stated otherwise, 107 cells were transfected with plasmid DNA containing the coding sequence of the receptor subunits, and completed to a total amount of 10 μg of plasmid DNA with the empty vector pRK5. For the determination of intracellular calcium measurements and inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation, the cells were also transfected with the chimeric G-protein Gqi9, which allows the coupling of the recombinant GABAB receptor to the phospholipase C52 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

GPCR Expression and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293 cells (ATCC, CRL-1573, lot: 3449904) were cultivated in DMEM (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France) complemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum. Absence of mycoplasma was routinely checked using the MycoAlert Mycoplasma detection kit (LT07-318, Lonza, Amboise, France), according to the manufacturer protocol. All drugs (DCG-IV, LY341495, LY379268, and LY487379) were from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). LSP4-2022 was provided by Dr. F. Acher (Paris, France). All HTRF reagents, labeled monoclonal antibodies anti-c-Myc-d2 (61MYCDAA, Cisbio Bioassays, Codolet, France), and anti-6His-d2 (61HISDLA, Cisbio Bioassays), labeled ligands (SNAP-Lumi4-Tb, SNAP-Red, CLIP-Red, and BG-Alexa Fluor 488) were a kind gift from Cisbio Bioassays. The pRK5 plasmids encoding wild-type rat mGluR subunits, with a HA-tag and with SNAP or CLIP inserted just after the signal peptide, were previously described46 (link). pEGFP-C2 plasmid encoding EGFP was from Clontech (Mountain View, CA, USA). Point mutations were introduced in the SNAP-tag mGlu2 or mGlu3 plasmids according to the QuikChange mutagenesis protocol (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Constructs for Tsa1 Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Constructs for expression of wt Tsa1 in yeast (p416-GPD) and bacteria (pET45b) have been reported previously.32 (link) For yeast experiments, genes encoding wild-type Tsa1 or Tsa1 decamer interface variants (all with an N-terminal FLAG tag) were placed under the control of the GPD promoter, which allows for constitutive, high-level expression in yeast.31 (link),32 (link) For bacterial over-expression, the Tsa1 gene was tagged at the N-terminus with a vector-encoded 6X-His tag. Codons for aromatic residues at the decamer interface in Tsa1 were mutated to Ala or Leu using the QuikChange mutagenesis protocol (Agilent) with the primers reported in Table S1 in the Supporting Information, as described previously.31 (link),32 (link) All constructs containing mutations were verified by DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bioluminescent Receptor Protein Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pRK5 plasmids encoding wild-type human PAFR and human β2AR were tagged with a double tag, either Flag-SNAP or Flag-Halo, inserted immediately after the signal peptide57 (link) (Supplementary Figs. 20a, 21). Mutations in the pRK5 plasmid were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange mutagenesis protocol (Agilent Technologies). The probes (full-length mVenus, mCherry, or Rluc) were fused to the C terminus of PAFR or β2AR, respectively, with the AflII restriction site as a linker (Supplementary Figs. 20b, 22). Plasmids encoding human βarr1 and βarr2 tagged with Rluc have been described previously97 (link). The plasmids encoding membrane-targeted Venus (Venus-CAAX) were obtained from Addgene102 (link). The EPAC1 cDNA was obtained from Dr. Lily Jiang (University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas). cDNA for the human GRK2 and GRK3 in pcDNA3.1 was fused to Renilla luciferase (provided by ARPEGE platform, IGF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Site-Directed Mutagenesis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out based on either the original QuikChange mutagenesis protocol (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or on a modified version using only partially overlapping primers [31 (link)]. The sequence of the primers used in our polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) is listed in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Topological Alteration of DNA by GyrA Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ability of C-terminal fragments of GyrA to introduce writhe into DNA was tested in a similar way to that previously reported [31 (link)]. In order to emulate the DNA substrate pSG483 described therein, a single recognition site of Nb.BbvCI nicking endonuclease was introduced into pUC19 plasmid (New England Biolabs) using the Quikchange® mutagenesis protocol (Agilent). The plasmid was treated by Nb.BbvCI nicking endonuclease (New England Biolabs) to create a topologically free, relaxed DNA (S1 Fig). Proteins at various molar excesses over the nicked plasmid (300 ng, 0.08 pmol) were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes in 30 μl reactions. The nick was sealed using 60 units of T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs) at 37°C for 1 hour. The protein bound to the DNA was removed by adding EDTA (10 mM final concentration), SDS (1% final concentration) and proteinase K (50 μg/ml final concentration) prior to subjecting the samples to gel electrophoresis using 1% agarose gel and 1X TAE buffer for 1 hour.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Preparation and Labeling for DMS Footprinting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNAs were prepared by in vitro transcription essentially as described [59 (link)]. The DNA template was plasmid DNA for EΔP5abc or a PCR product assembled from oligonucleotides for P5abc. P5abc constructs for DMS footprinting included 5′ and 3′ flanking hairpins for normalization and single-stranded regions to serve as markers or to anneal with a primer for reverse transcription and RNA isolation [42 (link)]. EΔP5abc mutants were generated by a Quikchange mutagenesis protocol (Agilent). Oligonucleotides for PCR assembly and mutagenesis were from IDT (San Diego, CA). DNA templates and RNA were isolated by affinity column (Qiagen). P5abc RNA was 5′-end labeled by treating it with shrimp alkaline phosphatase (New England Biolabs) followed by polynucleotide kinase and [γ-32P]-ATP. Labeled RNA was purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, eluted into TE buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA), and stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cloning and Mutagenesis of ROS1 Construct

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The retroviral construct pCX4 ROS1 was cloned as described previously (Davare et al, 2013 (link)). Briefly, full‐length ROS1 cDNA was cloned using the SalI and XhoI sites in the multiple cloning site of pENTR4‐No ccDB (696‐1) vector (Addgene Plasmid #17424) via In‐Fusion™ cloning using PCR amplification that included the addition of C‐terminal Flag tag. Simultaneously, pCX4‐puro was converted into a Gateway™ Destination vector (pCX4‐DEST‐Puro) by inserting the Gateway™ Reading Frame Cassette A (ThermoFisher) into the multiple cloning site using EcoRI and XhoI restriction sites. ROS1‐FLAG cDNA was subcloned into pCX4‐DEST‐Puro via LR clonase reaction. ROS1 mutants were generated using site‐directed mutagenesis (QuikChange™ Mutagenesis Protocol, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) of the pENTR4‐ROS1‐FLAG construct and subsequently subcloned into pCX4‐DEST‐Puro.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!